ULXs as magnetized sub-Eddington advective accretion flows around stellar mass black holes
Banibrata Mukhopadhyay

TL;DR
This paper proposes a model where ULXs are explained by magnetized, sub-Eddington accretion flows around stellar mass black holes, eliminating the need for intermediate mass black holes or super-Eddington accretion.
Contribution
It introduces a 2.5D magnetized advective accretion flow model that accounts for ULX luminosities without invoking intermediate mass black holes.
Findings
Model explains ULXs in hard states with stellar mass black holes.
Magnetic tension transports matter, mimicking viscous shear.
Applicable to sources like NGC 1365 X1/X2, M82 X42.3+59.
Abstract
Ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs) have been puzzling us with a debate whether they consist of an intermediate mass black hole or super-Eddington accretion by a stellar mass black hole. Here we suggest that in the presence of large scale strong magnetic fields and non-negligible vertical motion, the luminosity of ULXs, particularly in their hard states, can be explained with sub-Eddington accretion by stellar mass black holes. In this framework of 2.5D magnetized advective accretion flows, magnetic tension plays the role of transporting matter (equivalent to viscous shear via turbulent viscosity) and we neither require to invoke an intermediate mass black hole nor super-Eddington accretion. Our model explains the sources, like, NGC 1365 X1/X2, M82 X42.3+59, M99 X1 etc. which are in their hard power-law dominated states.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Heat Transfer Mechanisms · Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
