Consistency check on the fundamental and alternative flux operators in loop quantum gravity
Jinsong Yang, Yongge Ma

TL;DR
This paper uses graphical calculus to verify the consistency of different flux operators in loop quantum gravity, correcting a key parameter in the volume operator and simplifying previous algebraic methods.
Contribution
It introduces a graphical calculus approach for consistency checks in loop quantum gravity, providing a simpler alternative to algebraic calculations and refining the volume operator parameter.
Findings
Graphical calculus confirms flux operator consistency
Corrects the regulating factor of the volume operator to 1/2
Simplifies the verification process compared to algebraic methods
Abstract
There are different constructions of the flux of triad in loop quantum gravity, namely the fundamental and alternative flux operators. In parallel to the consistency check on the two versions of operator by the algebraic calculus in the literature, we check their consistency by the graphical calculus. Our calculation based on the original Brink graphical method is obviously simpler than the algebraic calculation. It turns out that our consistency check fixes the regulating factor of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski volume operator as , which corrects its previous value in the literature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
