Megapixels @ Megahertz -- The AGIPD High-Speed Cameras for the European XFEL
Ulrich Trunk, Aschkan Allahgholi, Julian Becker, Annette Delfs,, Roberto Dinapoli, Peter G\"ottlicher, Heinz Graafsma, Dominic Greiffenberg,, Helmut Hirsemann, Stefanie Jack, Alexander Klyuev, Hans Kr\"uger, Manuela, Kuhn, Torsten Laurus, Alessandro Marras, Davide Mezza

TL;DR
The paper describes the development and deployment of the AGIPD high-speed, high-dynamic-range pixel detector for the European XFEL, capable of capturing rapid X-ray pulse trains with single photon sensitivity.
Contribution
It introduces the AGIPD ASIC and system design, enabling fast, sensitive imaging of XFEL pulses with high dynamic range and in-pixel memory, tailored for XFEL's demanding pulse structure.
Findings
Successful installation of 1 Mpixel detector at SPB station
Development of larger 4 Mpixel detector in progress
Implementation of Hi-Z sensor material for higher photon energies
Abstract
The European XFEL is an extremely brilliant Free Electron Laser Source with a very demanding pulse structure: trains of 2700 X-Ray pulses are repeated at 10 Hz. The pulses inside the train are spaced by 220 ns and each one contains up to photons of 12.4 keV, while being fs in length. AGIPD, the Adaptive Gain Integrating Pixel Detector, is a hybrid pixel detector developed by DESY, PSI, and the Universities of Bonn and Hamburg to cope with these properties. It is a fast, low noise integrating detector, with single photon sensitivity (for keV) and a large dynamic range, up to photons at 12.4 keV. This is achieved with a charge sensitive amplifier with 3 adaptively selected gains per pixel. 352 images can be recorded at up to 6.5 MHz and stored in the in-pixel analogue memory and read out between pulse trains. The core component of this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Megapixels @ Megahertz –
The AGIPD High-Speed Cameras for the European XFEL
Aschkan Allahgholi
Julian Becker
Annette Delfs
Roberto Dinapoli
Peter Göttlicher
Heinz Graafsma
Dominic Greiffenberg
Helmut Hirsemann
Stefanie Jack
Alexander Klyuev
Hans Krüger
Manuela Kuhn
Torsten Laurus
Alessandro Marras
Davide Mezza
Aldo Mozzanica
Jennifer Poehlsen
Ofir Shefer Shalev
Igor Sheviakov
Bernd Schmitt
Jörn Schwandt
Xintian Shi
Sergej Smoljanin
Ulrich Trunk
Jiaguo Zhang
Manfred Zimmer
Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron - DESY, Hamburg, Germany
Paul Scherrer Institut - PSI, Villigen, Switzerland
Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Mid-Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
Abstract
The European XFEL is an extremely brilliant Free Electron Laser Source with a very demanding pulse structure: trains of 2700 X-Ray pulses are repeated at . The pulses inside the train are spaced by and each one contains up to of , while being 100\text{,}\mathrm{fs}$$ in length. AGIPD, the Adaptive Gain Integrating Pixel Detector, is a hybrid pixel detector developed by DESY, PSI, and the Universities of Bonn and Hamburg to cope with these properties.
It is a fast, low noise integrating detector, with single photon sensitivity (for 6\text{,}\mathrm{keV}) and a large dynamic range, up to ${10}^{4}$ photons at $12.4\text{\,}\mathrm{keV}$. This is achieved with a charge sensitive amplifier with 3 adaptively selected gains per pixel. 352 images can be recorded at up to $6.5\text{\,}\mathrm{MHz}$ and stored in the in-pixel analogue memory and read out between pulse trains. The core component of this detector is the AGIPD ASIC, which consists of $64\times 64$ pixels of 200\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}200\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}$$. Control of the ASIC’s image acquisition and analogue readout is via a command based interface. FPGA based electronic boards, controlling ASIC operation, image digitisation and data transmission interface AGIPD detectors to DAQ and control systems.
An AGIPD detector has been installed at the SPB111Single particles, Clusters and Biomoleculesexperimental station in August 2017, while a second one is currently commissioned for the MID222Materials Imaging and Dynamicsendstation. A larger () AGIPD detector and one to employ Hi-Z sensor material to efficiently register photons up to 25\text{,}\mathrm{keV}$$ are currently under construction.
keywords:
AGIPD , X-Ray Detector , Photon Science , European XFEL , Free Electron Laser , Hybrid Pixel Detector
††journal: Nuclear Instrumentation and Methods A
1 The European XFEL
The European X-Ray Free Electron Laser (XFEL) [1, 2] in Hamburg is currently the most brilliant X-Ray source (fig. 1) in the world. It provides extremely focused, fully coherent X-Ray pulses. Trains of 2700 of these pulses are repeated at . The pulses inside the train are spaced by and contain up to {10}^{12}$\times$12.4\text{\,}\mathrm{keV} 333 is the maximum fundamental photon energy of the SASE1 and SASE2 undulators at the European XFEL, providing beam for the AGIPD-equiped instruments. photons each, while being 100\text{,}\mathrm{fs} in length (fig. [2](#S1.F2)). The high intensity per pulse will allow recording diffraction patterns of single molecules or small crystals in a single shot. As a consequence 2D detectors have to cope with a large dynamic range, requiring single photon sensitivity e.g. for single molecule imaging, and registering more than ${10}^{4}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{/}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l} in the same image for the case of liquid scattering or intense Bragg Spots444Droplets and ice crystals are frequently encountered in gas and liquid jet sample delivery setups. AGIPD is one of three detectors developed to cope with the timing requirements of the European XFEL[[3](#bib.bib3)]. The other two are the Large Pixel Detector (LPD) [[4](#bib.bib4)] with $$500\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}\times500\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}$$ pixel size and 1\text{,}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}installed, and DSSC [[5](#bib.bib5)], a1\text{,}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l} detector with $$200\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}\times$230\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}$$ hexagonal pixels, based on silicon drift diodes or Depfet sensors with Signal Compression (hence the acronym), currently under development. While LPD is targeted at the same energy range as AGIPD, it differs from it by a lower spatial and energy resolution, but covers a much bigger area and operates in ambient. DSSC like AGIPD operates in vacuum, but can detect lower photon energies - on the expense of a nonlinear response and a lower frame rate at low energies.
Future upgrades of the European XFEL planned for the half of the 2020ies include continuous wave (CW) operation at a pulse rate of 100\text{,}\mathrm{kHz} and a so-called long pulse mode at $\lessapprox$200\text{\,}\mathrm{kHz} with bursts repeating at [6]. At these rates moving or exchanging solid samples during a burst becomes feasible, which would reduce the radiation damage of samples considerably and thus enable european X FEL for new classes of experiments and materials. To exploit these modes new detectors with a different readout architecture are needed, since AGIPD hardware can555The firmware for the readout system would have to send commands to the ASIC in a different order only operate up to 16\text{,}\mathrm{kHz}$$ CW frame rate.
2 The AGIPD Detector
AGIPD [7, 8, 9, 10] is a hybrid pixel detector, developed by DESY, the Paul Scherrer Institute and the Universities of Bonn and Hamburg to meet the requirements for the use at the European XFEL. It consists of thick Silicon sensors, manufactured by SINTEF, Hamamatsu and ADCVACAM, to provide a high efficiency () up to photon energy. While the sensors efficiently sheild the ASICs underneath from radiation, the sensors themselves will collect a substantial amount of radiation dose during their expected lifetime. Special design measures have been taken to mitigate radiation damage and its effects [11]. Each sensor features pixels, which are 200\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}$\times$200\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m} in size and pitch as a good compromise. AGIPD ASICs are bump-bonded to each sensor for readout. Larger detector systems of 1- or 4-megapixels are composed by tiling these sensors666The minimum distance of the individual sensor tiles are in horizontal and in vertical direction respectively.. The high photon flux together with single photon sensitivity require the detector to operate in vacuum, in order to prevent the intense beam from interacting with ambient air or exit windows, which would cause a huge background. In turn a vacuum vessel is an integral part of the detectors. The detectors at the SPB and MID experimental stations have the sensor modules arranged on four movable quadrants777The AGIPD detector for the HIBEF endstation features a different layout. These can be arranged to form a hole for the direct beam to prevent it from hitting detector components and inflicting damage to the system. The intense beam and the experiments envisioned also require a huge dynamic range, which can reach at . To cope with this, AGIPD adaptively lowers the sensitivity of the preamplifiers, independently for each pixel in two steps. Furthermore the system has to comply with the rather inconvenient time structure of the European XFEL. Since it is not possible to read out an image within , the detector has to record as many images as possible during a pulse train and read these out during the 99.4 ms gap in-between the trains.
3 The AGIPD readout ASIC
The core functionality of the AGIPD detector is implemented in the readout ASIC [13, 14, 15]. It is manufactured in IBM/Global Foundries cmrf8sf () technology and contains pixels of 200\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}$\times$200\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}. The circuit in each pixel (fig. 3) contains a charge sensitive preamplifier based on an inverter core with threefold switchable gain. This gain switching is implemented by adding capacitors of and to the initial preamplifier feedback of . A discriminator is connected to the preamplifier output and triggers an adaptive gain selection, whenever this output exceeds a selected threshold. A correlated double sampling (CDS) stage removes reset and attenuates low-frequency noise components from the preamplifier output [16], such that the detection of single photons888down to 6\text{,}\mathrm{keV} with SNR $\rm\geq$5\text{\,}\sigma is feasible. The output of the CDS, as well as the selected gain is sampled in a capacitor based analogue memory for 352 images, which occupies about of a pixel’s area. It is based on n-FET in n-well capacitors and dual PMOS switches for radiation tolerance and low leakage, since the analogue signal must not deteriorate during several of storage time. For readout each pixel features a charge sensitive buffer. Last but not least each pixel features two sources of electrical stimuli: A constant curren source and a pulsed capacitor, which can be connected to the preamplifier input. A command based interface and control circuit provides random access to the memory and controls the row-wise readout of the data via multiplexers to four differential analogue ports. The random access scheme allows overwriting image data within a bunch train, which is compliant with the European XFEL’s vetoing schema to maximise efficiency. The data of individual ’amplitude’ and ’gain’ frames will be combined to single images by the readout electronics999The current firmware of the AGIPD detectors at SPB and MID reads 300 separate ’amplitude’ and ’gain’ frames, which are combined offline.. The power consumption of an ASIC is typically around at . To ensure sufficient radiation tolerance of the ASIC, individual components and building blocks have been tested for doses up to several , e.g. in [12].
3.1 ASIC Performance
All AGIPD systems currently in use are based on the AGIPD 1.1 version101010A breif description of earlier versions and prototypes of the ASIC can be found in [12]. of the ASIC, which has been thoroughly characterised electrically and with a sensor. Since the medium and low gain settings are not accessible with lab X-Ray sources, an IR laser has been used for characterisation. This way an ENC111111Equivalent Noise Charge of was measured121212Sacrificing dynamic range by selecting the high gain of the CDS, 240\text{,}\mathrm{e}^{-} can be reached., as fig. [4](#S3.F4) shows. This value corresponds to a signal to noise ratio $>$10\text{\,}\sigma for a single photon in the high gain [17]. Fig. 4 furthermore shows, that the noise in all gain settings is always less than the limit imposed by the Poisson statistics intrinsic to the discrete nature of the impinging photons.
The dynamic range was measured up to or of , as fig. 5 shows. The linear fits in fig. 5 also confirm a nonlinearity better than up to of . The sensitivity to single photons is confirmed by Fig. 6.
4 AGIPD Calibration Procedure
Calibrating a detector system with multiple gains is a non-trivial task, since the medium and low gain settings of the preamplifier are not easily accessible with radiation sources. While the intensity of the direct beams at FELs and synchrotrons might be sufficient to reach these, the statistics required for the necessary precision and the associated time and radiation load, which is expected to vastly exceed that of experiments, render this approach impractical. Instead a hybrid approach based on fluorescence photons and electrical stimuli provided by the in-pixel constant current source (c.f. sect.3) is used:
- •
Calibration of the preamplifiers high gain with fluorescence photons from Copper or Molybdenum targets.
- •
Scan of the preamplifiers integration time (from the nominal to several ) using the in-pixel current source to determine the sensitivity of the medium and low gain settings relative to the high gain.
A big advantage of this approach is the independence from the absolute value of the current, i.e. of variations in the ASIC’s manufacturing process or sensor leakage currents, whereas the indirect nature of the procedure and the long lever arm are mitigated by the Poissonian nature of photons, which relaxes requirements for higher intensities.
Using the DAQ system at the European XFEL, data for a full calibration can be acquired within less than , i.e. this can be conveniently performed before and after user experiments. From this data the 3 offsets (baseline) and gains have to be calculated. In addition gain and offset also depend on the size of the memory’s capacitors. This leads in total to . Calculating these constants requires 4\text{,}\mathrm{h}$$ on the DESY Maxwell computer cluster [19], and no further reduction of constants by disentanglement of the contributions from frontend and memory are performed. The calculation of the two threshold levels required to re-digitise the the gain information is also included in the calibration process. Remaining uncertainties in determining the gain even after calibration led to the further improved AGIPD 1.2 readout ASIC.
5 AGIPD Detector Systems at SPB & MID
The image planes of all AGIPD cameras are composed from Frontend Modules (FEM). These are constructed from Silicon sensor tiles, to which AGIPD ASICs are bump-bonded by means of Sn/Ag or Sn/Pb bumps. The sensor tiles are p-on-n type with implant sizes and metal overhangs specially tailored to avoid dead pockets, where charges would be trapped and contribute to radiation damage, as well as to facilitate bias voltages up to [11]. The latter is required to overcome so called plasma effects [18], when the impinging radiation e.g. on a Bragg spot creates charge carrier densities able to effectively shield of the drift field. For the first user experiments bias voltages of or were applied. Further parts of a frontend module are an LTCC131313Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramics carrier board, to which the sensor assemblies are glued and wire bonded and the copper interposer, to which the LTCCs are bolted. For the AGIPD detectors for SPB and MID four of these frontend modules are attached to a copper cooling block to form a quadrant. This way the temperature of the modules can be lowered to 0\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}$$. The quadrants of the systems at the SPB and MID experimental stations are attached to a wedge-shaped arrangement of linear stages and mounted inside a vacuum vessel, while the image plane sticks out of it. Connected to the experimental chamber vacuum levels down to have been reached during user operation141414AGIPD can also operated at ambient pressure, but coarse vacuum levels are – depending on sensor bias – forbidden by Paschen’s law.. The movable arrangement of the quadrants permits the formation of an arbitrary hole or slot for the direct beam to pass, while the wedge shaped stages allow the driving motors to be mounted outside the vessel – on the expense of loosing the orthogonality of the translation axes.
The 64 analogue signals of one frontend module are brought outside the detector’s vacuum vessel via the vacuum board, a PCB151515Printed Circuit Board with a flexible section to compensate for the motion of the quadrants, and a vacuum flange formed by another PCB serving as the vacuum barrier. Outside the vacuum vessel PCBs with receiver amplifiers and ADCs provide digitisation of the data with 14 bit quantisation. This data is then collected by an FPGA161616Field-Programmable Gate Array and sent on via an 10 GB optical ethernet link per FEM to the data acquisition system of the European XFEL, which combines the data of individual modules to full frames and passes them on to storage. A rendering of the detectors for the SPB and MID endstations is shown in fig. 7. The power consuption of such a system is about excluding cooling.
The AGIPD camara at SPB has seen continuous user operation since the first user experiments in September 2017, while an identical camera has been delivered to the MID endstation (fig. 8) in November 2018, which is currently being commissioned.
6 First User Experiments with AGIPD
Due to its unique sampling rate, radiation hardness and dynamic range characteristics, AGIPD has been employed for experiments already in its prototyping stage and was e.g. used for an experiment to determine the coherence of the beam at PETRA III [20]. The AGIPD system at the SPB station of the European XFEL was successfully demonstrated during the facility’s inauguration and has seen continuous use since the very first user experiments in September 2017. In that context already the very first user experiment facilitated MHz serial femtosecond crystallography (at , the rate of the accelerator during commissioning) for the first time and resolved the structure of CTX-M-14 \textbeta-lactamase for the first time [21]. The figures 9 and 10 show a diffraction pattern from Lysozyme also recorded during that experiment and powder diffraction rings from Lithium-Titanate which are used for the spatial calibration, including the tilt of individual sensor tiles with respect to the detector plane.
7 New AGIPD Detector Systems for SFX and HIBEF
For the SFX171717Serial Femtosecond Crystallography instrument at the European XFEL a AGIPD system is currently under construction. The image plane of this detector will consist of 56 sensors, arranged in a pattern, formed by two halves with a vertical gap. These halves can be translated in the horizontal plane. The range lateral with respect to the beam is , while longitudinally the image plane can be moved by upstream – through a giant gate valve of diameter into the experimental chamber. Unlike the systems, this system will use double FEMs, consisting of two LTCCs bolted to a cooled interposer. To cater the side-by-side arrangement of the sensors, which is incompatible with the arrangement of the readout electronics of the existing AGIPD systems at SPB and MID, and to implement lessons learned from these systems, a new readout board was designed.
7.1 New readout boards
During comissioning of the AGIPD system at SPB the vast number of connectors imposed a reliability problem, which required the external housings to be opened and the boards re-seated for proper contact. The same held, albeit to a lesser extent, true for the power supply cables, which also make moving the detector a major endeavour. A further shortcoming was the central generation of the ASIC commands by two Master FPGA boards, which led to signal integrity issues and a limited tunability of the ADC sampling phase. In turn the basic idea of the new readout board was the elimination of connectors and power supplies and a total modularity of the system. Thus the board houses all components to operate a (single) FEM as a stand-alone detector (see fig. 11). Therefore, it implements the following components:
- •
A HV DC/DC module to generate the sensor bias.
- •
A connector for a mezzanine board to implement backside pulsing of the sensor as an additional means of calibration [22].
- •
14-bit ADCs directly driven by the AGIPD ASICs.
- •
Cascaded switching and linear regulators to power the FEM’s ASICs
- •
A Xilinx™ Zynq™ SoC181818System-on-chip with DDR3 memory to control the ASICs, process the ADC data and send it on via a link.
- •
A microcontroller to implement secondary tasks like power sequencing, configuration and monitoring.
- •
A multimedia serialiser and deserialiser to interface with the European XFEL’s clock and control (C&C) and interlock systems.
- •
A single power connector and DC/DC converters to power the board.
- •
A Samtec™ FireFly™ [23] 4-channel optical transceiver for communications.
- •
Two Lemo™ sockets for triggered stand-alone operation of an FEM without C&C signals.
The four channels of the FireFly transceiver are allocated to the data transmission, control interface, the serialised signals of the C&C and interlock systems and an ethernet channel for debugging, which is not used during normal operation. Additional FireFly transceivers on the inside and outside of a vacuum flange re-group these signals such, that complete 4-channel ribbons with MTP connectors interface to the DAQ system, the control system and the receiver board, implementing the serialiser/deserialiser interface to the European XFEL’s C&C and interlock systems.
Since the readout boards are mounted within the vacuum vessel, a novell cooling concept is explored: Pairs of boards are attached to a liquid cooled heat exchanger by means of a ’Gap Filler’ thermal conductive plastic.
For the HIBEF191919Helmholtz International Beamline for Extreme Fields endstation a system, based on the new readout board is under construction. The image plane of this detector will be a fixed stack of eight double modules, with a small gap between the top and bottom four, to allow the direct beam to pass. For this detector’s image plane only a translation along the beam axis, i.e. to adjust the distance of the detector from the sample, is foreseen. Translations in the other 2 dimensions are accomplished by the detector bench, i.e. by moving the detector’s vacuum chamber. The biggest challenges for the HIBEF AGIPD detector system are the presence of pulsed high magnetic and electrostatic fields and photon energies 25\text{,}\mathrm{keV}$$. At such energies the silicon sensor of AGIPD becomes transparent, i.e. inefficient and the usage of a high-Z sensor material like GaAs mandatory.
8 ecAGIPD - An electron collecting AGIPD ASIC for HIBEF
Charge carrier lifetime – especially of holes – in high-Z semiconductor materials like GaAs and CdTe is short compared to elementary semiconductors like Si or Ge [24]. Recent advancements in the production of these sensor materials [25] mitigate effects like ’afterglow’ and ’polarisation’ (decribed in [26]) and made compound semiconductor sensors the subject of investigations for an alternative to Germanium sensors in high-flux – high-energy imaging detectors at FELs [27, 28, 29]. In addition sensors made from high-Z materials (including Germanium) do not show the defect mechanisms of silicon decribed in [30], while the high absorption of radiation in the sensor and the low cross section of silicon at high photon energies drastically reduces the dose deposited in the readout ASICs. However the current AGIPD ASICs (and sensors) are hole collecting devices, and thus not suitable for high-Z materials. For this reason an electron collecting version of the AGIPD ASIC, ecAGIPD, to equip the AGIPD camera at the HIBEF endstation with high-Z sensors is being developed.
The primary difference is the lowered baseline (operating point at 400\text{,}\mathrm{mV}) of the charge sensitive preamplifier. This is necessary to maintain a dynamic range of $\approx${10}^{4} photons towards the positive supply rail. Since the baseline is only minimally higher than an n-MOS’ threshold voltage, it requires the protection of the amplifier inputs and calibration stimuli sources to work from a negative potential, which was implemented using the triple well option of the GF process. These p-wells are biased below substrate potential to allow bias sources, input protection diodes, and n-MOS feedback switches to operate properly even in presence of large input charges. By these changes the performance of the preamplifier core actually improves with respect to the hole collecting version, as the simulation results in fig. 12 predict.
Further changes to the circuit are minor: Besides the obvious reversal of the discriminator’s polarity required for gain switching, also the levels encoding high and low gain and the pads of the differential analogue outputs were swapped. This way ecAGIPD will deliver the same signal polarities to the subsequent electronics facilitating the reuse of the existing firmware and calibration algorithms. The block schematic is shown in fig. 13. To evaluate the design AGIPD 0.6, a pixels prototype of ecAGIPD, has been manufactured and is currently characterised.
9 Going faster
European XFEL plans to introduce two additional bunch patterns in the half of the 2020ies [6]. These are foreseen to be
- •
CW operation at rate
- •
Long pulse mode with long bursts of 200\text{,}\mathrm{kHz}$$ pulses
and would result in an increase in brilliance, if the pulse parameters are kept202020Other limits, like e.g. heat load of superconducting accelerator parts might prevent an increase in brilliance.. The largest benefit of the CW mode is the ability exchange (or at least move) samples in-between pulses and this way reduce radiation damage to the sample and enable pulse-by-pulse experiments beyond jet based sample delivery.
The burst frame rate of an integrating detector like AGIPD is in principle only limited by the properties of sensor and preamplifier. For the future CW operation of the European XFEL, readout bandwidth will become a bottleneck. The AGIPD ASIC can cope with CW operation up to a frame rate of 16\text{,}\mathrm{kHz}$$ with original performance 212121This mode is used during the characterisation and wafer-level testing of single ASICs. The readout systems of the SPB and MID AGIPD cameras require a network and firmware upgrade to implement it.. At even higher rates (theoretically the ASIC can work at up to when omitting gain readout), the deterioration of the analogue readout signals due to e.g. skin effect222222At frequencies of several , signal currents will gradually start to flow only on the surface of a conductor, leading to a rise of impedance and a non-flat frequency response., and reflections232323Reflections, i.e. parts of a signal traveling an electrical transmission line in opposite direction, are generated at any discontinuity of impedance. This is predominantly visible for higher frequencies at e.g. connectors and non-matching termination resistors. will render operation impractical.
As a consequence, in-pixel digitisation becomes a must, while readout bandwidth remains one of the limiting factors. Assuming current technology (FireFly with ), data rates of about or at can be reached. Fig. 14 shows data rate as a function of pixel size and frame speed under these conditions.
An even more challenging problem for such detectors will be power dissipation, since dynamic gain switching requires the the preamplifier to be faster than the sensor’s charge collection time. Hence power consumption is inversely proportional to the pixel area and will not relax with the lower frame rate compared to the current detectors at the European XFEL. In turn pixels smaller than 100\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m}100\text{,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolMicro m} will result in a power dissipation of $\gtrapprox$4\text{\,}\mathrm{W}\text{\,}{\mathrm{cm}}^{-1}\text{\,}{\mathrm{}}^{2} and will be difficult to implement.
10 Summary
A AGIPD detector system has been installed at the SPB instrument of the European XFEL in August 2017. System fulfils all requirements, esp. in terms of noise, which is below (i.e. 1.2\text{,}\mathrm{keV}), single photon sensitivity, dynamic range ($\rm\geq${10}^{4}\text{\,}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s} at ) and speed( frame rate). This system has been extensively used in user operation since day one. Remaining shortcomings, like an increasing uncertainty of the gain determination during readout or a limited number of frames per burst are tackled by a new version of the readout ASIC (AGIPD 1.2, taped out in Aug. 2018) and ongoing firmware development.
An identical system has been delivered to the MID endstation in November 2018 and is currently being commissioned.
AGIPD systems of for the SFX endstation and of for HIBEF are currently under construction. These systems are based on a new readout board, which implements autonomous operation of each detector module from a single power supply and data transmission and communications purely via optical fibres. Since prototypes showed no issues, production of these boards has started. For these boards and for the sensor modules novel in-vacuum cooling concepts are evaluated. The AGIPD system for HIBEF will be equipped with sensors made from high-Z semiconductor material, for which an electron collecting version of the AGIPD ASIC (ecAGIPD) is being developed. A 16\text{,}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{x}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l} demonstrator has been manufactured and is awaiting evaluation. Since European XFEL will provide different pulse patterns in the $\rm 2^{nd}$ half of the 2020ies, we are studying concepts for an ultra high framerate ($\rm\geq$100\text{\,}\mathrm{kHz}) imager with in-pixel digitisation, where power consumption and readout bandwidth become limiting factors.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Europran XFEL, http://www.xfel.eu/en/index.php
- 2[2] M. Altarelli et al., [European X-ray Free Electron Laser. Technical Design Report], ISBN 978-3-935702-17-1 (2006), DOI:10.3204/DESY_ 06-097
- 3[3] H. Graafsma, ”Requirements for and development of 2 dimensional X-ray detectors for the European X-ray Free Electron Laser in Hamburg”, JINST 4, P 12011 (2009), DOI:10.1088/1748-0221/4/12/P 12011
- 4[4] M.C. Veale et al., ”Characterisation of the high dynamic range Large Pixel Detector (LPD) and its use at X-ray free electron laser sources”, JINST 12, P 12003 (2017), DOI:10.1088/1748-0221/12/12/P 12003
- 5[5] M. Donato rt al., ”First functionality tests of a 64 × 64 64 64 64\times 64 pixel DSSC sensor module connected to the complete ladder readout”, JINST 12, C 03025 (2017), DOI:10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/C 03025
- 6[6] R.Brinkmann et al., ”Prospects for CW and LP operation of the European XFEL in hard X-ray regime”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 786, 20 (2014), DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.039
- 7[7] J. Becker et al., ”The Adaptive Gain Integrating Pixel Detector at the European XFEL”, J. Synchrotron Rad. 26, 74-82 (2019), DOI:10.1107/S 1600577518016077
- 8[8] D. Greiffenberg et al.: ”The AGIPD detector for the European XFEL”, JINST 7, C 01103 (2012), DOI:10.1088/1748_0221/7/01/C 01103
