No evidence for critical slowing down prior to human epileptic seizures
Theresa Wilkat, Thorsten Rings, Klaus Lehnertz

TL;DR
This study analyzed long-term brain recordings from epileptic patients to test if early warning signals like variance and autocorrelation reliably predict seizures, finding no evidence supporting critical slowing down as a universal precursor.
Contribution
The paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation of early warning indicators for seizures, challenging the assumption that critical slowing down universally precedes epileptic events.
Findings
No evidence of critical slowing down before seizures
Traditional early warning indicators lack predictive power
Results question the universality of critical slowing down in epilepsy
Abstract
There is a ongoing debate whether generic early warning signals for critical transitions exist that can be applied across diverse systems. The human epileptic brain is often considered as a prototypical system, given the devastating and, at times, even life-threatening nature of the extreme event epileptic seizure. More than three decades of international effort has successfully identified predictors of imminent seizures. However, the suitability of typically applied early warning indicators for critical slowing down, namely variance and lag-1 autocorrelation, for indexing seizure susceptibility is still controversially discussed. Here, we investigated long-term, multichannel recordings of brain dynamics from 28 subjects with epilepsy. Using a surrogate-based evaluation procedure of sensitivity and specificity of time-resolved estimates of early warning indicators, we found no evidence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
