# Utility-Scale Energy Storage in an Imperfectly Competitive Power Sector

**Authors:** Vilma Virasjoki, Afzal Siddiqui, Fabricio Oliveira, Ahti Salo

arXiv: 1908.03167 · 2020-03-11

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes how market competition and investor objectives influence utility-scale energy storage investments in a renewable-heavy power sector, highlighting policy implications for market regulation.

## Contribution

It introduces a bi-level optimization model to assess storage investment impacts under different market and investor scenarios in a realistic Western Europe case study.

## Key findings

- Market competition significantly influences storage investment size and location.
- Consumers benefit more from storage investments than investors.
- Market power can lead to suboptimal storage deployment and locations.

## Abstract

Interest in sustainability has increased the share of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) in power generation. Energy storage systems' potential to mitigate intermittencies from non-dispatchable VRES has enhanced their appeal. However, the impacts of storage vary based on the owner and market conditions. We examine the policy implications of investments in utility-scale battery storage via a bi-level optimization model. The lower level depicts power system operations, modeled as either perfect competition or Cournot oligopoly to allow for the assessment of producer market power. The upper-level investor is either a welfare-maximizer or a profit-maximizing standalone merchant to reflect either welfare enhancement or arbitrage, respectively. We implement a realistic case study for Western Europe based on all possible size-location storage investment combinations. We find that market competition affects investment sizes, locations, and their profitability more than the investor's objectives. A welfare-maximizer under perfect competition invests the most in storage capacity. Consumers typically gain most from storage investments in all cases, exceeding the gains for the investors. Specifically, our results show that storage investments may either not occur or be located differently than at social optimum, if market power is exerted. Thus, policy makers need to anticipate producer market power when setting regulation.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.03167/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.03167/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.03167/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.03167