# Measuring the Orbital Parameters of Radial Velocity Systems in Mean   Motion Resonance---a Case Study of HD 200964

**Authors:** M. M. Rosenthal, W. Jacobson-Galan, B. Nelson, R. A. Murray-Clay, J., A. Burt, B. Holden, E. Chang, N. Kaaz, J. Yant, R. P. Butler, and S. S. Vogt

arXiv: 1908.04789 · 2019-09-25

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the orbital parameters of the HD 200964 planetary system in mean motion resonance, emphasizing the importance of long-term stability analysis for accurate orbital characterization.

## Contribution

It introduces a method combining parameter space search and numerical stability testing to identify stable resonant configurations in RV data, including previously unconsidered resonances.

## Key findings

- Stable solutions in 7:5 and 3:2 MMRs identified
- The best fit to data is in the 7:5 resonance
- Long-term stability is crucial for accurate orbital fitting

## Abstract

The presence of mean motion resonances (MMRs) complicates analysis and fitting of planetary systems observed through the radial velocity (RV) technique. MMR can allow planets to remain stable in regions of phase space where strong planet-planet interactions would otherwise destabilize the system. These stable orbits can occupy small phase space volumes, allowing MMRs to strongly constrain system parameters, but making searches for stable orbital parameters challenging. Furthermore, libration of the resonant angle and dynamical interaction between the planets introduces another, long period variation into the observed RV signal, complicating analysis of the periods of the planets in the system. We discuss this phenomenon using the example of HD 200964. By searching through parameter space and numerically integrating each proposed set of planetary parameters to test for long term stability, we find stable solutions in the 7:5 and 3:2 MMRs in addition to the originally identified 4:3 MMR. The 7:5 configuration provides the best match to the data, while the 3:2 configuration provides the most easily understood formation scenario. In reanalysis of the originally published shorter-baseline data, we find fits in both the 4:3 and 3:2 resonances, but not the 7:5. Because the time baseline of the data is less than the resonant libration period, the current best fit to the data may not reflect the actual resonant configuration. In the absence of a full sample of the longer libration period, we find that it is of paramount importance to incorporate long term stability when fitting for the system's orbital configuration.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04789/full.md

## Figures

25 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04789/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04789/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04789