Selmer group associated to the Chow group of certain codimension two cycles
Kalyan Banerjee, Kalyan Chakraborty

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Galois-invariant algebraically trivial cycles on certain surfaces over number fields, demonstrating that a specific quotient related to these cycles is a torsion group, thus contributing to the understanding of their arithmetic properties.
Contribution
It proves that the Galois-invariant cycles' quotient group is torsion for surfaces with geometric genus and irregularity zero over number fields.
Findings
The quotient of Galois-invariant cycles is torsion.
The result applies to surfaces with geometric genus and irregularity zero.
Provides insight into the arithmetic of algebraically trivial cycles.
Abstract
Let be a surface with geometric genus and irregularity zero which is defined over a number field . Let denote a smooth spread of over the spectrum of a Zariski open subset in the spectrum of the ring of integers and stands for the group of algebraically trivial cycles on schemes modulo rational equivalence. If be the flat pull-back corresponding to the embedding then we prove that is a torsion group. Here , stand for the cycles fixed under the action of the absolute Galois group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Selmer group associated to the Chow group of certain codimension two cycles
Kalyan Banerjee, Kalyan Chakraborty
Kalyan Banerjee @VIT University , Chennai 600127, India.
Kalyan Chakraborty @Kerala School of Mathematics, Kozhikode 673571, Kerala, India.
Abstract.
Let be a surface with geometric genus and irregularity zero which is defined over a number field . Let denote a smooth spread of over for some element and stands for the group of algebraically trivial cycles on schemes modulo rational equivalence. If be the flat pull-back corresponding to the embedding then we prove that is a torsion group. Here stand for the cycles fixed under the action of the absolute Galois group.
Key words and phrases:
Complex multiplication, elliptic curve, Selmer group, Tate-Shafarevich group, Chow group, Abelian variety
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 11G05, 11G15, 14C25 Secondary: 14K22
1. Introduction
Suppose be a smooth projective surface defined over a number field and assume that it can be spread out to a smooth projective scheme over an affine open subset of the spectrum of the number ring . Let denote the group of algebraically trivial cycles of codimension modulo rational equivalence on .
We recall the definition of algebraic equivalence over , which will be used in the sequel. Let us consider the free abelian group of codimension two cycles on . Two cycles are said to be algebraically equivalent if there exists a smooth projective curve defined over , two scheme theoretic points on and a relative correspondence on , such that the intersection
[TABLE]
Here . denotes the relative intersection product in the sense of [Fu].
Let denote the algebraic closure of and Gal be the absolute Galois group. Also, denotes the surface
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Here denotes the integral closure of in .
Let be the -fixed part of the action of on respectively, and be the embedding of into . If one considers the flat pullback
[TABLE]
of codimension -cycles, it gives a map
[TABLE]
Then a general question is: what is the cokernel of this homomorphism?
Mildenhall [Mil] studied this flat pull-back for to be the self-product of an elliptic curve admitting a complex multiplication. He has shown that the kernel of this flat-pullback over any number field is finite. We use Mildenhall’s result to derive the information about the quotient at the level of -torsions of this homomorphism for the case where is the self-product of a CM elliptic curve.
Let be an elliptic curve with complex multiplication by the ring of integers of a number field and be it’s discriminant (for this we fix an Weirstrass equation for once and for all). We denote by and suppose that there exists a smooth spread of , say defined over . Let be the flat pull-back at the level of induced by the embedding
[TABLE]
Then the main result is:
Theorem 2.2: The group is a colimit of the unramified cohomology groups
[TABLE]
here is the Galois group for a finite extension of and is the inertia subgroup of the Galois group corresponding to a finite place and hence
[TABLE]
is a colimit of unramified cohomology groups.
The main tools used here are the Galois module structure of the Chow group of and that of and the Galois cohomology of the groups and that of . The proof involves similar techniques as to show that the Selmer group of an abelian variety defined over a number field is finite.
Coombes [Co] proved that for a surface with geometric genus and irregularity zero, is finite under the assumption that .
Towards proving our main result Theorem 2.2, we start with a surface of geometric genus and irregularity zero defined over which satisfies the condition that the map:
[TABLE]
is surjective,
[TABLE]
for all in , here is some element in and
[TABLE]
Then we prove by using the result of [CTR][lemma 3.3], that:
Theorem 2.6: The group
[TABLE]
is a torsion group.
Here we do not assume the vanishing of as in [Co]. The above theorem is important to prove the finiteness or triviality of . It says that, atleast to prove that it is enough to prove that
[TABLE]
This gives some information on how to prove is finite.
Acknowledgements: The authors thank department of atomic energy (DAE) for funding this project and for the hospitality of Harish-Chandra Research Institute, India, where the work has been done. The first author also thanks VIT University Chennai for hosting this project.
2. Proof of the theorems
Let be as before having complex multiplication by and . Let us fix a Weirstrass equation for the elliptic curve once and for all. Let us consider a spread of over which is smooth and denote
[TABLE]
by . Then we consider the restriction homomorphism from . It is known due to Mildenhall’s result that the kernel of this restriction map is finite and we name it . Then we have the exact sequence
[TABLE]
Now consider the sequence at the level of , namely
[TABLE]
Note that acts naturally on each member of the above short exact sequence. Also if the inclusion of be denoted by , then the pullback map is from to .
Therefore one has the natural long exact sequence on the group cohomology level of for these Galois modules,
[TABLE]
Here , for a -module , denotes the group of -invariants in , i.e.
[TABLE]
Let us denote the groups
[TABLE]
as
[TABLE]
respectively. Also for notational convenience we continue to denote as . Then we have the following exact sequence
[TABLE]
Let be a place of and be the completion of at . Let be the algebraic closure of and we embed into . This embedding gives an injection of into and consequently a homomorphism (considering the Galois cohomology)
[TABLE]
Again for notational convenience we write in the above as . Then we have the following commutative diagrams:
[TABLE]
Let us now focus on
[TABLE]
and consider the sequence of -torsion subgroups of given by:
[TABLE]
Here for an abelian group , denotes the group of -torsions of . Then considering the above groups as -modules we have a homomorphism at the level of Galois cohomology given by:
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
The kernel of this map is defined to be the -Selmer group associated to the restriction homomorphism , at the level of -torsions in the group of algebraically trivial codimension -cycles and it is denoted by .
Let be the Albanese variety such that there exists a natural (universal) homomorphism of abelian groups from to . Now is an abelian variety . Since the following argument is more general in nature, that is, it works for any smooth projective and for its albanese variety , provided the kernel of
[TABLE]
is finite, we do not use the isomorphism . Specifically this is required to prove the analogous result as stated in Remark 2.5.
Let’s consider the commutative diagram:
[TABLE]
Now by Roitman’s theorem [R2], the groups and are isomorphic as Galois modules and therefore the group cohomologies are isomorphic. Thus the left vertical arrow in the above diagram is an isomorphism. Let
[TABLE]
here varies over all finite places of . Similarly
[TABLE]
If we take an element in , then by the commutativity of the above diagram, the image of the element under the left vertical homomorphism is in . Now we prove our main result which has already been stated in the introduction.
Theorem 2.2**.**
The group is a colimit of the unramified cohomology groups
[TABLE]
here is the Galois group for a finite extension of and is the inertia subgroup of the Galois group corresponding to a finite place and hence
[TABLE]
is a colimit of unramified cohomology groups.
Proof.
Let be a positive integer. Let us consider the diagram
[TABLE]
Suppose that some element is there in .
Consider the following commutative squares:
[TABLE]
Let be in the kernel of
[TABLE]
Then it follows by the exactness of the sequence, induced by the long exact sequence corresponding to the short exact sequence of Galois modules given as :
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
that there exists an element in such that
[TABLE]
for all in . Here is from to and is a co-cycle such that it’s cohomology class is in the kernel the homomorphism induced by at the level of cohomology. For simplicity as before we denote by respectively. In particular for all in the inertia group , we have
[TABLE]
Let be a finite place such that does not divide and have good reduction at . We consider the specialization homomorphism from to , where is the reduction of at . Then it follows that the image of
[TABLE]
in goes to zero under the specialization homomorphism for all in . But on the other hand
[TABLE]
is an -torsion for each in (as is an -torsion), so by Roitman’s theorem on torsion, the image of the element in corresponds to an -torsion on . By the previous argument this -torsion on is mapped to zero under . But we know that the -torsions of are embedded in (for which does not divide , this follows from the theory of formal groups over -adic numbers). Therefore this -torsion on is zero (this is because of the injectivity of the albanese map on -torsions) and consequently
[TABLE]
for all and
[TABLE]
in , for all (where does not divide ).
This implies consists of elements which are unramified for all but finitely many places , i.e., the image of the elements in under the map
[TABLE]
is zero for all but finitely many places .
Hence the following variance of lemma [Sil][lemma 4.3, chapter X] tells us that is a colimit of this unramified cohomology groups..
Lemma 2.3**.**
[Sil]**[Lemma 4.3, Chapter 10] Let be a finite extension of the number field . Let be the finite module and be a set of finitely many places in . Consider
[TABLE]
consisting of all elements in , which are unramified outside , that is in the kernel
[TABLE]
here , for a place in . Then is finite.
Thus this result, applied to for any finite extension over (is finite by Theorem 1.1 in [CTR]), we have that is finite. Also observe that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore is isomorphic to the colimit of
[TABLE]
Hence is isomorphic to the colimit of , all of which are finite unramified cohomology groups. Consequently
[TABLE]
is a colimit of unramified cohomology groups. The proof actually follows from the finiteness of . ∎
Remark 2.4**.**
In the previous theorem 2.2, it is interesting to see whether the groups are subgroups of the group .
Remark 2.5**.**
The analogue of Mildenhall’s result was proved for a Fermat quartic surface in [Ot]. Thus for the Fermat quartic surface too, Theorem 2.2 is true.
Now by lemma 3.3 in [CTR], if is such that is smooth and the following conditions are true:
[TABLE]
then for a finite extension of , has finite kernel. This leads us to prove:
Theorem 2.6**.**
Under the above conditions
[TABLE]
is torsion and is described by a colimit of unramified cohomology groups
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof goes verbatim as Theorem 2.2. ∎
Remark 2.7**.**
For a surface with geometric genus and irregularity zero, such that the above conditions as in Theorem 2.2 are satisfied, one has that
[TABLE]
is torsion. Therefore tensoring with gives
[TABLE]
is surjective. Therefore to prove the triviality for , it is enough to prove that
[TABLE]
is trivial. This gives some information about the structure of of .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Co] K.Coombes, Arithmetic of zero cycles on surfaces with geometric genus and irregularity zero. Math. Ann. 291, 429-452, 1991.
- 2[CTR] J.Colliot-Thelene, W. Raskind Groupe de Chow de codimension deux des varits definies sur un corps de hombres: un thorme de finitude pour la torsion , Inventiones Math. 105, 1991, 221-245.
- 3[Fu] W.Fulton, Intersection Theory , Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete(3), vol.2. Springer, Berlin, 1984.
- 4[GG] S.Gorchinsky, V.Guletskii, Non-trivial elements in the Abel-Jacobi kernels of higher dimensional varieties , Advances in Mathematics, Volume 241, 2013, 162-191.
- 5[GGP] M.Green, P.Griffiths, K.Paranjape, Cycles over fields of transcendence degree one , Michigan Math. Journal, 52(1), April 2004, 181-187.
- 6[M] D.Mumford, Rational equivalence for 0 0 -cycles on surfaces. , J.Math Kyoto Univ. 9, 1968, 195-204.
- 7[Mil] S.Mildenhall, Cycles in a product of elliptic curves and a group analogous to the class group . Duke Math. Journal, Vol 67, no. 2, 1992, 387-406.
- 8[Ot] N.Otsubo, Selmer groups and zero cycles on Fermat quartic surfaces , Journal fur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 525, 2000, 113-146.
