# Reply to P. Ao's Comment on "Sign reversing Hall effect in atomically   thin high temperature superconductors"

**Authors:** S.Y. Frank Zhao, Nicola Poccia, Margaret G. Panetta, Cyndia Yu,, Jedediah W. Johnson, Hyobin Yoo, Ruidan Zhong, G.D. Gu, Kenji Watanabe,, Takashi Taniguchi, Svetlana V. Postolova, Valerii M. Vinokur, Philip Kim

arXiv: 1908.02777 · 2019-08-09

## TL;DR

This paper refutes P. Ao's claim that vortex many-body effects cause Hall sign reversal in thin high-temperature superconductors, based on experimental evidence contradicting the theoretical predictions.

## Contribution

It provides experimental data that challenge the vortex many-body explanation for Hall sign reversal in atomically thin cuprate superconductors.

## Key findings

- Experimental results are incompatible with Ao's vortex effect predictions.
- Supports alternative mechanisms for Hall sign reversal.
- Clarifies the limitations of vortex many-body theories in this context.

## Abstract

We respond to P. Ao's comment in arXiv:1907.09263, which suggests that vortex many-body effects are the origin of Hall sign reversal in few-unit-cell thick Bi-2212 cuprate crystals (Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 247001 (2019)). Our experimental results are incompatible with the theoretical predictions detailed in Ao's comment.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02777/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02777/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02777/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02777