SN 2018hna: 1987A-like supernova with a signature of shock breakout
Avinash Singh, D.K. Sahu, G.C. Anupama, Brajesh Kumar, Harsh Kumar,, Masayuki Yamanaka, Petr V. Baklanov, Nozomu Tominaga, Sergei I. Blinnikov,, Keiichi Maeda, Anirban Dutta, Varun Bhalerao, Ramya M. Anche, Sudhanshu, Barway, Hiroshi Akitaya, Tatsuya Nakaoka, Miho Kawabata

TL;DR
This paper presents detailed multiwavelength observations and modeling of SN 2018hna, a peculiar Type II supernova similar to 1987A, revealing a blue supergiant progenitor with specific explosion parameters and low metallicity environment.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive observational and hydrodynamical analysis of SN 2018hna, highlighting its 1987A-like features and progenitor characteristics.
Findings
SN 2018hna exhibits a ~14-day cooling envelope phase after shock breakout.
The supernova has a rise time of ~88 days in the V-band, similar to SN 1987A.
Hydrodynamical modeling suggests a blue supergiant progenitor with radius ~50 R_sun.
Abstract
High cadence ultraviolet, optical and near-infrared photometric and low-resolution spectroscopic observations of the peculiar Type II supernova (SN) 2018hna are presented. The early phase multiband light curves exhibit the adiabatic cooling envelope emission following the shock breakout up to ~14 days from the explosion. SN~2018hna has a rise time of \,88 days in the V-band, similar to SN 1987A. A mass of ~0.0870.004 is inferred for SN 2018hna from its bolometric light curve. Hydrodynamical modelling of the cooling phase suggests a progenitor with a radius ~50 , a mass of ~14-20 and explosion energy of ~1.7-2.9 . The smaller inferred radius of the progenitor than a standard red supergiant is indicative of a blue supergiant progenitor of SN 2018hna. A sub-solar metallicity (~0.3 $\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
