The Cuntz semigroup and the radius of comparison of the crossed product by a finite group
M. Ali Asadi-Vasfi, Nasser Golestani, N. Christopher Phillips

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the radius of comparison and the Cuntz semigroup behave under finite group actions with the Rokhlin property on simple unital C*-algebras, establishing bounds and isomorphisms.
Contribution
It proves bounds on the radius of comparison for fixed point algebras and crossed products, and shows isomorphisms of the Cuntz semigroup parts under such actions.
Findings
rc(A^α) †rc(A)
rc(C*(G, A, α)) †(1/|G|) rc(A)
Constructed example with specific radius of comparison values
Abstract
Let G be a finite group, let A be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let \alpha \colon G \to Aut (A) be an action of G on A which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let A^{\alpha} be the fixed point algebra. Then the radius of comparison satisfies rc (A^{\alpha}) \leq rc (A) and rc ( C* (G, A, \alpha) ) \leq ( 1 / card (G) ) rc (A). The inclusion of A^{\alpha} in A induces an isomorphism from the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup Cu (A^{\alpha}) to the fixed points of the purely positive part of Cu (A), and the purely positive part of Cu ( C* (G, A, \alpha) ) is isomorphic to this semigroup. We construct an example in which G is the two element group, A is a simple unital AH algebra, \alpha has the Rokhlin property, rc (A) > 0, rc (A^{\alpha}) = rc (A), and rc (C* (G, A, \alpha)) = (1/2) rc (A).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The
Cuntz semigroup and the radius of comparison of the crossed product by a finite group
M. Ali Asadi-Vasfi
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, USA.
[email protected] School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. [email protected]
,Â
Nasser Golestani
Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 14115â134, Tehran, Iran
 andÂ
N. Christopher Phillips
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, USA.
(Date: 17Â August 2019)
Abstract.
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let be the fixed point algebra. Then the radius of comparison satisfies and {\operatorname{rc}}\big{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\big{)}\leq\frac{1}{{\operatorname{card}}(G)}\cdot{\operatorname{rc}}(A). The inclusion of in induces an isomorphism from the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup to the fixed points of the purely positive part of , and the purely positive part of {\operatorname{Cu}}\big{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\big{)} is isomorphic to this semigroup. We construct an example in which , is a simple unital AH algebra, has the Rokhlin property, , , and .
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 46L55; Secondary 19K14; 46L80.
Contents
1. Introduction
We prove that if is a finite group, is an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and is an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, then the radii of comparison (see below for further discussion) of , the crossed product, and the fixed point algebra are related by
[TABLE]
See Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5. These inequalities fail for general pointwise outer actions; see Example 6.22.
In fact, we prove a much stronger result, relating the Cuntz semigroups (see below and Section 2 for further discussion): the inclusion of in induces an isomorphism from the subsemigroup consisting of zero and the purely positive elements (recalled in Definition 3.8) to the fixed points of under the action induced by . By Example 4.7, the restriction to the purely positive part is necessary. If has stable rank one, then one can use in place of . We consider this to be a striking result, since the Cuntz semigroup is often considered to be too complicated to compute for C*-algebras without strict comparison.
We further give an example of an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra and an action which even has the Rokhlin property, and for which the radii of comparison of , the crossed product, and the fixed point algebra are all strictly positive. It is initially not obvious that such an example should exist. The algebra even has stable rank one.
Along the way, we estimate (Theorem 2.18) the radius of comparison of a corner of a simple unital C*-algebra. This result is surely known, but we have not found it in the literature. We also prove (Lemma 4.4) that if is simple and unital, has order , and has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, then every quasitrace on takes the value on the average of the unitaries in the crossed product which correspond to the elements of .
The importance of the Cuntz semigroup has become apparent in work related to the Elliott classification program. See [3] for a survey of many aspects of the Cuntz semigroup. It is generally large and complicated; roughly speaking, among simple nuclear C*-algebras, the classifiable ones are those whose Cuntz semigroups are easily accessible. With the near completion of the Elliott program, attention is turning to nonclassifiable C*-algebras, and the Cuntz semigroup is the main additional available invariant. Given its complexity, it is somewhat surprising that there is such a strong connection between the Cuntz semigroup of a simple C*-algebra and the Cuntz semigroup of its crossed product by a weak tracial Rokhlin action. It seems, also by comparison with [38], that the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup does not see differences which are âsmall in traceâ.
The radius of comparison is a numerical invariant, based on the Cuntz semigroup, which was introduced in Section 6 of [44] to distinguish examples of nonisomorphic simple separable unital AH algebras with the same Elliott invariant. Its importance goes well beyond this application. For example, it is now conjectured that if is a minimal homeomorphism of a compact metric space , then {\operatorname{rc}}\bigl{(}C^{*}({\mathbb{Z}},X,h)\bigr{)} is equal to half the mean dimension of ; mean dimension is an invariant introduced in dynamics which at the time had no apparent connection with C*-algebras. The radius of comparison also plays a key role in a recent example of a simple separable unital AH algebra whose Elliott invariant has an automorphism not implemented by any automorphism of the algebra [22].
The weak tracial Rokhlin property (Definition 2.2 of [15]; see Definition 3.2 below) is a generalization of the tracial Rokhlin property (Definition 1.2 of [35]) which uses positive elements instead of projections. It is a slight modification of the generalized tracial Rokhlin property of Definition 5.2 of [20]. It is much more common than the Rokhlin property, any of the higher dimensional Rokhlin properties with commuting towers, or even the tracial Rokhlin property. See Example 3.12 of [36] for a collection of examples of actions of finite groups which have the tracial Rokhlin property (and hence the weak tracial Rokhlin property) but not the Rokhlin property. It is shown in [2] that if is a simple C*-algebra which is tracially -absorbing, and if the minimal tensor product of copies of is finite, then the permutation action of on has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Using , one gets in particular an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. (This was proved for the generalized tracial Rokhlin property in Example 5.10 of [20].) However, by Corollary 4.8(1) of [21], there is no action on which has any higher dimensional Rokhlin property with commuting towers.
The Rokhlin property case of our Cuntz semigroup is already known, even for nonunital C*-algebras (Theorem 4.1 of [16]). That paper does not consider the radius of comparison, does not consider , and gives no example like that in our Section 6, in which the algebra is simple and has nonzero radius of comparison. Moreover, as pointed out above, the weak tracial Rokhlin property is much more common than the Rokhlin property.
Something close to the case of our radius of comparison result is also already known. Let be a simple separable nuclear unital C*-algebra. If , and if one assumes that the set of extreme points of is compact and finite-dimensional then is -stable (Corollary 7.9 of [29]; Corollary 1.2 of [43]; Corollary 4.7 of [45]) and, in particular, tracially -absorbing in the sense of Definition 2.1 of [20]. If is finite and has the generalized tracial Rokhlin property (Definition 5.2 of [20]), then is tracially -absorbing by Theorem 5.6 of [20]. Therefore has strict comparison by Theorem 3.3 of [20]. (The group need not be finite; see Definition 6.1 of [20] and Theorem 6.7 of [20] for results for , and [30] for some results for actions of countable amenable groups.)
Despite the relative abundance of actions with the weak tracial Rokhlin property, it is not obvious that there are actions with this property on stably finite simple unital C*-algebras with strictly positive radius of comparison. Getting the Rokhlin property seems even harder. For example, according to Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 of [24], if in addition is nuclear, satisfies the Universal Coefficient Theorem, and has tracial rank zero (or is a unital Kirchberg algebra satisfying the Universal Coefficient Theorem), and is an action of on which has the Rokhlin property and is trivial on K-theory, then is stable under tensoring with the  UHF algebra. The same conclusion, under somewhat different hypotheses, is obtained in Theorem 5.10 of [16]. One might naively expect something like this to be true more generally. In fact, though, we exhibit an action with the Rokhlin property (not just the weak tracial Rokhlin property), in which is a simple unital AH algebra, (although a similar construction will work for any finite group), and , , and all have finite but nonzero radius of comparison.
When has order and is an action of on which has the Rokhlin property, the usual method of proving properties of is local approximation by algebras of the form for suitable projections . See Theorem 3.2 of [32]; there are a number of applications of this method in that paper. Weaker versions of this are true for versions of the weak tracial Rokhlin property, and are implicit in Sections 5 and 6 of [20] and in [30]. This method does not seem to work even for the Rokhlin property case of our radius of comparison result; the best we could get this way is {\operatorname{rc}}\bigl{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\bigr{)}\leq{\operatorname{rc}}(A). The difficulty is with . Instead, we first prove that . Using the notation of Definition 2.14 and Definition 2.15 below, suppose we have with for every normalized quasitrace on . This applies in particular for normalized quasitraces on , so . Thus, there is such that is small. Now use the Rokhlin property to âaverageâ over , as described in Remark 10.3.9 and Exercise 10.3.10 of [17], getting such that is small. The generalization to the weak tracial Rokhlin property uses the same idea, but is considerably more technical, and requires generalizations of some of the Cuntz comparison results in [38].
The construction of an action with the Rokhlin property is a modification of the idea used in [22] to find an automorphism of the Elliott invariant of a simple AH algebra which does not lift to an automorphism of the algebra. The construction there âmergedâ two direct systems whose direct limits had different radii of comparison but the same Elliott invariant. This âmergingâ was done by adding a very small number of maps which go from one of the original systems to the other. Here, we âmergeâ two copies of the same direct system, with the system having been chosen so that its direct limit has large radius of comparison. The action exchanges the two copies of this system. The Rokhlin projections are, roughly speaking, the identities of the algebras in the two original systems.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains information on the Cuntz semigroup, Cuntz comparison, quasitraces, and the radius of comparison. It also contains several approximation results which are used repeatedly. Some of this material is new or at least not in the literature, and some definitions and results are stated here for the convenience of the reader and for easy reference. In Section 3 we prove injectivity on the purely positive part for the map . This is enough to prove the bound on the radius of comparison of a crossed product by an action with the weak tracial Rokhlin property, and our surjectivity result does not seem to help with the reverse inequality, so we prove the bound in Section 4. Section 5 contains our surjectivity result on the purely positive part for the map , as well as results on when has stable rank one. Since is not considered in [16], we also prove the corresponding result for Rokhlin actions on unital but not necessarily simple C*-algebras. In Section 6, we construct the example referred to above. In Section 7, we state a few open problems.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we collect for easy reference some information on the Cuntz semigroup, quasitraces, and the radius of comparison. A fair amount is already in the literature, but there are several facts we did not find, among them, the estimate in Theorem 2.18 for the radius of comparison of a corner. Lemma 2.6 is definitely new.
2.1. Cuntz subequivalence
Notation 2.1**.**
We use the following standard notation. If is a C*-algebra, or if for a C*-algebra , we write for the set of positive elements of .
Parts (1) and (2) of the following definition are originally from [8]. The usual notation for Cuntz subequivalence is . We include in the notation because we need to use Cuntz subequivalence with respect to subalgebras.
Definition 2.2**.**
Let be a C*-algebra.
- (1)
For , we say that is Cuntz subequivalent to in , written , if there is a sequence in such that
[TABLE] 2. (2)
We say that and are Cuntz equivalent in , written , if and . This relation is an equivalence relation, and we write for the equivalence class of . We define , together with the commutative semigroup operation and the partial order if . We write [math] for . 3. (3)
We take . We write the classes as for . 4. (4)
Let and be C*-algebras, and let be a homomorphism. We use the same letter for the induced maps for and . We define and by for or as appropriate.
Definition 2.3**.**
Let be a C*-algebra, let , and let . Let be the function . Then, by functional calculus, define .
Part (1) of the following is taken from Proposition 2.4 of [40]. Parts (2) and (3a) are Lemma 2.5(i) and Lemma 2.5(ii) of  [27]. Part (3b) is Lemma 2.2 of [28]. Part (3c) is Corollary 1.6 of [38]. Part (4) is taken from the discussion after Definition 2.3 of [27] and Proposition 2.3(ii) of [12].
Lemma 2.4**.**
Let be a C*-algebra.
- (1)
Let . Then the following are equivalent:
- (a)
. 2. (b)
for all . 3. (c)
For every there is such that . 2. (2)
Let and let . Then
[TABLE] 3. (3)
Let and let . If , then:
- (a)
. 2. (b)
There is a contraction in such that . 3. (c)
For any , we have . 4. (4)
Let and let . Then .
Lemma 2.5**.**
Suppose and . Then:
- (1)
if and only if . 2. (2)
.
Proof.
These statements are easy to check. â
The following lemma is a generalization of Lemma 1.8 of [38] or Lemma 12.1.5 of [17].
Lemma 2.6**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra, let satisfy , and let . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
We may clearly assume . Set . Functional calculus and Lemma 2.5(1) imply that
[TABLE]
Since , it follows from Lemma 2.5(2) that . So
[TABLE]
Set b=\big{(}(1-g)a(1-g)-\varepsilon_{1}\big{)}_{+}. Using Lemma 1.5 of [38] at the first step, Lemma 2.4(4) at the second step, and Lemma 1.7 of [38] on the second summand at the third step, (2.1) at the fourth step, and (2.2) at the last step, we get
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Let . If then by definition there is a sequence in such that . But there need not be a bounded sequence with this property. As a substitute, we have the following result, originally from [2]. We give a proof for the sake of completeness. (There is a similar result in Lemma 2.4(ii) of [28], but there is a gap in the proof.)
Lemma 2.7**.**
Let be a C*-algebra, let , and let . If , then there exists a sequence in such that and for every .
Proof.
Let . Since , there exists such that
[TABLE]
Using Lemma 2.4(3b), we find a contraction such that
[TABLE]
Now, applying Lemma 2.4(i) of [28], we get such that
[TABLE]
Therefore and . â
2.2. Quasitraces on C*-algebras
The following definition is from [19]. Parts (1), (2), and (3) correspond to the definition of a quasitrace in [6]. What we and [19] call a quasitrace is called a â2-quasitraceâ in [6].
Definition 2.8**.**
Let be a C*-algebra. A function is a quasitrace if the following hold:
- (1)
for all . 2. (2)
for . 3. (3)
is linear for every commutative C*-subalgebra . 4. (4)
There is a function satisfying (1), (2), and (3) with in place of , and such that, with denoting the standard system of matrix units in , for all we have
[TABLE]
A quasitrace on a unital C*-algebra is normalized if . The set of normalized quasitraces on is denoted by .
All quasitraces on a unital exact C*-algebra are traces, by Theorem 5.11 of [19].
Proposition 2.9** ([6]).**
Let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra. Then .
Proof.
This is in the discussion after Proposition II.4.6 of [6]. â
Part (1) of the following proposition is Corollary II.2.3 of [6] and Parts (2) through (6) are taken from Corollary II.2.5 of [6]. That paper uses instead of . We want to avoid conflict with the definition of the norm of a linear functional.
Proposition 2.10** ([6]).**
Let be a quasitrace on a C*-algebra , and define
[TABLE]
Then:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
If is unital and , then . 3. (3)
is order-preserving. 4. (4)
If , then . 5. (5)
is norm-continuous. 6. (6)
If , then \tau(a+b)\leq 2\big{(}\tau(a)+\tau(b)\big{)}.
Proposition 2.11** ([6]).**
Let be a C*-algebra and let be a quasitrace on . Then extends uniquely to a quasitrace on such that, with denoting the standard system of matrix units in , we have for all and .
We denote the restriction of to by . When no confusion is likely, we abbreviate and to .
Proof of Proposition 2.11.
For in place of , this is Proposition II.4.1 of [6]. By uniqueness there, for all , the restriction to of the extension to is the extension to . This implies existence of the extension to , and uniqueness is now immediate. â
The following lemma is part of Proposition 3.2 of [19]. (There is a misprint there: it cites Theorem I.1.1 of [6], but apparently Theorem I.1.17 is intended.) Given Proposition 2.10, we can give a simple direct proof, which is the same as for traces except for an extra factor of in the proof of closure under addition.
Lemma 2.12**.**
Let be a quasitrace on a C*-algebra . Then the set
[TABLE]
is a closed two-sided ideal in .
Proof.
It is obvious that is closed under scalar multiplication and .
Let . Then
[TABLE]
so, by Proposition 2.10(3) and Proposition 2.10(6),
[TABLE]
Hence .
Let and let . Then, using Proposition 2.10(3),
[TABLE]
so . Now . â
We will need Murray-von Neumann equivalence. We use notation which distinguishes it from Cuntz equivalence.
Definition 2.13**.**
Let be a C*-algebra, and let be projections. We say is Murray-von Neumann subequivalent to , denoted , if there exists such that and . We say that and are Murray-von Neumann equivalent, denoted , if there exists such that and .
It is well known that if and only if . However, it is in general not true that implies . For example, this fails in a purely infinite simple C*-algebra with nonzero -group. However, if is stably finite then and are equivalent.
2.3. Radius of comparison
The following definition is Definition 12.1.7 of [17].
Definition 2.14**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra, and let . Recalling the notation of and after Proposition 2.11, define by
[TABLE]
for . We also use the same notation for the corresponding functions on and .
The following is Definition 6.1 of [44], except that we allow in (1). This change makes no difference.
Definition 2.15**.**
Let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra.
- (1)
Let . We say that has -comparison if whenever satisfy for all , then . 2. (2)
The radius of comparison of , denoted , is
[TABLE]
if it exists, and otherwise.
If is simple, then the infimum in Definition 2.15(2) is attained, that is, has -comparison; see Proposition 6.3 of [44]. For exact C*-algebras, one only needs to consider extreme tracial states; see Lemma 2.3 of [11].
By Proposition 6.12 of [38], the radius of comparison of a simple unital C*-algebra is the same whether computed using or .
2.4. The radius of comparison of a corner
We give bounds on the radius of comparison of a full corner in a matrix algebra over a C*-algebra. The result is surely known, but we have not seen a proof in the literature. It will be needed in Section 4 below, to relate to .
Lemma 2.16**.**
Let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra, let , and let be a full projection in . Then, recalling the notation in and after Proposition 2.11:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
The map , given by , is bijective.
Proof.
Since is a bijection from to {\operatorname{QT}}\bigl{(}M_{n}(A)\bigr{)}, it is easily seen that it suffices to prove the result when .
Since is unital and is full in , it follows that . Therefore, using Lemma 2.12, for all . Since is nonempty (by Proposition 2.9) and compact, and since is continuous, (1) follows.
To prove (2), clearly . Bijectivity of now follows from Proposition II.4.2 of [6] and Proposition 2.11. â
Lemma 2.17**.**
Let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra, let , and let be a full projection in . Recalling the notation in and after Proposition 2.11, if \lambda=\inf\bigl{(}\bigl{\{}\tau_{n}(p)\colon\tau\in{\operatorname{QT}}(A)\bigr{\}}\bigr{)}, then and
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Lemma 2.16(1) we have . Since and for all , and since by Proposition 2.9, it follows from Proposition 2.10(3) that .
Now let , let , and suppose that for all . By Lemma 2.16(2), this is the same as
[TABLE]
for all . Since , it follows that , so . â
Theorem 2.18**.**
Let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra, let , and let be a full projection in . Recalling the notation in and after Proposition 2.11, define
[TABLE]
Then and
[TABLE]
Proof.
The parts involving are Lemma 2.17. Since (by Proposition 2.9), the relations are clear.
Since is full, there are and a projection such that . Then . Apply Lemma 2.17 with in place of , with in place of , and with in place of . We get
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
If and is the corresponding quasitrace from (2.4), then, using , we get . Therefore
[TABLE]
So (2.3) implies that . â
2.5. Approximation lemmas
This subsection contains several approximation lemmas which will be needed frequently.
Lemma 2.19**.**
Let , let be continuous, and let . Then there is such that whenever is a C*-algebra and satisfy
[TABLE]
then .
Proof.
The case is Lemma 2.5 of [4]. The proof of this version is the same. â
The statement can also be gotten from Lemma 2.5 of [4] by scaling.
Lemma 2.20**.**
Let be continuous functions such that , let , and let . Then there is such that whenever is a C*-algebra, and satisfy and , then .
This lemma can be proved by approximating and by positive elements whose product is zero, but a direct proof seems just as easy.
Proof of Lemma 2.20.
Without loss of generality and . Set C=\max\big{(}\|f|_{[0,M]}\|_{\infty},\,\|g|_{[0,M]}\|_{\infty}\big{)}. Choose and
[TABLE]
such that the polynomial functions with no constant term, given by and for , satisfy
[TABLE]
for all . Without loss of generality . Define
[TABLE]
Now let , , and be as in the hypotheses. Using at the second step, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, since implies ,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
3. Injectivity of
In this section, we prove that if is finite, is unital, stably finite, and simple, and has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, then the inclusion induces an isomorphism from the ordered semigroup of purely positive elements (see Definition 3.8 below) to a subsemigroup of . Example 4.7 shows that this result fails if we do not discard the classes of projections.
Notation 3.1**.**
Let be an action of a finite group on a unital C*-algebra . For , we let be the element of which takes the value at and [math] at the other elements of . We use the same notation for its image in . We denote by the fixed point algebra, given by
[TABLE]
We extend this notation to the elements of various objects associated with under the actions induced by , getting, for example, , , , , etc.
The following definition, without Condition (4) but also requiring , appears in Definition 5.2 of [20] under the name generalized tracial Rokhlin property. Definition 2.2 of [15] includes Condition (4) but only has approximate orthogonality of the contractions. By Proposition 3.10 of [14], Definition 2.2 of [15] is equivalent to our definition. Condition (4) is needed to ensure that the trivial action on or a purely infinite simple unital C*-algebra does not have the weak tracial Rokhlin property.
Definition 3.2**.**
Let be a finite group, let be a simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on . We say that has the weak tracial Rokhlin property if for every , every finite set , and every positive element with , there exist orthogonal positive contractions for such that, with , the following hold:
- (1)
for all and all . 2. (2)
for all . 3. (3)
. 4. (4)
.
In Definition 3.2, if the algebra canât be type I, since must be pointwise outer. (See Proposition 3.2 of [14].) Therefore is infinite-dimensional. (For clarity, we often explicitly include infinite-dimensionality in hypotheses anyway.)
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then for every , every finite set , and every positive element with , there exist positive contractions for such that, with and , the following hold:
- (1)
and for all . 2. (2)
and for all and all . 3. (3)
and for all . 4. (4)
. 5. (5)
. 6. (6)
, , and . 7. (7)
for all .
For most applications, we do not need the elements . Also, presumably one can arrange to have , but we donât need this.
Proof of Lemma 3.3.
Set .
We may assume . Let be a finite set, and let satisfy . Define
[TABLE]
Define continuous functions by
[TABLE]
Thus, if satisfies , then
[TABLE]
Use Lemma 2.20 to choose such that whenever is a C*-algebra and satisfy , , and , then
[TABLE]
Use Lemma 2.19 to choose such that whenever is a C*-algebra and and satisfy , , and , then
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Applying Definition 3.2 with with and as given and with in place of , we get orthogonal positive contractions for such that, with , the following hold:
- (8)
for all and all . 2. (9)
for all . 3. (10)
. 4. (11)
.
Define \nu=\big{\|}\sum_{g\in G}\alpha_{g}(t(d_{1}))\big{\|}. We claim that
[TABLE]
To prove the claim, first use and to get
[TABLE]
Second, using the second part of (3.2) at the second step,
[TABLE]
This relation implies that \bigl{|}\nu-\|d\|\bigr{|}<2n\rho, so
[TABLE]
and, using (3.5) and ,
[TABLE]
Using (3.6) and (3.7), we get . The claim is proved.
Define and for , and define and . Clearly and for all , and . Part (3) of the conclusion is immediate. Clearly , so we have (6), and (7) follows from (3.2).
Now we claim that:
- (12)
for all .
To prove the claim, use the second part of (3.2) and (9) at the second step and (3.4) at the third step to get
[TABLE]
as desired.
We prove Part (1) of the conclusion. For , using at the first step, (9) at the second step, and (3.3) at the third step, we have
[TABLE]
The choice of and the relations and now imply
[TABLE]
which is (1).
We prove (2). So let and let . Using (8) and (9) at the second step, and using (3.3) at the third step, we get
[TABLE]
The choice of implies
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
as desired.
To prove (4), we estimate, using (12) at the third step and (3.1) at the last step
[TABLE]
Therefore, using Lemma 2.4(3a) at the first step and (10) at the second step,
[TABLE]
For (5), we estimate, using part of (3.8) at the second step,
[TABLE]
Therefore, using (11) at the second step,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Lemma 3.4**.**
Let be a finite group, let be a C*-algebra, let be an action of on , and let . If , then and .
Proof.
Let . Choose such that . Then for all . So satisfies
[TABLE]
Since is arbitrary, , whence also . â
Lemma 3.5**.**
Let be an action of a finite group on a C*-algebra , let , and let with and . If is a positive element in with and for all , then there exists such that:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
. 3. (3)
.
Proof.
To prove (1), set . Since , it follows that . Since , by Lemma 2.7 there exists such that and . Using Lemma 2.4(3b), we find with such that . Set . Then
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Clearly .
Now we claim that . To prove the claim, for every with we have . So
[TABLE]
Thus, using (3.9) and (3.10) at the second step,
[TABLE]
The claim follows.
Using (3.9) at the second step and (so that ) at the last step, we get
[TABLE]
It follows that . Using the claim, we get
[TABLE]
Therefore, using Lemma 2.4(2) at the first step and Lemma 2.4(3a) at the second step,
[TABLE]
This is (1).
To prove (2), we claim that for all . Since , there exists a sequence in such that
[TABLE]
So for all we get, using at the first step,
[TABLE]
The claim is proved.
Use the definition of to compute
[TABLE]
By (3.12) and (3.13), we have , which is (2).
Finally, we prove (3). Since and , it follows from Lemma 3.4 that . Therefore, using (1) at the first step and Lemma 2.4(4) at the second step,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof of the lemma. â
Lemma 3.6**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then for every and with , there is a positive element with such that for all .
Proof.
We may assume . Set
[TABLE]
Applying Definition 3.2 using , , and , we get positive contractions for such that, with , the following hold:
- (1)
for all and . 2. (2)
for all . 3. (3)
.
So we have, using at the first step (so that ), and using (1) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Using this and orthogonality of the elements for at the last step, we estimate
[TABLE]
Therefore, by (3),
[TABLE]
It follows that there exists such that . Set . Then
[TABLE]
Now define . We claim that for all . To prove the claim, using at the first step, (so that ) at the second step, at the third step, and (1) and (2) at the last step, we estimate
[TABLE]
Since , we have
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Lemma 3.7**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra and let be an action of a finite group on with the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let , and suppose that [math] is a limit point of . Then if and only if .
This result holds when has the Rokhlin property, without the requirement that [math] be a limit point of ; in this case, can be any unital C*-algebra. See Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16].
Proof of Lemma 3.7.
We need only prove the forwards implication. So assume that .
We may assume and . Let . We may assume . Since , there is such that . We may require . Set and . Choose such that \big{\|}wb^{\prime}w^{*}-a^{\prime}\big{\|}<[40\,{\operatorname{card}}(G)]^{-1}\varepsilon. Since , it follows that
[TABLE]
for all . Choose . Let be a continuous function such that and . Then
[TABLE]
Applying Lemma 3.6 with in place of , we find a positive element with such that
[TABLE]
for all . Now set
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Set M=\max\bigl{(}1,\,\max_{z\in F}\|z\|\bigr{)}, and use Lemma 2.20 and Lemma 2.19 to choose such that the following hold:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
If satisfy and , then \big{\|}c^{1/2}d^{1/2}\big{\|}<\varepsilon^{\prime}. 3. (3)
If satisfies and satisfies and , then \big{\|}c^{1/2}z-zc^{1/2}\big{\|}<\varepsilon^{\prime}.
Applying Lemma 3.3 with as given, with in place of , and with in place of , we get positive contractions for such that, with , the following hold:
- (4)
for all with . 2. (5)
for all and . 3. (6)
for all . 4. (7)
and . 5. (8)
.
Then also:
- (9)
\big{\|}f_{g}^{1/2}f_{h}^{1/2}\big{\|}<\varepsilon^{\prime} for all with . 2. (10)
\big{\|}zf_{g}^{1/2}-f_{g}^{1/2}z\big{\|}<\varepsilon^{\prime} for all and . 3. (11)
\alpha_{g}\big{(}f_{h}^{1/2}\big{)}=f_{gh}^{1/2} for all .
Since , (8) implies that \big{(}1-f-\frac{\varepsilon}{8}\big{)}_{+}\precsim_{A}s\sim\big{(}x^{2}-\tfrac{1}{2}\big{)}_{+}. Applying Lemma 3.5(3) with in place of , with \big{(}1-f-\frac{\varepsilon}{8}\big{)}_{+} in place of , with as given, and with in place of , we get
[TABLE]
Now define . Clearly . We claim that
[TABLE]
To prove the claim, define
[TABLE]
It is immediate that
[TABLE]
Also set
[TABLE]
giving \bigl{\|}{\widetilde{f}}\bigr{\|}\leq{\operatorname{card}}(G).
For , by (1) and (5) we have . Therefore, for all , using (3.15) on the last term at the second step and at the last step,
[TABLE]
Set . Using (3.19), (9), and at the second step, we get
[TABLE]
Next, we estimate, using at the first step, and using (1), (4), and (5) at the third step,
[TABLE]
A similar calculation, this time using (9), (10), and (1), gives
[TABLE]
The next step is to estimate \bigl{\|}v-v_{0}{\widetilde{f}}\bigr{\|}. For all , using (5), (6), and (1), we get
[TABLE]
Now, by (10),
[TABLE]
It follows, using this, (3.22), and (3.18) at the second step, that
[TABLE]
Combining this with (3.20) and (3.21), we now have
[TABLE]
The claim is proved.
The claim implies that
[TABLE]
Applying Lemma 2.6 with in place of , with in place of , with in place of , and with in place of , we get
[TABLE]
Using (3.25) at the second step, (3.24) and (3.17) at the third step, and (3.16) at the last step, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore . â
Definition 3.8**.**
Let be a C*-algebra. Following the discussion before Corollary 2.24 of [3] and Definition 3.1 of [38], with slight changes in notation, we define
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The elements of are called purely positive.
We recall some properties of and .
Lemma 3.9**.**
Let be a stably finite simple unital C*-algebra. Then:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
(K\otimes A)_{++}=\big{\{}a\in(K\otimes A)_{+}\colon\mbox{0{\operatorname{sp}}(a)}\big{\}}. 3. (3)
and are unital subsemigroups of and . 4. (4)
Let satisfy . Then \sup\big{(}\{\eta_{n}\colon n\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}\}\big{)}, evaluated in , is in .
Proof.
Parts (1) and (2) are Lemma 3.2 of [38]. Part (3) for is Corollary 2.9(i) of [34]. For it is Corollary 3.3 of [38]. Part (4) is Lemma 3.5 of [38] (originally Parts (i) and (iv) of Proposition 6.4 of [12]). â
There are further interesting properties: still assuming is stably finite and simple, is absorbing (this follows from Corollary 3.3 of [38]) and, if is not of type I, has the same functionals as (Lemma 3.8 of [38]).
We will use the following result several times. The main work for the last sentence of the proof is in [1].
Lemma 3.10**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra, let be a finite group, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then, for every , there exists such that and .
Proof.
The algebra is not type I, so Theorem 4.1 of [39] implies that is not type I. Since is simple, Lemma 4.3(4) below (or [42]) implies that is simple. Apply Lemma 2.1 of [38] to . â
Lemma 3.11**.**
Let be a stably finite simple unital C*-algebra which is not of type I and let be an action of a finite group on with the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let be the inclusion map. Then:
- (1)
The map induces an isomorphism of ordered semigroups from to its image in . 2. (2)
The map induces an isomorphism of ordered semigroups from to its image in .
Proof.
In both parts, we need only prove injectivity and order isomorphism.
By Corollary 4.6 of [14], for every the action of on has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. With in place of , Part (1) now follows from Lemma 3.9(2) and Lemma 3.7. Part (1) as stated is then immediate.
We prove (2). It suffices to prove that if satisfy , then . Let ; we prove that .
Choose such that
[TABLE]
Choose \lambda\in{\operatorname{sp}}(b)\cap\big{(}0,\frac{\delta}{3}\big{)}. Let be a continuous function such that and {\operatorname{supp}}(h)\subseteq\big{(}0,\frac{\delta}{3}\big{)}. Then
[TABLE]
Choose and such that
[TABLE]
It follows from Lemma 2.4(3c) that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Set c_{1}=\big{(}c_{0}-\frac{1}{3}\big{)}_{+}. Then , so . Since the action induced by on has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, Lemma 3.10 provides such that and . In particular,
[TABLE]
At the first step combining the second part of (3.28), (3.26), and the first part of (3.29), we get
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
because [math] is a limit point of the spectrum of \big{(}b_{0}-\frac{\delta}{3}\big{)}_{+}\oplus c, and using Lemma 3.9(2), Part (1) and (3.31) imply
[TABLE]
Using, in order, the first part of (3.28), (3.32), (3.30) and the second part of (3.29), and (3.27), we get
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Lemma 3.11 fails if we donât restrict to the purely positive elements. See Example 4.7. We postpone this example, since it uses Lemma 4.3.
4. Radius of comparison of the fixed point algebra
and crossed product
In the next section, we identify the range of the map when has the weak tracial Rokhlin property: it is . This information is not needed for our estimate on the radius of comparison, and does not seem to help with the (still open) opposite inequality to the one we prove. So we prove the radius of comparison results now. Then we discuss what happens under weaker hypotheses on the action, and give the example promised at the end of Section 3.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then .
Proof.
We use Theorem 12.4.4(ii) of [17]. Thus, let satisfy . Let , and let with satisfy
[TABLE]
in . Corollary 4.6 of [14], the action , defined by
[TABLE]
also has the weak tracial property. We may therefore assume .
We must prove that . Moreover, by Lemma 2.4(1b), it is enough to show that for every we have .
So let . Without loss of generality . Choose such that
[TABLE]
Then in we have
[TABLE]
Let be the direct sum of copies of , let be the direct sum of copies of , and let be the direct sum of copies of . Then, by definition, . Therefore Lemma 2.4(1c) provides such that \big{(}u\oplus q-\varepsilon\big{)}_{+}\precsim_{A^{\alpha}}(z-\delta)_{+}. Since , we have
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
Set and . Then
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.7 of [38] provides positive elements and such that
[TABLE]
in . By Lemma 3.10, there is such that and . Replacing with this element, we may assume that is purely positive. By (4.2) and (4.3),
[TABLE]
This relation also holds in . For , apply and divide by to get
[TABLE]
So by (4.1). Therefore, using Lemma 3.7 with in place of at the second step, and using (4.3) at the third step,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Using [16], we get the same conclusion for Rokhlin actions on stably finite unital C*-algebras.
Theorem 4.2**.**
Let be a finite group, let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the Rokhlin property. Then .
Proof.
We may clearly assume . Let and suppose that has -comparison. Let satisfy for all . Since every quasitrace on restricts to a quasitrace on , we have for all . Since has -comparison, we get . Now by Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16]. So . Taking the infimum over such that has -comparison, we get . â
We now turn to the radius of comparison of the crossed product.
Parts (1)â(4) of the following lemma are originally taken from [42]. Since some properties of the projection are needed in our computations, we give a more detailed statement.
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let be a finite group, let be a unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on . Recalling from Notation 3.1 that is the family of standard unitaries in , define . Then:
- (1)
is a projection in . 2. (2)
pap=\Big{(}\frac{1}{{\operatorname{card}}(G)}\sum_{g\in G}\alpha_{g}(a)\Big{)}p for all . 3. (3)
If , then . 4. (4)
The map is an isomorphism from to the corner . 5. (5)
If has stable rank one, then has stable rank one. 6. (6)
If has the Rokhlin property, then is full in .
Proof.
Parts (1)â(4) are computations. (Also see [42].)
Next, if has stable rank one, then Theorem 3.1.8 of [25] implies that has stable rank one, so (5) follows from (4).
For (6), let be the closed ideal generated by , and set . Let be the standard conditional expectation. The proof of Proposition 10.3.13 of [17] shows that . Since , we have , so . â
The proof of the following lemma is easier, and well known, for tracial states. For example, the inequality (4.10) is trivial for tracial states, but it seems to require some effort for quasitraces.
Lemma 4.4**.**
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, and let \tau\in{\operatorname{QT}}\big{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\big{)}. Let , as in Lemma 4.3. Then .
Proof.
Let . We show that \big{|}\frac{1}{{\operatorname{card}}(G)}-\tau(p)\big{|}<\varepsilon. By Corollary 2.5 of [38], there is such that for all ,
[TABLE]
Applying Definition 3.2 with , with in place of , and with in place of , we get orthogonal positive contractions for such that, with , we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for all . This inequality, together with , implies
[TABLE]
Now we claim that the following hold:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We prove (4.7). Since , we have , so by (4.5). Clearly . Therefore, using (4.4) at the last step,
[TABLE]
The relation (4.7) follows because and commute.
To prove (4.8), we start with . Then, by Proposition 2.10(3),
[TABLE]
Therefore, using at the second step, the trace property (Definition 2.8(1)) at the third step, (4.11) at the fourth step, and (4.7) at the last step,
[TABLE]
For (4.9), first we estimate
[TABLE]
Therefore, using (4.12) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Now use Proposition 2.10(4) and to get
[TABLE]
We have since the elements , for , commute with each other. The trace property (Definition 2.8(1)) gives for . This completes the proof of (4.9).
To prove (4.10), set . Then, for , using (4.6) at the second step,
[TABLE]
Next, using Lemma 4.3(2) at the first step and (4.13) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Then, using (4.14) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Finally, we get, using (by Lemma 4.3(3), since ), , and Proposition 2.10(4) at the second step, and using (4.14) and (4.15) at the third step,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof of the claim.
Now we estimate, using (4.7), (4.9), (4.10), and (4.8) at the second step,
[TABLE]
This completes the proof. â
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.3(4), the projection of Lemma 4.3 satisfies for all and . The algebra is simple by Corollary 3.3 of [14]. So is full. Now is stably finite (being stably isomorphic to ), so Theorem 2.18 implies that {\operatorname{rc}}\big{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\big{)}={\operatorname{card}}(G)^{-1}{\operatorname{rc}}(A^{\alpha}). This is the first part of the conclusion. The second part now follows from Theorem 4.1. â
We get the same outcome with the Rokhlin property and for any stably finite unital C*-algebra, not necessarily simple.
Theorem 4.6**.**
Let be a finite group, let be a stably finite unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the Rokhlin property. Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof is the same as that of Theorem 4.5, except that we now use Lemma 4.3(6) rather than simplicity of to deduce that is full, and we use Theorem 4.2 instead of Theorem 4.1 at the end. â
If and is the trivial action, then the conclusions of Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2 hold (because ) but the conclusions of Theorem 4.5 and Theorem 4.6 generally fail (because and ). For pointwise outer actions , in fact the conclusions of all these theorems can fail. See Example 6.22.
Example 4.7**.**
We give an example of a stably finite simple separable unital C*-algebra which is not of type I and an action such that has the weak tracial Rokhlin property but such that the map of Lemma 3.11 is not injective. This example also shows that Lemma 3.7 fails when [math] is not a limit point of . Our algebra is in fact a UHF algebra, and actually has the tracial Rokhlin property. This example is therefore a counterexample to Proposition 6.2 and Corollary 6.3 of [33]. (The mistake in [33] is in the use of in the proof of Proposition 6.2 of [33]. Since , .)
Let and be as in Example 2.8 of [37]. Let \beta\in{\operatorname{Aut}}\bigl{(}C^{*}({\mathbb{Z}}/2{\mathbb{Z}},D,\alpha)\bigr{)} be the automorphism which generates the dual action. As shown there, has the tracial Rokhlin property but not the Rokhlin property. The algebra has a unique tracial state, which we call . It is clearly -invariant. The algebra also has a unique tracial state ; necessarily . Moreover, there is \eta_{0}\in K_{0}\bigl{(}C^{*}({\mathbb{Z}}/2{\mathbb{Z}},D,\alpha)\bigr{)} such that .
Set . Then , but, since , we have . It follows from Lemma 4.3(4) that is isomorphic to a full corner of . Thus, except for the -class of the identity element, the Elliott invariants of and are isomorphic. In particular, has a unique tracial state (necessarily equal to ), and there is such that .
Choose projections such that in . Since and is stably finite, it follows that in . In fact, they are in . Let be the inclusion map. Then . Since is a UHF algebra, this implies that in . Therefore . Thus is not injective. Also, but .
5. Surjectivity of
In this section, we prove that if is finite, is unital, stably finite, and simple, and has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, then the inclusion induces an isomorphism of the ordered semigroups of purely positive elements . If we assume stable rank one, then the conclusion is valid for and as well. We also give the corresponding result for when is merely unital but is assumed to have the Rokhlin property. In this case, we need not discard the classes of the projections, just like in Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] for .
Injectivity was proved in Section 3; the content of this section is the proof of surjectivity.
The next lemma produces the following chain of subequivalences, for any :
[TABLE]
Lemma 5.1**.**
Let be a C*-algebra, and let be an action of a finite group on . Let satisfy for all and . Then for every there are , , and with , such that:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
. 3. (3)
for all . 4. (4)
for all . 5. (5)
.
If, in addition, [math] is a limit point of , then we may also require:
- (6)
.
Proof.
We may clearly assume that .
Let . First use for to choose such that and for all we have \bigl{(}a-\frac{\varepsilon}{4}\bigr{)}_{+}\precsim_{A}(\alpha_{g}(a)-\beta_{1})_{+}. Similarly, choose such that and for all we have \bigl{(}\alpha_{g}(a)-\frac{\beta_{1}}{4}\bigr{)}_{+}\precsim_{A}(a-\beta_{2})_{+}. Set
[TABLE]
Then, for , by Lemma 2.7 there are such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Use Lemma 12.4.5 of [17] to choose so small that whenever is a C*-algebra and satisfy and , then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
If we do not need Part (6) of the conclusion, simply take . Otherwise, since [math] is a limit point of , we can choose such that and . Choose such that there is with and . Define . Since , it follows from Lemma 2.4(3c) that , which is (2). If [math] is a limit point of , then we arranged to have , so implies . Thus . This is (6).
We have . For , it therefore follows from (5.1), using (5.4) and , that
[TABLE]
and similarly, using (5.2), (5.3), and ,
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Then (1) is clear. Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
So (5.5) and (5.6) imply, for ,
[TABLE]
which is (4), and
[TABLE]
which is (3). Finally, , so by Lemma 2.4(3c) we have (a-\varepsilon)_{+}\precsim_{A}\bigl{(}a^{\prime}-\frac{3\varepsilon}{4}\bigr{)}_{+}=(a^{\prime}-\delta_{6})_{+}, which is (5). This completes the proof. â
Lemma 5.2**.**
Let be a simple C*-algebra which is not of type I. Let be an action of a finite group on and let . Then there exists such that .
Proof.
Set . By Lemma 2.4 of [38], there are such that, for ,
[TABLE]
Let be the direct sum of copies of . Using Lemma 2.6 of [38], choose such that for all . Then for all . Set . Clearly . Then
[TABLE]
as desired. â
Lemma 5.3**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra and let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let satisfy for all and assume that [math] is a limit point of . Then for every there exist , , and such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
We may assume . Set .
Let . Apply the version of Lemma 5.1 which assumes [math] is a limit point of , and let the notation be as in its conclusion.
By Lemma 5.1(6), there is . Choose a continuous function such that and . Use Lemma 5.2 to choose such that . Since the action induced by on has the weak tracial Rokhlin property (Corollary 4.6 of [14]), Lemma 3.10 provides such that and .
Define
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For use Lemma 2.7, Lemma 5.1(3), Lemma 5.1(4), and (5.7) to choose such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Set
[TABLE]
Since the induced action on has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, we can apply Lemma 3.3 with in place of , with as above, with in place of , and with in place of . We get positive contractions for such that, with and , the following hold:
- (1)
and for all . 2. (2)
and for all and all . 3. (3)
. 4. (4)
and for all . 5. (5)
and . 6. (6)
for all .
Define
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Further define
[TABLE]
Then and . Also, by (4).
We claim that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We prove (5.12). First, if then, using (2), the second part of (5.9), and (1) at the second step, and (5.7) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Therefore, using the first part of (5.9) and this estimate at the second step,
[TABLE]
This is (5.12).
Now we prove (5.13). First, by (5.11) and (5.8),
[TABLE]
Next, for we have, using (2) and the second part of (5.10) at the second step,
[TABLE]
Therefore, by (5.8),
[TABLE]
Set . If are distinct, then by (6) and (1). Similarly, if are distinct, then . In both cases, by (5.10),
[TABLE]
So, by (5.8),
[TABLE]
Meanwhile, by (6) and the first part of (5.10),
[TABLE]
Finally, using (2) and (1), and using (5.8) at the last step,
[TABLE]
Combining (5.14), (5.15), (5.16), (5.17), and (5.18), we get
[TABLE]
which is (5.13). The claim is proved.
Define , which is in . From (5.12) we get
[TABLE]
Using and , as well as Lemma 5.1(2), we have
[TABLE]
Using Lemma 5.1(5) at the first step, (5.7) at the second step, Lemma 2.6 at the third step, (5.13) and (by (5.8)) at the fourth step, and (3) at the fifth step, we get
[TABLE]
The last two relations complete the proof. â
Lemma 5.4**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra and let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Recalling the notation of Definition 3.8, let satisfy for all . Then there exists such that:
- (1)
. 2. (2)
There are such that and .
Proof.
By induction on , we construct sequences in , in , and in , such that , , and for all we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
To begin, set . Given with , apply Lemma 5.3 with in place of , getting , , and such that
[TABLE]
Then set \varepsilon_{n+1}=\min\bigl{(}\delta,\frac{\varepsilon_{n}}{2}\bigr{)}. The induction is complete.
We now have . Since has the weak tracial Rokhlin property for all (by Corollary 4.6 of [14]), it follows from Lemma 3.7 that
[TABLE]
By Theorem 4.19 of [3], there exists such that . Therefore, using Theorem 1.16 of [38] at the third step,
[TABLE]
Moreover, for all , we have . Since , it follows from Lemma 1.25(1) of [38] that . So , which is Part (1) of the conclusion. Part (2) follows by taking for .
Finally, we prove that . If not, then (see Definition 3.8) there is a projection such that . But then , contradicting . â
Recall the definition of (Definition 3.8).
Theorem 5.5**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra and let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then the inclusion map induces an isomorphism of ordered semigroups .
By Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16], if has the Rokhlin property, this holds for arbitrary and without restricting to the classes of purely positive elements.
Proof of Theorem 5.5.
It follows from Lemma 3.11(2), Lemma 3.9(2), and simplicity of that the map is injective and is an order isomorphism onto its range. It is trivial that the range is contained in , it follows from Lemma 3.9(2) that the range is contained in , and it follows from Lemma 5.4 that the range contains . So the range is . The extension to is immediate. â
Corollary 5.6**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra. Let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Assume that has stable rank one. Then the inclusion map induces an isomorphism of ordered semigroups .
It is presumably true that if is an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra with stable rank one, is a finite group, and has the weak tracial Rokhlin property, then and have stable rank one. However, this has not been proved, and a proof presumably requires methods like those in [4]. It is known that if has the tracial Rokhlin property, then has stable rank one. This is claimed in Theorem 3.1 of [13]. We could not follow the proof there, but a proof will appear in [18]. In this case, has stable rank one by Lemma 4.3(5).
We need the following fact. It is part of Theorem 5.15 of [3], except that we omit the separability hypothesis there. That hypothesis isnât actually needed for the proof given there. (The statement in [3] omits ânondecreasingâ, but, as one sees from the proof, this hypothesis is intended.)
Proposition 5.7**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra with stable rank one. Let be a bounded nondecreasing sequence in . Let , evaluated in . Then .
Proof.
If is separable, this is contained in Theorem 5.15 of [3]. The only use of separability in the proof of that theorem is in the use of Lemma 5.13 of [3]. One needs to know that the algebra in that proof has a strictly positive element. It is enough to show that has a countable approximate identity, which follows from the fact that, using the notation there, is the countable increasing union of subalgebras , each of which clearly has a countable approximate identity. â
Proof of Corollary 5.6.
Since is simple, Theorem 2.8 of [7] and Lemma 4.3(4) imply that is stably isomorphic to . The algebra is stably finite since it has stable rank one, so is stably finite, and therefore its subalgebra is stably finite. It now follows from Theorem 5.5 that is an order isomorphism from to some subsemigroup of which is contained in \bigl{(}{\operatorname{W}}_{+}(A)\cap{\operatorname{Cu}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha}\bigr{)}\cup\{0\}={\operatorname{W}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha}\cup\{0\}.
Now let \eta\in\bigl{(}{\operatorname{W}}_{+}(A)\cap{\operatorname{Cu}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha}\bigr{)}\cup\{0\}; we show that is in the range of . This is trivial if . Otherwise, choose and such that . Apply Lemma 5.4 to , getting and a nondecreasing sequence in such that . This sequence is bounded by . So by Proposition 5.7, and by Lemma 3.9(4). The conclusion follows. â
Corollary 5.8**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra and let be an action of a finite group on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Then
[TABLE]
as ordered semigroups. If has stable rank one, then
[TABLE]
as ordered semigroups.
Proof.
It suffices to prove that {\operatorname{Cu}}_{+}\bigl{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\bigr{)}\cong{\operatorname{Cu}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha} and, in the stable rank one case, that {\operatorname{W}}_{+}\bigl{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\bigr{)}\cong{\operatorname{W}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha}.
Lemma 4.3(4) and simplicity of (Corollary 3.3 of [14]) imply that is isomorphic to a full corner of . Since and are both unital, it is easy to check that there is such that is isomorphic to a full corner of . Therefore . In particular, . Using Theorem 5.5 at the second step, we get
[TABLE]
When has stable rank one, the isomorphism {\operatorname{W}}_{+}\bigl{(}C^{*}(G,A,\alpha)\bigr{)}\cong{\operatorname{W}}_{+}(A)^{\alpha} follows similarly, using Corollary 5.6 and . â
There is an analog of Corollary 5.6 for Rokhlin actions on unital C*-algebras, whose proof uses Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] instead of our Theorem 5.5.
Proposition 5.9**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra with stable rank one. Let be an action of a finite group on which has the Rokhlin property. Then the inclusion map induces an isomorphism of ordered semigroups .
We need Proposition 4.1(1) of [32], but without the separability hypothesis there. We give an easy proof directly from Theorem 3.2 of [32].
Proposition 5.10**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra with stable rank one. Let be an action of a finite group on which has the Rokhlin property. Then has stable rank one.
Proof.
Let and let . Use Theorem 3.2 of [32] to choose a projection , an integer , a unital homomorphism , and an element such that . Combining Theorem 3.1.8 and Theorem 3.1.9(1) of [25], we see that has stable rank one. Choose such that is invertible and . Then is an invertible element of such that . â
Proof of Proposition 5.9.
The algebra has stable rank one by Proposition 5.10. It now follows from Lemma 4.3(5) that has stable rank one.
Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] implies that is an order isomorphism from to some subsemigroup of , which is necessarily contained in .
Let ; we need to show that is in the range of . Choose and such that . Since , by Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] there is such that . The case is trivial, so without loss of generality . We now construct, by induction on , sequences in , in , and in , such that , , and for all we have
[TABLE]
To begin, set and . Given with , set . Choose , and such that . Two applications of Lemma 2.4(3c) give
[TABLE]
Set . The induction is complete.
For , set , which is in . Then is a nondecreasing sequence in and, by Lemma 1.25(1) of [38], we have . This sequence is bounded by , so Proposition 5.7 now implies . â
6. An example
We give an example of a simple AH algebra with and an action which has the Rokhlin property. As discussed in the introduction, it is not a priori obvious that such examples should exist, even with the weak tracial Rokhlin property in place of the Rokhlin property. In our example, we get equality in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5. See Theorem 6.15 and Theorem 6.21. The algebras and have stable rank one (Lemma 6.5 and Corollary 6.7), and the maps and are isomorphisms (Corollary 6.6).
The construction is motivated by [22], in which two AH direct systems with simple direct limits are âmergedâ into a single larger system whose direct limit is still simple but which is ânot very farâ from the direct sum of the two original direct limits. The âmergerâ is accomplished by writing the systems side by side, and inserting a very small number of point evaluation maps which go from one of the original systems to the other. In [22], the essential point was that the two systems were very different but that the base spaces were all contractible. Here, we use two copies of the same system. Writing the direct system sideways, our combined system looks like the following diagram, in which the solid arrows represent many partial maps and the dotted arrows represent a small number of point evaluations:
[TABLE]
The order two automorphism exchanges the two rows.
Since we donât care about contractibility, we can use products of copies of instead of cones over such spaces as in [22]. We compute the radius of comparison exactly, instead of just giving bounds as is done in [22].
To keep the notation simple, we carry out only the case of and radius of comparison less than . Modifications of the construction will presumably work for any finite group and give any value of the radius of comparison in .
Construction 6.1**.**
We define the following objects:
- (1)
For , define
- âą
.
- âą
.
- âą
and .
- âą
and .
- âą
u(n)=\frac{s(n)}{r(n)}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\big{(}1-\frac{1}{2^{k+1}}\big{)}.
- âą
and . 2. (2)
Define . 3. (3)
For , define a compact space by . Then the covering dimension of is . 4. (4)
For and , let be the  coordinate projection. 5. (5)
Choose points for such that for all , the set
[TABLE]
is dense in . (The contribution to this set when is .) 6. (6)
For , define
[TABLE]
When convenient, we identify in the obvious ways with
[TABLE] 7. (7)
For , define a unital homomorphism
[TABLE]
by
[TABLE] 8. (8)
For , define by . Thus,
[TABLE]
is given by
[TABLE]
for and . Using standard matrix unit notation, we can also write this definition as
[TABLE]
For with , now define
[TABLE] 9. (9)
Define
[TABLE]
For , it is clear that is an injective unital homomorphism. Let be the standard map associated with the direct limit. 10. (10)
Write . For , define by
[TABLE]
for and . We also write for the generating automorphism . We then have the following diagram:
[TABLE]
Lemma 6.2**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1. Then for all .
Proof.
The statement is true for by definition. Let and assume . Then
[TABLE]
which implies (using )
[TABLE]
So for all by induction. â
Lemma 6.3**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1. Then is strictly decreasing and .
Proof.
The first statement is clear, as is .
To prove that , we first observe that if then . Induction gives an analogous statement for  factors, so that, in particular, . Letting , we get . â
Lemma 6.4**.**
In Construction 6.1(10), the diagram (6.3) commutes. Moreover, there is a unique action such that , and this action has the Rokhlin property..
Proof.
For the first statement, let . Using 6.1(7) in the second step and 6.1(10) in the third step, for all and for all we have
[TABLE]
Existence of follows immediately. It is immediate that has the Rokhlin property for all , and it follows easily that has the Rokhlin property. â
Lemma 6.5**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1. Then the C*-algebra is stably finite and simple, and has stable rank one.
Proof.
Stable finiteness is immediate. For simplicity, it is easy to check that the hypotheses of Proposition 2.1(ii) of [9] hold. For stable rank one, we observe that the direct system in Construction 6.1(9) has diagonal maps in the sense of Definition 2.1 of [10]. Therefore has stable rank one by Theorem 4.1 of [10]. â
Corollary 6.6**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1. Then the maps and are isomorphisms.
Proof.
This follows from Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] and Proposition 5.9, by Lemma 6.5 and Lemma 6.4. â
Corollary 6.7**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1. Then and have stable rank one.
Proof.
The result for follows from Lemma 6.5, Lemma 6.4, and Proposition 4.1(1) of [32]. The result for now follows from Lemma 4.3(5). â
Notation 6.8**.**
Let denote the Bott projection, and let be the tautological line bundle over . (Thus, the range of is the section space of .) Recall that . Assuming the notation and choices in Construction 6.1, for set
[TABLE]
In particular, and .
Lemma 6.9** ([22]).**
The Cartesian product does not embed in a trivial bundle over of rank less than .
Proof.
This is Lemma 1.9 of [22]. â
Lemma 6.10**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1, and adopt Notation 6.8. Let . For let be the  coordinate projection. Then:
- (1)
There are orthogonal projections , c^{(1)}_{n},g_{n}\in M_{2r(n)}\big{(}C(X_{n})\big{)} such that
[TABLE]
is the direct sum of the projections for , is a constant projection of rank , and is a constant projection of rank . 2. (2)
For every and we have .
Proof.
We prove the formula in (1) for by induction on . The formula for \big{(}{\operatorname{id}}_{M_{2}}\otimes\alpha^{(n)}\big{)}(p_{n}) then follows from the definition of .
The formula holds for , since , , and .
Now assume that it is known for . Recall that . (See Construction 6.1(8).) We suppress in the notation. With this convention, first take in (6.1) to be \big{(}c_{n}^{(0)},0\big{)}. The first coordinate \Lambda_{n+1,n}\big{(}c_{n}^{(0)},0\big{)}_{1} is of the form required for , while \Lambda_{n+1,n}\big{(}c_{n}^{(0)},0\big{)}_{2} is a constant function of rank . In the same manner, we see that:
- âą
\Lambda_{n+1,n}\big{(}c_{n}^{(1)},0\big{)}_{1} is a constant projection of rank .
- âą
\Lambda_{n+1,n}\big{(}c_{n}^{(1)},0\big{)}_{2} is a constant projection of rank .
- âą
is a constant projection of rank .
- âą
is a constant projection of rank .
Putting these together, we get in the first coordinate of the direct sum of as described and a constant function of rank
[TABLE]
A computation shows that this expression is equal to . In the second coordinate we get a constant projection of rank
[TABLE]
This completes the induction.
For Part (2), we may assume that is extreme in . Then there is such that . Therefore
[TABLE]
In each case, Lemma 6.2 implies . This completes the proof. â
Lemma 6.11**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1, and adopt the notation of Notation 6.8. Let . For let be the  coordinate projection. Then:
- (1)
There are orthogonal projections in M_{2r(n)}\big{(}C(X_{n})\big{)} such that , is the direct sum of the projections for , and is a constant projection of rank . 2. (2)
For every and , we have .
Proof.
We prove Part (1). Using Lemma 6.10(1), Lemma 6.4, and the definition of in the third step, we get
[TABLE]
Now it is enough to set and .
For Part (2), we may assume that is extreme in . Then there is such that . Adding up the ranks given in Part (1), we see that for all . The conclusion follows. â
Definition 6.12**.**
Let be a unital C*-algebra and let be a projection in . We call trivial if there is such that is Murray-von Neumann equivalent to . When , this means .
Corollary 6.13**.**
Adopt the assumptions and notation of Notation 6.8. Let and let be a projection in such that is trivial. If there exists such that , then .
Proof.
Recall the line bundle and the projection from Notation 6.8. Also recall from Definition 2.13 that we use for Murray-von Neumann equivalence and for Murray-von Neumann subequivalence.
Let be as in Lemma 6.11, and define . The range of is isomorphic to the section space of the -dimensional vector bundle and . Now implies
[TABLE]
Since and are projections, . So there is projection such that . Also, implies that is Murray-von Neumann equivalent to a subprojection of . Therefore , so . Take to be a trivial projection of rank such that . Since and are trivial, . So
[TABLE]
Define . Then . Now:
- âą
Let be a vector bundle whose section space is isomorphic to the range of .
- âą
Let be a trivial vector bundle whose section space is isomorphic to the range of .
- âą
Set .
- âą
Let be a trivial vector bundle whose section space is isomorphic to the range of .
Putting these together and using Theorem 9.1.5 of [23], we get . Therefore . So by Lemma 6.9. Since , we have . â
Remark 6.14**.**
We will use results of Niu from [26] to obtain an upper bound on the radius of comparison of our algebra. Niu introduced a notion of mean dimension for a diagonal AH-system, [26, Definition 3.6]. Suppose we are given a direct system of homogeneous algebras of the form
[TABLE]
in which each of the spaces involved is a connected finite CW complex, and the connecting maps are unital diagonal maps. Let denote the mean dimension of this system, in the sense of Niu. It follows trivially from [26, Definition 3.6] that
[TABLE]
Theorem 6.2 of [26] then states that if is the direct limit of a system as above, then . Since the system we are considering here is of this type, Niuâs theorem applies.
Theorem 6.15**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1 and Notation 6.8. Then .
Proof.
Since and the C*-algebra was constructed with diagonal maps, we deduce from Remark 6.14 that . Now it suffices to prove that . Suppose . We show that does not have -comparison. Choose such that . Choose such that . Let be a trivial projection of rank . By slight abuse of notation, we use to denote the amplified map from to as well. For , the rank of is .
We claim that the rank of is strictly less than for . Suppose {\operatorname{rank}}\big{(}\Lambda_{m,n}(e)\big{)}\geq r(m)+s(m). Then, by the choice of ,
[TABLE]
Thus . This contradicts Lemma 6.3 and Construction 6.1(2). So the claim follows.
Now, for any tracial state on (and thus for any tracial state on ), we have, using Lemma 6.11(2) in the last step,
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if \Lambda_{\infty,0}\big{(}(p,\,p)\big{)}\lessapprox\Lambda_{\infty,n}(e) then, in particular, there exists some and such that . Using Corollary 6.13, we have
[TABLE]
This is a contradiction, and we have proved that does not have -comparison. â
We now determine the radius of comparison of the crossed product in our example. The methods are very similar.
Construction 6.16**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Parts (1), (3), (4), and (5) in Construction 6.1.
- (1)
For , we define , identified with . 2. (2)
Let be the unitary matrix . Define by
[TABLE]
for and . With abuse of notation (the expression is the constant function with value ), the analog of (6.2) is
[TABLE]
It is clear that is injective for all . 3. (3)
Define .
Lemma 6.17**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1 and Construction 6.16. Then .
Proof.
For , as in Notation 3.1 let be the standard unitary in a crossed product by . (In this proof, no confusion will be caused by using the same letter in all crossed products.) For , there is a homomorphism
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
for , , and . In view of Lemma 6.4, we can apply Theorem 9.4.34 of [17] to get an isomorphism
[TABLE]
On the other hand, we have an isomorphism which is defined for and for by
[TABLE]
Using matrix unit notation, the right hand side is
[TABLE]
Using (6.2) and (6.4), one checks that the diagram
[TABLE]
commutes for every . The result follows. â
Notation 6.18**.**
Let be the Bott projection, as in Notation 6.8. Assuming the notation and choices in 6.16, for set . In particular, .
Lemma 6.19**.**
Adopt the assumptions and notation of Notation 6.18. Let and for let be the  coordinate projection. Then:
- (1)
There are orthogonal projections in M_{2r(n)}\big{(}C(X_{n})\big{)} such that , is the direct sum of the projections for , and is a constant projection of rank . 2. (2)
For every and , we have .
Proof.
The proof of (1) is very similar to that of Lemma 6.11(1), but simpler because there is only one summand. The basic facts for the induction step are that is the direct sum of the projections for and , and a constant projection of rank , and that is a constant projection of rank . We omit the details.
The proof of (2) is essentially the same as that of Lemma 6.11(2), and is omitted. â
Corollary 6.20**.**
Adopt the assumptions and notation of Notation 6.18. Let and let be a trivial projection in . If there exists such that then .
Proof.
The proof is essentially the same as that of Corollary 6.13. We use Lemma 6.19 and the projections and instead of Lemma 6.11 and the projections and . â
The next result is the analog of Theorem 6.15. It shows that in our example, we get equality in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5.
Theorem 6.21**.**
Assume the notation and choices in Construction 6.1 and Notation 6.8. Then
[TABLE]
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 6.15. We give details to show where the factor comes from, and for convenient reference in a paper in preparation.
Proof of Theorem 6.21.
We prove the first part of the conclusion. The second part then follows from Theorem 4.5.
Because is isomorphic to the C*-algebra by Lemma 6.17, it suffices to show that . Since and the C*-algebra was constructed with diagonal maps, we deduce from Remark 6.14 that . Now it suffices to prove that . Suppose . We show that does not have -comparison. Choose such that . Choose such that . Let be a trivial projection of rank . By slight abuse of notation, we use to denote the amplified map from to as well. For , the rank of is . We claim that the rank of is strictly less than for . Suppose {\operatorname{rank}}\big{(}\Lambda^{\prime}_{m,n}(e)\big{)}\geq r(m)+s(m). Then, considering the choice of ,
[TABLE]
Thus . This contradicts Construction 6.1(2). So the claim follows.
Now, for any extreme tracial state on (and thus for any trace on ), we have, using Lemma 6.19(2) in the last step,
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if then, in particular, there exists some and such that . Using Corollary 6.20, we get
[TABLE]
This is a contradiction, and we have proved that does not have -comparison. â
Example 6.22**.**
We show that, in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5, the weak tracial Rokhlin property canât be replaced by pointwise outerness.
Let and be as in Lemma 6.4, set , and let be the dual action. It follows from Theorem 6.15, Theorem 6.21, and Lemma 6.3 that the inequalities in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5 fail for the action .
We already know that is simple, and is stably finite because it is an AH algebra. It remains to show that is pointwise outer. Suppose not. Then in fact is an inner action, that is, given by conjugation by a unitary of order . (See Exercise 8.2.7 of [17].) So . But by Takai duality , which is simple. Pointwise outerness is proved.
7. Open problems
The most obvious problem is whether equality always holds in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5.
Question 7.1**.**
Let be a finite group, let be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let be an action of on which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Does it follow that
[TABLE]
One might even hope that the reverse inequalities
[TABLE]
hold without restrictions on the action. Quite different methods seem to be needed for this question. Suppose, for example, that we were able to prove (7.1) for pointwise outer actions. Suppose is finite abelian, is pointwise outer, and, with , the dual action is pointwise outer and has strict comparison. We would be able to deduce that C^{*}\bigl{(}{\widehat{G}},B,\beta\bigr{)} has strict comparison. This outcome is at least heuristically related to the long standing open question of whether the crossed product of a simple C*-algebra with stable rank one by a finite group again has stable rank one. Indeed, if is classifiable in the sense of the Elliott program, and the tracial state space has compact finite-dimensional extreme boundary, it would follow (see Corollary 7.9 of [29], Corollary 1.2 of [43], or Corollary 4.7 of [45]) that C^{*}\bigl{(}{\widehat{G}},B,\beta\bigr{)} is -stable, and therefore from Theorem 6.7 of [41] that C^{*}\bigl{(}{\widehat{G}},B,\beta\bigr{)} has stable rank one. This case of the problem has been solved [31], but the proof depends on major results in the classification program.
In the example in Section 6, the group action on is highly nontrivial.
Question 7.2**.**
Does there exist an action of a nontrivial finite group with the weak tracial Rokhlin property on a simple separable unital C*-algebra with and such that every tracial state is invariant?
One can ask for even more.
Question 7.3**.**
Does there exist an action of a nontrivial finite group with the Rokhlin property on a simple separable unital C*-algebra with and unique tracial state?
By combining methods of Villadsen [46] with those of Section 6, one should be able to at least produce an example of a simple separable unital nuclear C*-algebra and an action such that does not have stable rank one, has the Rokhlin property, and has exactly two extreme tracial states, which are interchanged by the action .
Question 7.4**.**
Let be an infinite-dimensional simple unital C*-algebra with stable rank one, let be a finite group, and let be an action with the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Does it follow that and have stable rank one?
This is wanted for improvement of Corollary 5.6.
Question 7.5**.**
Are the stable rank one hypotheses in Proposition 5.9 and Corollary 5.6 really necessary?
That is, assuming the action has the Rokhlin property or weak tracial Rokhlin property as appropriate, does one get isomorphisms
[TABLE]
rather than just
[TABLE]
One possible generalization of the results of this paper is to the nonunital case. This will be treated in [5] (by a different set of authors). Complications include the additional complexity of the definition of the weak tracial Rokhlin property (see Definition 3.1 of [14]), and what to substitute for the conventional definition of the radius of comparison.
8. Acknowledgments
This research was done while the first author was a visiting scholar at the University of Oregon during the period March 2018 to September 2019. He is thankful to that institution for its hospitality. He was partially supported by the University of Tehran. This paper will be part of first authorâs PhD. dissertation.
The research of the third author was partially supported by the Simons Foundation Collaboration Grant for Mathematicians #587103.
The first author thanks Q. Wang for pointing out Corollary II.4.3 in [6]. All three authors would like to thank M. Amini, I. Hirshberg, and S. Jamali for sharing some of their unpublished work with us.
The first author is grateful to M. B. Asadi for motivating him to study operator algebras in the first year of his Ph.D. program.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] C. A. Akemann and F. Shultz, Perfect C*-algebras , Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 55 no. 326 (1985).
- 2[2] M. Amini, N. Golestani, S. Jamali, N. C. Phillips, Simple tracially đ” đ” \mathcal{Z} -absorbing C*-algebras , in preparation.
- 3[3] P. Ara, F. Perera, and A. S. Toms, K-theory for operator algebras. Classification of C*-algebras , pages 1â71 in: Aspects of Operator Algebras and Applications , P. Ara, F LledĂł, and F. Perera (eds.), Contemporary Mathematics vol. 534, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 2011.
- 4[4] D. Archey and N. C. Phillips, Permanence of stable rank one for centrally large subalgebras and crossed products by minimal homeomorphisms , J. Operator Theory, to appear.
- 5[5] M. A. Asadi-Vasfi, The Cuntz semigroup of the crossed product of a nonunital C*-algebra by a finite group , in preparation.
- 6[6] B. Blackadar and D. Handelman, Dimension functions and traces on C*-algebras , J. Funct. Anal. 45 (1982), 297â340.
- 7[7] L. G. Brown, Stable isomorphism of hereditary subalgebras of C*-algebras , Pacific J. Math. 71 (1977), 335â348.
- 8[8] J. Cuntz, Dimension functions on simple C*-algebras , Math. Ann. 233 (1978), 145â153.
