The gravity field and interior structure of Dione

TL;DR

This study uses Cassini data to analyze Dione's gravity field and interior, revealing deviations from equilibrium models and suggesting a layered structure possibly including a subsurface ocean.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed gravity field estimation of Dione and models its interior structure considering non-hydrostatic effects and isostatic compensation mechanisms.

Findings

Dione's gravity field is dominated by J2 and C22 coefficients.

The ratio J2/C22 significantly departs from theoretical expectations.

Interior models suggest a layered structure with possible subsurface ocean.

Abstract

During its mission in the Saturn system, Cassini performed five close flybys of Dione. During three of them, radio tracking data were collected during the closest approach, allowing estimation of the full degree-2 gravity field by precise spacecraft orbit determination. The gravity field of Dione is dominated by $J_{2}$ and $C_{22}$, for which our best estimates are $J_{2} \times 10^6 = 1496 \pm 11$ and $C_{22} \times 10^6 = 364.8 \pm 1.8$ (unnormalized coefficients, 1-$\sigma$ uncertainty). Their ratio is $J_{2}/C_{22} = 4.102 \pm 0.044$, showing a significative departure (about 17-$\sigma$) from the theoretical value of $10/3$, predicted for a relaxed body in slow, synchronous rotation around a planet. Therefore, it is not possible to retrieve the moment of inertia directly from the measured gravitational field. The interior structure of Dione is investigated by a combined analysis of its gravity and topography, which exhibits an even larger deviation from hydrostatic equilibrium, suggesting some degree of compensation. The gravity of Dione is far from the expectation for an undifferentiated hydrostatic body, so we built a series of three-layer models, and considered both Airy and Pratt compensation mechanisms. The interpretation is non-unique, but Dione's excess topography may suggest some degree of Airy-type isostasy, meaning that the outer ice shell is underlain by a higher density, lower viscosity layer, such as a subsurface liquid water ocean. The data permit a broad range of possibilities, but the best fitting models tend towards large shell thicknesses and small ocean thicknesses.