Is there a Cosmological Basis for E = mc^2?
Geraint F. Lewis

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims that E=mc^2 has a cosmological basis, clarifying its true origin as a relativistic energy relation in the particle's rest frame.
Contribution
The paper refutes previous claims linking E=mc^2 to cosmological gravitational energy and clarifies its proper relativistic interpretation.
Findings
Claims of a cosmological basis for E=mc^2 are based on misinterpretations.
E=mc^2 originates from relativistic energy concepts in the particle’s rest frame.
Incorrect application of 4-vectors led to false conclusions.
Abstract
It has recently been claimed that relativity's most famous equation, E = mc^2, has a cosmological basis, representing the gravitational binding energy for a particle to escape from the origin to a gravitational horizon of the universe. In this paper, I examine these claims in detail, concluding that they result from a misinterpretation of motion of particles in the cosmological space-time, and an incorrect application of 4-vectors. Finally, I demonstrate that the origin of E = mc^2 comes from its usual relativistic interpretation, namely that it is the energy of a particle as seen in its own rest-frame.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
