TL;DR
This paper introduces a deep learning-enhanced optimization framework for graphical procedures in clinical trial multiplicity control, improving efficiency and power in hypothesis testing through neural network approximations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel deep learning-based method for optimizing graphical procedures, outperforming existing derivative-free algorithms in robustness and efficiency.
Findings
FNN-based approach offers better robustness and time efficiency.
Moderate power gain in large hypothesis settings.
Effective case study demonstration.
Abstract
In confirmatory clinical trials, it has been proposed to use a simple iterative graphical approach to construct and perform intersection hypotheses tests with a weighted Bonferroni-type procedure to control type I errors in the strong sense. Given Phase II study results or other prior knowledge, it is usually of main interest to find the optimal graph that maximizes a certain objective function in a future Phase III study. In this article, we evaluate the performance of two existing derivative-free constrained methods, and further propose a deep learning enhanced optimization framework. Our method numerically approximates the objective function via feedforward neural networks (FNNs) and then performs optimization with available gradient information. It can be constrained so that some features of the testing procedure are held fixed while optimizing over other features. Simulation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
