A physical model for [CII] line emission from galaxies

TL;DR

This paper introduces an analytical model explaining the [CII] line emission in galaxies, accounting for observed deficiencies at high redshift by considering factors like star formation, metallicity, and gas density.

Contribution

The authors develop and validate a physical model that predicts [CII] emission based on galaxy properties, clarifying causes of [CII]-deficiency at high redshift.

Findings

[CII] surface brightness saturates at high star formation surface density.

[CII]-deficiency can result from bursty star formation, low metallicity, or low gas density.

Simple formulas are provided to interpret galaxy [CII] data.

Abstract

A tight relation between the [CII]158$\mu$m line luminosity and star formation rate is measured in local galaxies. At high redshift ($z>5$), though, a much larger scatter is observed, with a considerable (15-20\%) fraction of the outliers being [CII]-deficient. Moreover, the [CII] surface brightness ($\Sigma_{\rm CII}$) of these sources is systematically lower than expected from the local relation. To clarify the origin of such [CII]-deficiency we have developed an analytical model that fits local [CII] data, and has been validated against radiative transfer simulations performed with CLOUDY. The model predicts an overall increase of $\Sigma_{\rm CII}$ with the surface star formation rate ($\Sigma_*$). However, for $\Sigma_* > 1 M_\odot~{\rm yr}^{-1}~{\rm kpc}^{-2}$, $\Sigma_{\rm CII}$ saturates. We conclude that underluminous [CII] systems can result from a combination of three factors: (a) large upward deviations from the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation ($\kappa_s \gg 1$), parameterized by the "burstiness" parameter $\kappa_s$; (b) low metallicity; (c) low gas density, at least for the most extreme sources (e.g. CR7). Observations of [CII] emission alone cannot break the degeneracy among the above three parameters; this requires additional information coming from other emission lines (e.g. [OIII]88$\mu$m, CIII]1909A, CO lines). Simple formulae are given to interpret available data for low and high-$z$ galaxies.