Strong Cosmic Censorship in Horndeski Theory
Kyriakos Destounis, Rodrigo D. B. Fontana, Filipe C. Mena, Eleftherios, Papantonopoulos

TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of the strong cosmic censorship hypothesis in Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes within Horndeski scalar-tensor theories, finding potential violations due to non-minimal derivative couplings affecting solution regularity.
Contribution
It introduces a test of strong cosmic censorship using scalar perturbations with Horndeski-like couplings on charged de Sitter black holes, revealing possible violations in certain parameter regimes.
Findings
Potential violations of strong cosmic censorship in specific parameter regions.
Non-minimal derivative couplings influence the regularity of solutions beyond the Cauchy horizon.
Higher-order derivative couplings can alter the stability properties of black hole interiors.
Abstract
The strong cosmic censorship hypothesis has recently regained a lot of attention in charged and rotating black holes immersed in de Sitter space. Although the picture seems to be clearly leaning towards the validity of the hypothesis in Kerr-de Sitter geometries, Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m-de Sitter black holes appear to be serious counter-examples. Here, we perform another test to the hypothesis by using a scalar field perturbation non-minimally coupled to the Einstein tensor propagating on Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m-de Sitter spacetimes. Such non-minimal derivative coupling is characteristic of Horndeski scalar-tensor theories. Although the introduction of higher-order derivative couplings in the energy-momentum tensor increases the regularity requirements for the existence of weak solutions beyond the Cauchy horizon, we are still able to find a small finite region in the black hole's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
