On the Bounds of Function Approximations
Adrian de Wynter

TL;DR
This paper establishes a formal framework to analyze the computational limits of Neural Architecture Search (NAS) by reformulating it as a function approximation problem and exploring conditions for efficient solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a formalized framework for understanding NAS bounds, reformulates NAS as a function approximation problem, and identifies conditions for polynomial-time solutions.
Findings
FA is computationally infeasible to solve exactly for all functions.
Error minimization is possible if specific functions are in the search space.
Conditions are identified under which NAS can be solved in polynomial time.
Abstract
Within machine learning, the subfield of Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has recently garnered research attention due to its ability to improve upon human-designed models. However, the computational requirements for finding an exact solution to this problem are often intractable, and the design of the search space still requires manual intervention. In this paper we attempt to establish a formalized framework from which we can better understand the computational bounds of NAS in relation to its search space. For this, we first reformulate the function approximation problem in terms of sequences of functions, and we call it the Function Approximation (FA) problem; then we show that it is computationally infeasible to devise a procedure that solves FA for all functions to zero error, regardless of the search space. We show also that such error will be minimal if a specific class of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSigmoid Activation · Tanh Activation · Softmax · Long Short-Term Memory
