# Electron Impact Excitation of S III: an Assessment

**Authors:** K M Aggarwal

arXiv: 1908.05931 · 2019-08-19

## TL;DR

This paper critically assesses previous calculations of electron impact excitation data for S III, revealing significant underestimations in collision strengths and correcting the behavior of these values across transitions and temperatures.

## Contribution

It provides independent calculations using the FAC code that challenge and improve upon prior results for S III collision data, especially for effective collision strengths.

## Key findings

- Previous results underestimated collision strengths by up to a factor of two.
- Corrected collision strengths show different temperature dependence.
- Behavior of collision strengths for higher levels was previously incorrect.

## Abstract

In a recent paper, Tayal et al. [{\em Astrophys. J. Suppl.} {\bf 2019}, {\emph 242}, 9] have reported results for energy levels, radiative rates (A-values) and effective collision strengths ($\Upsilon$) for transitions among the 198 levels of Si-like S~III. For the calculations they have adopted the multi-configuration Hartree-Fock (MCHF) code for the energy levels and A-values, and B-spline $R$-matrix (BSR) code for $\Upsilon$. Their reported results appear to be accurate for energy levels and A-values, but not for $\Upsilon$. Through our independent calculations by adopting the flexible atomic code (FAC), we demonstrate that their reported results for $\Upsilon$ are underestimated, by up to a factor of two, and at all temperatures, particularly for the allowed transitions, but some forbidden ones too. Additionally, for transitions involving the higher levels the behaviour of their $\Upsilon$ results is not correct.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.05931/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.05931/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.05931/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.05931