# The range of geometrical frustration in lattice spin models

**Authors:** Pierre Ronceray, Bruno Le Floch

arXiv: 1908.04285 · 2019-12-04

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a quantitative, scale-dependent framework for measuring geometrical frustration in lattice spin models, revealing that many frustrated systems have only finite-range frustration that can be locally eliminated.

## Contribution

It provides a novel, gauge-invariant method to quantify geometrical frustration in lattice models using local energy landscapes and optimization over local energy displacements.

## Key findings

- Many frustrated models exhibit only finite-range frustration.
- Geometrical incompatibilities can be eliminated by local energy coarse-graining.
- The framework is applicable to models like the antiferromagnetic Ising model on a triangular lattice.

## Abstract

The concept of geometrical frustration in condensed matter physics refers to the fact that a system has a locally preferred structure with an energy density lower than the infinite ground state. This notion is however often used in a qualitative sense only. In this article, we discuss a quantitative definition of geometrical frustration in the context of lattice models of binary spins. To this aim, we introduce the framework of local energy landscapes, within which frustration can be quantified as the discrepancy between the energy of locally preferred structures and the ground state. Our definition is scale-dependent and involves an optimization over a gauge class of equivalent local energy landscapes, related to one another by local energy displacements. This ensures that frustration depends only on the physical Hamiltonian and its range, and not on unphysical choices in how it is written. Our framework shows that a number of popular frustrated models, including the antiferromagnetic Ising model on a triangular lattice, only have finite-range frustration: geometrical incompatibilities are local and can be eliminated by an exact coarse-graining of the local energies.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04285/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04285/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04285/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.04285