# Holographic entanglement entropy is cutoff-covariant

**Authors:** Jonathan Sorce

arXiv: 1908.02297 · 2019-10-18

## TL;DR

This paper rigorously analyzes the cutoff dependence of holographic entanglement entropy in AdS/CFT, proving the regulator independence of the minimal surface prescription and the well-definedness of divergence-canceling quantities.

## Contribution

It provides a covariant, rigorous proof that the minimal surface prescription for holographic entanglement entropy is regulator-independent and well-posed in general relativity.

## Key findings

- Globally minimal surface choice is regulator-independent.
- Divergence-canceling sums like mutual information are well-defined.
- Supports the correctness of the minimal surface prescription in AdS/CFT.

## Abstract

In the AdS/CFT correspondence, it is often convenient to regulate infinite quantities in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes by introducing a sharp cutoff in a radial coordinate. This procedure is a priori coordinate-dependent, and may not be well-motivated in full, covariant general relativity; however, the fact that physically meaningful quantities such as the entanglement entropy can be obtained by such a regulation procedure suggests some underlying covariance. In this paper, we provide a careful treatment of the radial cutoff procedure for computing holographic entanglement entropy in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. We prove two results that are frequently assumed in the literature, but that have not been carefully addressed: (i) that the choice of a "globally minimal surface" among several extremal candidates is independent of the choice of regulator, and (ii) that finite CFT quantities such as the mutual information which involve "divergence-cancelling" sums of holographic entanglement entropies are well-defined. Our results imply that the "globally minimal surface" prescription for computing holographic entanglement entropy is well-posed from the perspective of general relativity, and thus support the belief that this is the correct prescription for identifying the entanglement wedge of a boundary subregion in AdS/CFT. We also comment on the geometric source of state-dependent divergences in the holographic entanglement entropy, and identify precisely the regime of validity of the "vacuum subtraction" protocol for regulating infinite entanglement entropies in arbitrary states by comparing them to the entanglement entropies of identical regions in the vacuum. Our proofs make use of novel techniques for the covariant analysis of extremal surfaces, which are explained in detail and may find use more broadly in the study of holographic entanglement entropy.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02297/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02297/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02297/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.02297