A wind-based unification model for NGC 5548: spectral holidays, non-disk emission, and implications for changing-look quasars
M. Dehghanian, G. J. Ferland, B. M. Peterson, G. A. Kriss, K. T., Korista, M. Chatzikos, F. Guzman, N. Arav, G. De Rosa, M. R. Goad, M., Mehdipour, P. A. M.Van Hoof

TL;DR
This paper proposes a wind-based model to explain spectral holidays, non-disk emission, and changing-look phenomena in NGC 5548, emphasizing the role of equatorial disk winds as obscurers affecting emission lines and ionizing radiation.
Contribution
It introduces a unifying wind model that explains spectral holidays and changing-look behavior through variable density disk winds acting as obscurers.
Findings
Disk winds can cause spectral holidays by changing their density.
Obscurers can be transparent or translucent, affecting emission lines.
Dense winds may lead to Seyfert 2 and changing-look AGN states.
Abstract
The 180-day Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping campaign on NGC 5548 discovered an anomalous period, the broad-line region (BLR) holiday, in which the emission lines decorrelated from the continuum variations. This is important since the correlation between the continuum-flux variations and the emission-line response is the basic assumption for black hole (BH) mass determinations through reverberation mapping. During the BLR holiday, the high-ionization intrinsic absorption lines also decorrelated from the continuum as a result of variable covering factor of the line of sight (LOS) obscurer. The emission lines are not confined to the LOS, so this does not explain the BLR holiday. If the LOS obscurer is a disk wind, its streamlines must extend down to the plane of the disk and the base of the wind would lie between the BH and the BLR, forming an equatorial obscurer. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
