TL;DR
This study provides large-scale quantitative evidence supporting the existence of a radicalization pipeline on YouTube, showing users migrate from milder to more extreme content and analyzing the platform's recommendation system.
Contribution
It offers the first large-scale quantitative analysis of user radicalization pathways on YouTube, examining user migration and recommendation algorithms across multiple channel types.
Findings
Users increasingly share the same audience across channel types.
Users migrate from milder to more extreme content over time.
Alt-lite content is easily reachable from I.D.W. channels.
Abstract
Non-profits, as well as the media, have hypothesized the existence of a radicalization pipeline on YouTube, claiming that users systematically progress towards more extreme content on the platform. Yet, there is to date no substantial quantitative evidence of this alleged pipeline. To close this gap, we conduct a large-scale audit of user radicalization on YouTube. We analyze 330,925 videos posted on 349 channels, which we broadly classified into four types: Media, the Alt-lite, the Intellectual Dark Web (I.D.W.), and the Alt-right. According to the aforementioned radicalization hypothesis, channels in the I.D.W. and the Alt-lite serve as gateways to fringe far-right ideology, here represented by Alt-right channels. Processing 72M+ comments, we show that the three channel types indeed increasingly share the same user base; that users consistently migrate from milder to more extreme…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube· youtube
