On the $k$-torsion of the module of differentials of order $n$ of hypersurfaces
Hern\'an de Alba, Daniel Duarte

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when the module of differentials of order n of a hypersurface point is free of k-torsion, linking algebraic properties to the hypersurface's singularities.
Contribution
It provides a new criterion for k-torsion freeness of higher-order differentials based on the singular locus of the local ring.
Findings
k-torsion freeness is characterized by the singular locus
The criterion applies to hypersurfaces at specific points
Links algebraic differential properties to geometric singularities
Abstract
We characterize the -torsion freeness of the module of differentials of order of a point of a hypersurface in terms of the singular locus of the corresponding local ring.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the -torsion of the module of differentials of order of hypersurfaces
Hernán de Alba
and
Daniel Duarte
D. Duarte (corresponding author), [email protected]
Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas - CONACYT, Calzada Solidaridad y Paseo de la Bufa, Zacatecas, Zac. 98000, Mexico
Abstract.
We characterize the -torsion freeness of the module of differentials of order of a point of a hypersurface in terms of the singular locus of the corresponding local ring.
Key words and phrases:
-torsion, high order differentials, hypersurfaces
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
13N05,13D07,13C12
H. de Alba was supported by CONACyT grant A1-S-30482
D. Duarte was supported by CONACyT grant 287622
1. Introduction
The module of Kähler differentials of a ring is a classical object in commutative algebra. Recall that for a -algebra , the module of Kähler differentials is defined as the quotient , where is the kernel of the multiplication map . More generally, the module of Kähler differentials of order can be defined as (see, for instance, [8, 12, 13]).
It is well-known that the module of differentials can be used to detect properties of the ring. For instance, under some hypothesis, the regularity of the localization of a finitely generated algebra is equivalent to the freeness of its module of differentials. An analogous statement holds for the module of high order differentials (this was proved for hypersurfaces in [4] and, in a more general context, in [5]).
We are interested in studying other properties of certain rings that can be detected through its module of differentials. Let be an affine variety over a perfect field . Suppose that is locally, at some point , a complete intersection. Denote as the corresponding local ring. It was proved by J. Lipman that being non-singular at in codimension 1 (resp. in codimension 2) is equivalent to the torsion freeness (resp. reflexiveness) of (see [10]). It was proved that the first statement of Lipman’s theorem also holds for the module of high order differentials in the case of hypersurfaces (see [4]).
There is a general notion of -torsion freeness for any , , that generalizes the notions of torsion freeness and reflexiveness (see [3] or section 3 below). The main goal of this paper is to prove that -torsion freeness of the module of high order differentials of a hypersurface can be characterized in terms of the singular locus.
Our approach to the problem is essentially the same as Lipman’s. After making a careful analysis of his proof, we realized that part of the arguments were valid in a much more general situation. In addition, a key ingredient in Lipman’s proof is the fact that the projective dimension of the module of differentials of a reduced locally complete intersection is less or equal than one. An analogous statement was proved in [4] for the module of high order differentials of hypersurfaces, allowing us to carry on with Lipman’s strategy. Finally, the last ingredient we need for our proof is a criterion of regularity for hypersurfaces in terms of the module of high order differentials.
2. Modules of Kähler differentials
In this paper, all rings we consider are assumed to be commutative and with a unit element.
Let be a -algebra. Denote the kernel of the homomorphism , . Giving structure of -module to by multiplying on the left, define the -module
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
[13, Definition 1.5] The -module is called the module of Kähler differentials of order n of over or the module of high order Kähler differentials. For , this is just the usual module of Kähler differentials of .
A classical result states that, under some hypothesis, the localization of a finitely generated algebra is regular if and only if is free (see, for instance, [7, Chapter II, Theorem 8.8]). Another result in this direction is the following theorem due to J. Lipman (the statement (1) was also proved by S. Suzuki in [15]).
Theorem 2.2**.**
[10, Proposition 8.1]** Let be the local ring of a point on an affine variety over a perfect field . Assume that is locally, at , a complete intersection. Then
- (1)
* is torsion free if and only if is non-singular in codimension 1 at .* 2. (2)
* is reflexive if and only if is non-singular in codimension 2 at .*
In the statement of the theorem, non-singular in codimension i at P means that , for all , where and .
The first statement of the theorem was generalized to the module of high order Kähler differentials of a hypersurface, following the strategy in [15].
Theorem 2.3**.**
[4, Theorem 4.3]** Let be the local ring of a point on an irreducible hypersurface over a perfect field . Then is torsion free if and only if is normal at .
In the next section we recall the notion of -torsion freeness of an -module, for any positive integer . If is Noetherian and reduced, then the notions of torsion freeness and reflexiveness correspond, respectively, to -torsion freeness and -torsion freeness. Our main goal in this paper is to generalize Theorem 2.3 to apply to -torsion freeness, for any .
3. A general theorem on -torsion freeness
In this section we recall the notion of -torsion freeness of a module. Then we give a characterization of this notion for modules having projective dimension less or equal than 1.
Let be a Noetherian ring and let be an -module. The dual of , denoted by , is the module . The bidual of is denoted by . The bilinear map defined by induces an -homomorphism , given by . For a given -homomorphism , we denote as the induced map .
Let us suppose that is a finite -module, i.e., is finitely generated. Since is Noetherian, is finitely presented, i.e., there exists an exact sequence
[TABLE]
where are finite free -modules. Let , which is known as the Auslander transpose of . In [2] it is shown that the previous sequence induces the following exact sequence:
[TABLE]
It is proved in [3] that for any , depends only on and not on the particular presentation , where and are projective -modules.
Remark 3.1**.**
Recall that an module is torsionless if is injective and that is reflexive if is an isomorphism. Let be the total quotient ring of . Then is called torsion free if the natural map is injective, where . It is known that . Thus, the concept of torsionless implies the concept of torsion free. If is Gorenstein and has no embedded primes then the concepts are equivalent (see [16, Theorem (A.1)]).
In view of (1), torsionless and reflexiveness are respectively equivalent to and . This leads us to the following general notion of -torsion freeness.
Definition 3.2**.**
[3] Let , . We say that the -module is -torsion free if , for .
We want to study the -torsion freeness of modules having projective dimension less or equal than one. For that, we need to recall some results concerning the grade and depth of modules.
Let be a Noetherian ring, be a finite -module and be an ideal of . Recall that the grade of the ideal over , denoted as , is the maximal size of a -regular sequence in . It is known that can be computed in the following way (see [6, Theorem 1.2.5]):
[TABLE]
We also define . In addition, for a local ring we denote . Then, by [6, Proposition 1.2.10] we have
[TABLE]
We also need some facts regarding Cohen-Macaulay rings. If is a finite-dimensional local Noetherian ring, then . Moreover, if is Cohen-Macaulay, from this inequality we deduce that
[TABLE]
With these tools at hand, now we can give a characterization of -torsion freeness for modules having projective dimension less or equal than one. This characterization is based on part of the proof of Lipman’s theorem 2.2.
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let be an -module and be the total quotient ring of . If , then .
Proof.
Let be the set of zero divisors of , i.e., . As , we have for every , which implies . Thus, there exists such that . Therefore . We conclude . ∎
Theorem 3.4**.**
Let be a Noetherian local ring with total quotient ring . Let be a finite -module with a finite projective resolution
[TABLE]
Let be a positive integer. Then is -torsion free if and only if , for any . Moreover, if is Cohen-Macaulay, is -torsion free if and only if , for any .
Proof.
Using the projective resolution of and the definition of , it follows that . As the functor commutes with localization, we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is the total quotient ring of , any non-unit of is a zero divisor of , so . Moreover , the last inequality is by hypothesis. Using the Auslander-Buchsbaum formula
[TABLE]
we conclude , so is projective. It follows that . By lemma 3.3, . It follows that is -torsion free if and only if for every .
On the other hand, for every if and only if . By (2), if and only if for every . If, in addition, is Cohen-Macaulay, by (3), if and only if for every . ∎
4. A characterization of -torsion freeness
Now we are ready to generalize Theorem 2.3 for any . Throughout this section we use the following notation:
- •
is a perfect field.
- •
, where is irreducible.
- •
.
- •
is the local ring of a closed point .
Our first goal is to describe the support of the module in terms of the singular locus of . First we need the following criterion of regularity for hypersurfaces in terms of the module of differentials of high order.
Proposition 4.1**.**
Let . Then is a regular ring if and only if is a free -module. In addition, in this case the rank of is , where .
Proof.
The “only if” part is well-known and holds in full generality (see, for instance, [9, Section 4.2]). We include the proof here for the sake of completeness.
If is a regular ring then is free of rank . In addition, in this case, , where denotes the nth-symmetric product. It follows that is free of rank . Using the exact sequences
[TABLE]
it follows by induction that is free of rank .
Now assume that is a free -module. We first show that the rank of this module is . Let be the sheaf of Kähler differentials of order of . By the assumption, there exists an open subset such that and is free. In particular, is a free -module for all . Since is irreducible, is irreducible as well, and so the rank of is constant in . Let be a non-singular point (it exists because is irreducible and so and the open subset of non-singular points of are dense). By the “only if” part of the proposition, is free of rank . It follows that the rank of is also .
Now we show that free implies that is regular. We can assume that is a principal open set. Since is commutative with unit, there exists a maximal ideal such that [1, Corollary 1.4]. Then Since , it follows that is free of rank . By [4, Theorem 3.1], being a maximal ideal implies that is a regular ring . We conclude that is also a regular ring. ∎
Remark 4.2**.**
It was proved in [5, Theorem 10.2] that the previous criterion of regularity holds more generally for local domains with pseudocoefficient field such that Frac is separable over and is perfect. In particular, it holds for arbitrary irreducible varieties. In addition, an algebraic proof of the second part of the proposition can also be deduced from [5, Proposition 2.20].
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let be a Noetherian local ring and a finite -module such that . Then if and only if is free.
Proof.
Suppose that , so for any -free module . As there exists an exact sequence
[TABLE]
where and are finite free -modules. Thus,
[TABLE]
Therefore, there exists such that ; then splits and . Thus is projective and since is a Noetherian local ring we conclude that is free.
The converse of this lemma is immediate, because is projective if and only if for every -module . ∎
The next corollary follows the line of the proof of [10, Proposition 5.2]. The crucial additions are proposition 4.1 and the fact that has projective dimension less or equal than 1.
Corollary 4.4**.**
With the established notation,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be such that is regular. Then is a free -module and so the same is true for . Since the module of differentials of high order commutes with localization ([12, Theorem II-9]), lemma 4.3 implies
[TABLE]
This shows that .
Now let be such that . This implies . By [4, Theorem 4.3], . Thus, by lemma 4.3, is a free -module. On the other hand, by the correspondence of prime ideals in and , we have . In particular, is a free -module. By proposition 4.1, is a regular ring. Thus is regular and so . ∎
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let . Then is -torsion free if and only if is non-singular in codimension at .
Proof.
As before, . Consider the following projective resolution of :
[TABLE]
Since is Cohen-Macaulay, we can apply theorem 3.4 to obtain that is -torsion free if and only if for any . In addition, using the previous exact sequence we obtain . By corollary 4.4 we conclude that is -torsion free if and only if for any . ∎
Remark 4.6**.**
Notice that the entire strategy to prove theorem 4.5 can also be used to generalize Lipman’s theorem 2.2 for -torsion, for any .
Remark 4.7**.**
One of the key ingredients of the proof of Theorem 4.5 was the fact that , where is a local ring of an irreducible hypersurface. If this fact were also true for reduced complete intersections, then exactly the same strategy would give the analogous statement of Theorem 4.5 in this case. In this regard, an explicit presentation of was recently given in [4, Theorem 2.8] for any finitely generated -algebra . Using this presentation one could try to compute the projective dimension of , at least in some examples of complete intersections. Unfortunately, due to the size of the matrix giving the presentation, we did not succeed in computing any example for , even with the help of a (modest) computer.
Remark 4.8**.**
Even though the main goal of this paper was to generalize theorem 2.3, the results presented in section 3 apply to more general modules satisfying, among other hypothesis, that their projective dimension is less or equal than one. Families of modules satisfying this hypothesis can be constructed as in [17, Remark 2.1], [11, Lemma 1], or [14, Proposition 1.6].
Acknowledgements
We want to thank the referee for her/his comments that improved the presentation of the paper and for the suggestions to simplify some of our proofs.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Atiyah, I. G. Mac Donald, Introduction to Commutative Algebra , Addison-Wesley Series in Mathematics, 1969.
- 2[2] M. Auslander; Coherent Functors, Proceedings of the Conference Categorical Algebra, La Jolla 1965, Springer Verlag, 1966.
- 3[3] M. Auslander, M. Bridger; Stable Module Theory, Memoir of the American Mathematical Society, 94. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1969.
- 4[4] P. Barajas, D. Duarte; On the module of differentials of order n of hypersurfaces , J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 224(2), (2020), 536-550.
- 5[5] H. Brenner, J. Jeffries, L. Núñez-Betancourt, Quantifying singularities with differential operators , Adv. Math, 358, (2019).
- 6[6] W. Bruns, J. Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay rings, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- 7[7] R. Hartshorne; Algebraic Geometry , Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol. 52, 1977.
- 8[8] A. Grothendieck; Éléments de géometrie algébrique IV, Quatrième partie , Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes des schémas, Publ. Math. IHES 32 (1967).
