# The Dust in M31

## TL;DR

This study uses Herschel data and the PPMAP method to analyze dust emission in M31 at high resolution, revealing discrepancies with existing dust models and suggesting the need for model revisions based on observed optical depths and dust properties.

## Contribution

It presents a detailed analysis of dust emission in M31 at 31 pc resolution, highlighting inconsistencies with theoretical dust models and proposing new constraints on dust properties.

## Key findings

- Observed tau_1.1/tau_300 ratio is 500-1500, lower than model predictions.
- Discrepancy suggests a large fraction of dust emission arises from compact sources.
- Anti-correlation between optical-depth weighted emissivity index and dust temperature.

## Abstract

We have analysed Herschel observations of M31, using the PPMAP procedure. The resolution of PPMAP images is sufficient (31 pc on M31) that we can analyse far-IR dust emission on the scale of Giant Molecular Clouds. By comparing PPMAP estimates of the far-IR emission optical depth at 300 microns (tau_300), and the near-IR extinction optical depth at 1.1 microns (tau_1.1) obtained from the reddening of RGB stars, we show that the ratio R_OBS.tau = tau_1.1/tau_300 falls in the range 500 to 1500. Such low values are incompatible with many commonly used theoretical dust models, which predict values of R_MODEL.kappa = kappa_1.1/kappa_300 (where kappa is the dust opacity coefficient) in the range 2500 to 4000. That is, unless a large fraction, at least 60%, of the dust emitting at 300 microns is in such compact sources that they are unlikely to intercept the lines of sight to a distributed population like RGB stars. This is not a new result: variants obtained using different observations and/or different wavelengths have already been reported by other studies. We present two analytic arguments for why it is unlikely that at least 60% of the emitting dust is in sufficiently compact sources. Therefore it may be necessary to explore the possibility that the discrepancy between observed values of R_OBS.tau and theoretical values of R_MODEL.kappa is due to limitations in existing dust models. PPMAP also allows us to derive optical-depth weighted mean values for the emissivity index, beta = - dln(kappa_lambda)/dln(lambda), and the dust temperature, T, denoted betabar and Tbar. We show that, in M31, R_OBS.tau is anti-correlated with betabar according to R_OBS.tau = 2042(+/-24)-557(+/-10)betabar. If confirmed, this provides a challenging constraint on the nature of interstellar dust in M31.