
TL;DR
This paper reviews various parametrization frameworks designed to systematically test gravity across different astrophysical and cosmological regimes, aiming for a unified approach to evaluate deviations from General Relativity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of existing formalisms for testing gravity, highlighting their connections and outlining steps toward a unified framework.
Findings
Survey of multiple parametrization formalisms
Connections between different approaches are identified
Outlook on developing a unified testing framework
Abstract
With the increasing wealth of high-quality astronomical and cosmological data and the manifold departures from General Relativity in principle conceivable, the development of generalized parametrization frameworks that unify gravitational models and cover a wide range of length scales and a variety of observational probes to enable systematic high-precision tests of gravity has been a stimulus for intensive research. A review is presented here for some of the formalisms devised for this purpose, covering the cosmological large- and small-scale structures, the astronomical static weak-field regime as well as emission and propagation effects for gravitational waves. This includes linear and nonlinear parametrized post-Friedmannian frameworks, effective field theory approaches, the parametrized post-Newtonian expansion, the parametrized post-Einsteinian formalism as well as an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
