One- and Two-point Source Statistics from the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey First Data Release
Thilo M. Siewert, Catherine Hale, Nitesh Bhardwaj, Marian Biermann,, David J. Bacon, Matt Jarvis, Huub R\"ottgering, Dominik J. Schwarz, Timothy, Shimwell, Philip N. Best, Kenneth J. Duncan, Martin J. Hardcastle, Jose, Sabater, Cyril Tasse, Glenn J. White, Wendy L. Williams

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the statistical distribution and clustering of radio sources in the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey DR1, confirming consistency with cosmological models and previous deep field results, and identifying systematic calibration issues at low flux densities.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed statistical analysis of LOFAR DR1 radio sources, including counts-in-cell, differential counts, and angular two-point correlation functions, with insights into survey completeness and calibration issues.
Findings
Point-source completeness exceeds 99% above 0.8 mJy.
Radio source distribution fits a compound Poisson model, not a simple Poisson.
Measured angular two-point correlation is consistent with cosmological expectations.
Abstract
The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS) will map the complete Northern sky and provide an excellent opportunity to study the distribution and evolution of the large-scale structure of the Universe. We study the completeness of the LoTSS first data release (DR1) and find a point-source completeness of 99 % above flux densities of 0.8 mJy and define a suite of quality cuts. We determine the count-in-cell statistics and differential source counts statistic and measure the angular two-point correlation function of the LoTSS radio sources. The counts-in-cell statistic reveals that the distribution of radio sources cannot be described by a spatial Poisson process. Instead, a good fit is provided by a compound Poisson distribution. The differential source counts are in good agreement with previous findings in deep fields at low radio frequencies and with simulated catalogues from the SKA design…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
