# Resolved and Integrated Stellar Masses in the SDSS-IV/MaNGA Survey,   Paper II: Applications of PCA-based stellar mass estimates

**Authors:** Zachary J. Pace, Christy Tremonti, Yanmei Chen, Adam L. Schaefer,, Matthew A. Bershady, Kyle B. Westfall, Joel Brownstein, Niv Drory, Mederic, Boquien, Kate Rowlands, Brett Andrews, David Wake

arXiv: 1908.02331 · 2019-10-11

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a PCA-based method for estimating galaxy stellar masses from spectra, compares it with other methods, and discusses systematic errors and biases in mass measurements using MaNGA survey data.

## Contribution

It presents a new PCA-based software for stellar mass estimation, evaluates its accuracy, and explores systematic errors and biases in mass measurements from integral field spectroscopy.

## Key findings

- PCA-based stellar mass estimates agree within 0.1 dex with previous photometric methods.
- Tension observed between stellar mass surface densities and dynamical measurements, possibly due to disk scale-height assumptions.
- Biases in total stellar mass estimates depend on dust extinction and star formation rate.

## Abstract

A galaxy's stellar mass is one of its most fundamental properties, but it remains challenging to measure reliably. With the advent of very large optical spectroscopic surveys, efficient methods that can make use of low signal-to-noise spectra are needed. With this in mind, we created a new software package for estimating effective stellar mass-to-light ratios $\log \Upsilon^*$ that uses principal component analysis(PCA) basis set to optimize the comparison between observed spectra and a large library of stellar population synthesis models. In Paper I, we showed that a with a set of six PCA basis vectors we could faithfully represent most optical spectra from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) survey;and we tested the accuracy of our M/L estimates using synthetic spectra. Here, we explore sources of systematic error in our mass measurements by comparing our new measurements to data from the literature. We compare our stellar mass surface density estimates to kinematics-derived dynamical mass surface density measurements from the DiskMass Survey and find some tension between the two which could be resolved if the disk scale-heights used in the kinematic analysis were overestimated by a factor of $\sim 1.5$. We formulate an aperture-corrected stellar mass catalog for the MaNGA survey, and compare to previous stellar mass estimates based on multi-band optical photometry, finding typical discrepancies of 0.1 dex. Using the spatially resolved MaNGA data, we evaluate the impact of estimating total stellar masses from spatially unresolved spectra, and we explore how the biases that result from unresolved spectra depend upon the galaxy's dust extinction and star formation rate. Finally, we describe a SDSS Value-Added Catalog which will include both spatially resolved and total (aperture-corrected) stellar masses for MaNGA galaxies.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02331/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02331/full.md

## References

70 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02331/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02331