# Safe sets in digraphs

**Authors:** Yandong Bai, J{\o}rgen Bang-Jensen, Shinya Fujita, Anders Yeo

arXiv: 1908.06664 · 2019-08-20

## TL;DR

This paper studies the concept of safe sets in directed graphs, proving NP-hardness of finding minimum safe sets even in special cases, and provides polynomial algorithms for certain classes of tournaments.

## Contribution

It introduces the notion of safe sets in digraphs, proves NP-hardness results, and offers efficient algorithms for specific tournament classes.

## Key findings

- NP-hard to find minimum safe sets in acyclic traceable digraphs
- NP-hardness of the problem in tournaments
- Polynomial-time algorithm for tournaments with small strong components

## Abstract

A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize}   \item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we have $|M|\leq |N|$ whenever there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$. \end{itemize} In the case of acyclic digraphs a set $X$ of vertices is a safe set precisely when $X$ is an {\it in-dominating set}, that is, every vertex not in $X$ has at least one arc to $X$. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality in-dominating set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant $c$, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on $n$ vertices in which no strong component has size more than $c\log{}(n)$. Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every $\epsilon>0$ there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most $\log^{1+\epsilon}(n)$.   We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06664/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06664/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06664/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.06664