# The Role of Publicly Available Data in MICCAI Papers from 2014 to 2018

**Authors:** Nicholas Heller, Jack Rickman, Christopher Weight, and Nikolaos, Papanikolopoulos

arXiv: 1908.06830 · 2019-08-20

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes the use and impact of publicly available data in MICCAI conference papers from 2014 to 2018, highlighting trends, citation benefits, and issues with data citation practices.

## Contribution

It provides an empirical analysis of data sharing trends in MICCAI papers and offers policy recommendations to promote better data sharing and reproducibility.

## Key findings

- Over half of the papers used private data, but this is decreasing.
- Public data papers are cited over 60% more per year than private data papers.
- More than 20% of public data papers did not cite their datasets.

## Abstract

Widely-used public benchmarks are of huge importance to computer vision and machine learning research, especially with the computational resources required to reproduce state of the art results quickly becoming untenable. In medical image computing, the wide variety of image modalities and problem formulations yields a huge task-space for benchmarks to cover, and thus the widespread adoption of standard benchmarks has been slow, and barriers to releasing medical data exacerbate this issue. In this paper, we examine the role that publicly available data has played in MICCAI papers from the past five years. We find that more than half of these papers are based on private data alone, although this proportion seems to be decreasing over time. Additionally, we observed that after controlling for open access publication and the release of code, papers based on public data were cited over 60% more per year than their private-data counterparts. Further, we found that more than 20% of papers using public data did not provide a citation to the dataset or associated manuscript, highlighting the "second-rate" status that data contributions often take compared to theoretical ones. We conclude by making recommendations for MICCAI policies which could help to better incentivise data sharing and move the field toward more efficient and reproducible science.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06830/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06830/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06830/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06830