Implementing Ranking-Based Semantics in ConArg: a Preliminary Report
Stafano Bistarelli, Francesco Faloci, Carlo Taticchi
TL;DR
This paper introduces the integration of ranking-based semantics using social choice power indexes into ConArg, enhancing argumentation analysis by ranking arguments based on preference relations.
Contribution
It presents the implementation of ranking-based semantics in ConArg using Shapley, Banzhaf, Deegan-Packel, and Johnston power indexes, bridging social choice theory and argumentation frameworks.
Findings
Implemented ranking semantics in ConArg
Applied power indexes to argument ranking
Enhanced argumentation analysis capabilities
Abstract
ConArg is a suite of tools that offers a wide series of applications for dealing with argumentation problems. In this work, we present the advances we made in implementing a ranking-based semantics, based on computational choice power indexes, within ConArg. Such kind of semantics represents a method for sorting the arguments of an abstract argumentation framework, according to some preference relation. The ranking-based semantics we implement relies on Shapley, Banzhaf, Deegan-Packel and Johnston power index, transferring well know properties from computational social choice to argumentation framework ranking-based semantics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies