Equivalence of the categories of group triples and of hypergroups over the group
Samuel Dalalyan

TL;DR
This paper proves an equivalence between the category of hypergroups over a group and the category of triples consisting of a group, a subgroup, and a transversal, establishing a fundamental structural correspondence.
Contribution
It establishes a categorical equivalence between hypergroups over a group and triples of groups, subgroups, and transversals, revealing a deep structural connection.
Findings
Categories of hypergroups over a group and triples are equivalent.
Provides a new perspective on the structure of hypergroups.
Bridges concepts in group theory and hyperstructure theory.
Abstract
The main result of this paper is that the categories of (right) hypergroups over the group and of triples, consisting of a group, its subgroup and a (right) transversal to this subgroup, are equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Finite Group Theory Research · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
Equivalence of the categories of group triples and of hypergroups over the group
**Samuel Dalalyan
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics,
Yerevan State University, Armenia **
Abstract
The main result of this paper is that the categories of (right) hypergroups over the group and of triples, consisting of a group, its subgroup and a (right) transversal to this subgroup, are equivalent.
Keywords: category, equivalence, hypergroup over the group, group triple.
Introduction.
The concept of a (right) hypergroup over the group was introduced in [2] and was refined in [3] and [4]. This concept generalizes and unifies the concepts of the group, of the field and of the linear space over the field. The hypergroups over the group are already successfully applied to the generalization of the Schreier theorem about group extensions ([4]), in the theory of group cohomology and in some other areas.
All (right) hypergroups over the group and their morphisms determine a category, which is denoted . On the other hand, we consider the category of (right) group triples and their morphisms. The objects of this category are (right) group triples , where is a group, is a subgroup of and is a (right) transversal to the subgroup . The group triples generalizes the short exact sequence of groups together with a fixed section. The main result of this article is the following theorem.
Theorem 1. The categories and are equivalent.
To prove this theorem, we need to construct two functors
and
such that the composites and are naturally isomorphic to the identity functors and .
The present paper consists of this Introduction and five sections. In section 1 the category of (right) hypergroups over the group and in section 2 the category of (right) group triples are defined. In section 3 the functor and in section 4 the functor are constructed. In section 5 the main results of this paper (Theorem 1) is proved.
Remark. Most recently, after the writing of this article, the author became aware of the article [11]. The paper [11] is written on the basis of the same ideas, as our paper. However it must be emphasized, that the main object entered into circulation in [11] and called the , is a special case of the hypergroup over the group. The notion c-group coincides with the our notion unitary hypergroup over the group ([12]). Accordingly, all results of [11] follow from the corresponding results of the papers [3], [4]. In addition, I would like to especially note that we use a notation system, which helps to better represent and memorize all relationships in this new theory.
1. The category of hypergroups over the group. Let be a set, the elements of will be denoted by small Latin letters, be a group, the elements of will be denoted by small Greek letters. Consider the Cartesian products and , and four mappings
[TABLE]
for which the following denotations are used:
[TABLE]
and let .
Consider the following conditions on mappings of this system.
P1) The mapping is a binary operation on with the properties
(i) any equation with elements has a unique solution in ;
(ii) there exists a left neutral element , i.e. satisfies the condition for any element .
P2) The mapping is a (right) action of the group on , that is
(i) for any elements and ;
(ii) for any , where is the neutral element of the group .
P3) The mapping sends the subset of on .
P4) The mappings of the system satisfy the following identities:
- •
,
- •
,
- •
,
- •
,
- •
.
Definition 1.1. A (right) hypergroup over the group is an object, which is defined by a database, consisting of
-
a (basic) set ,
-
a group ,
-
a system of (structural) mappings ,
for which the conditions P1) - P4) are satisfied. Such a hypergroup over the group is denoted by . Dually a left hypergroup over the group is defined.
In algebra the term hypergroup is already used in an entirely different sense (see [5], [6], also [7]). In this paper only the right hypergroups over the group are used and they are often shortly named hypergroups.
Proposition 1.1. Any hypergroup has the following additional properties:
- •
* ;*
- •
* ;*
- •
* ;*
- •
* ,*
- •
* ;*
- •
* .*
where are arbitrary elements, is the left neutral element of the binary operation , is the neutral element of the group and .
Definition 1.2. Let and be hypergroups with systems of structural mappings and , respectively. A morphism
[TABLE]
of hypergroups over the group is a pair , consisting of a homomorphism of groups and of a map of sets , preserving the structural mappings, i.e. satisfying the following relations:
- •
,
- •
,
- •
,
- •
.
Remark 1.1. The condition means that is a homomorphism from to . It is not difficult to check that if and satisfy the condition P1) with left neutral elements , respectively, and is a homomorphism from to , then .
Remark 1.2. Any morphism sends the element to the element , where and are left neutral elements of and , respective,y. This immediately follows from .
The simplest example of a morphism of hypergroups is the identity morphism of an hypergroup :
[TABLE]
where and are the identity maps of and . For arbitrary morphisms of hypergroups
[TABLE]
the composite is a morphism of hypergroups, as well. The composite of morphisms of hypergroups satisfies the associative law:
[TABLE]
and the neutrality law for identical morphisms is true:
[TABLE]
Thus, the classes of hypergroups over the group and their morphisms determine a category, the category of (right) hypergroups over the group, which is denoted by .
Example 1.1. Any group can be considered as a hypergroup over the trivial group . Then
-
there exist, evidently, unique (and trivial) mappings and ,
-
the mapping , satisfying P2(ii), also determined uniquely.
Concerning , we take it coincide with the binary operation of the group . This system of mappings will satisfy the conditions P1) - P4). Consequently, we obtain a hypergroup .
For any homomorphism of groups , a (unique) morphism of hypergroups is determined.
Thus, we obtain a natural embedding of the category of groups into the category .
Emphasize that for any hypergroup over the trivial group , we have that is a group. Indeed, in this case according to (A4) and P2) (ii) the binary operation is associative, and this assertion follows from the well known facy, that any binary operation, which satisfies the conditions P1) and the associative law, is a group operation.
Example 1.2. A hypergroup over the group can be canonically associated to any field in a following way. Let be the additive group, be the multiplicative group of . Define the system of structural mappings in such a manner:
-
is the addition operation of ;
-
is the product in ;
-
for any ;
-
, where and is the neutral element of .
These mappings satisfy the conditions P1) - P4), consequently, we get a hypergroup over the group , associated with the field .
Let be a (mono)morphism of fields, be the corresponding monomorphism of additive groups, be the corresponding monomorphism of multiplicative groups of these fields. Then gives a morphism of hypergroups over the group. Therefore there is a natural embedding from the category of fields into the category of hypergroups over the group.
Example 1.3. Similarly by considering for any linear space over the field a hypergroup , where is the additive group of , is the multiplicatove group of the field , a maturel embedding from the category of lunear spaces over the field into the category is determined.
2. The category of group triples. Let be a group, be its subgroup. A subset of is called
(rt) a right transversal to the subgroup if any coset , has a unique common element with the set ;
(rcs) a right complementary set to the subgroup if for any element there exists a unique representation , where , .
This two conditions on the subset are equivalent (see, for example, [8]).
Definition 2.1. A right group triple is a triple, consisting of a group , of a subgroup of and of a right transversal to the subgroup . Dually a left group triple is defined.
A group triple can be considered as is a generalization of a short exact sequence of groups
[TABLE]
together with a fixed section . Such an object we denote by . The image of is a normal subgroup of , the image of is simultaneously a left and a right transversal to . Thus, we get a group triple , which is simultaneously left and right group triple.
Further we consider only the right group triples and omit the word right.
Definition 2.2. A morphism of group triples
[TABLE]
is a group homomorphism such that
[TABLE]
The composite of morphisms and is defined by the composite of corresponding group homomorphisms. The identity morphism is determined by the identity map . The class of all group triples together with all their morphisms determines a category, the category of group triples which is denoted .
Note that the class of all short exact sequences of groups with a section together with all their morphisms determines a full subcategory of the category .
3. A standard construction for obtaining hypergroups over the group. There is a standard method for obtaining hypergroups over the group. Let be an arbitrary group triple. Since is a right complementary set to the subgroup of , for any elements and the elements and are uniquely represented as products of elements of and . Consequently, one can define
[TABLE]
by using the relationships (St1) and (St2):
- •
,
- •
.
Thus we have a system of mappings , canonically associated to any group triple .
Proposition 3.1. For any group triple the canonically associated system of mappings satisfies the properties P1)-P4), consequently, determines a (right) hypergroup over the group .
It is said that this hypergroup over the group is obtained from the group triple by the standard construction.
Proof. According to associative law of group binary operation we have
[TABLE]
for every . Applying the relations (St1), (St2) and the property (cs) of uniqueness for the representation any element of as a product of elements from and , we get, respectively, the pairs of relations P2(i) and (A1), (A2) and (A3), (A4) and (A5).
Similarly, using the equalitiy , where and is the neutral element of (and consequently, of ), we get the relations P2(ii) and (A6).
Let the elements are uniquely determined by the relation . Then using the equality
[TABLE]
one can obtain the relations (A7) and (A8). The first of this relations implies P3).
By the equality
[TABLE]
the property P1(ii) and the relation (A9) are obtained. As consequence of (A9) we get that . Finally, the property P1(i) follows immediately from the following Lemma.
Lemma 3.1. For elements the relations and are equivalent.
(Note that has a unique element, since is a right transversal to .)
The Lemma 3.1 is true, because
[TABLE]
Let be a morphism of group triples, and be the associated with the given triples hypergroups over the group. Then by restrictions of the corresponding group homomorphism we get a group homomorphism and a map of sets such that is a morphism of hypergroups.
Let , be the classes of objects and , be the classes of morphisms of corresponding categories. Consider the mappings , which sends any group triple to the associated with him hypergroup over the group, and , which sends any morphism of triples to the corresponding morphism of associated hypergroups. The pair determines a (covariant) functor from to .
4. The exact product, associated with hypergroups over the group. In this section the functor is defined. This definition is based on the construction of exact product, associated with a hypergroup over the group.
Let be an arbitrary hypergroup over the group. Consider the set of all two-letter words , where and . Define the product of two such words by formula
[TABLE]
Proposition 4.1. The set of all two-letter words together with the above defined binary operation forms a group.
This group is called the exact product, associated wit the hypergroup over the group , and is denoted .
Proof. The associative law of the considered operation:
[TABLE]
for any two-letter words , is true, because
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Here
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
according to (A1), (A3), (A5), (A2), and
[TABLE]
according to (A2), (A4).
Similarly is checkes that is a left neutral element for the considered operation.
Now we check that for any two-letter words there exists a unique two-letter word such that . This equation is equivalent to the relation
[TABLE]
and, consequently, to the pair of relations
[TABLE]
By using the denotation for the unique solution of the equation we get that the last system of two equations has exactly one solution
[TABLE]
The Proposition 4.1 is proved.
Example 4.1. Let be a hypergroup over the group with trivial structural mappings , i.e.
[TABLE]
for any . Then is a group and the exact product, associated with the hypergroup , coincides with the direct product of groups and .
Example 4.2. Suppose that only the structural mappings and of the hypergroup are trivial. Then again is a group and the exact product, associated with the hypergroup , is a semidirect product of by .
Example 4.3. If only the structural mapping is trivial, then is a group as well, and the corresponding exact product is the general product of and in the sense of B. Neumann ([9], see also [10], p. 485).
Thus, the notion of the exact product, associated with a hypergroup over the group, generalizes the notions of the direct product, of the semidirect product and of the general product of two groups.
Let be an arbitrary hypergroup over the group and . Consider the maps
[TABLE]
and their images , .
Then is a subgroup of isomorphic to , and the subset of is bijective to and is a complementary set to the subgroup .
Thus, there exists a canonical mapping for classes of objects of the corresponding categories
[TABLE]
Now let be a morphism of hypergroups, and be the corresponding group triples. Let the map is defined by formula
[TABLE]
Then is a group homomorphism and determines a morphism of group triples
[TABLE]
Thus, there is a canonical mapping
[TABLE]
The pair of mappings gives a (covariant) functor from to .
5. Proof of equivalence of categories and . The proof of the relation is based on the following result.
Proposition 5.1. (The universal property of the standard construction of hypergroups over the group.) *By the standard construction of hypergroups over the group, any hypergroup over the group (up to isomorphism) can be obtained from a group triple. More exactly, let be an arbitrary hypergroup over the group, be the group triple, canonically associated with , be the hypergroup over the group, obtained by the standard construction from the group triple . Then there exists a canonical isomorphism . *
Proof. Let , where
[TABLE]
are, respectively, an isomorphism of groups and a bijection of sets. To check the conditions for the pair , we note that they have the following form:
[TABLE]
The lemma 5.1 is proved by a direct calculation.
Lemma 5.1. For any elements .
According this Lemma
[TABLE]
and using the definition of the multiplication in and the relations (A1), (A11), (A10), P2(i), (A6) we obtain
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and similarly
[TABLE]
Corollary 5.1.1. By the system of isomorphisms
[TABLE]
an isomorphism of functors is determined.
Proof. By a direct calculation it is proved that for any morphism of hypergroups we have a commutative square
.
(Here, the upper and lower horizontal arrows represent the morphisms and , respectively.)
Similarly a natural isomorphism is constructed..
Proposition 5.2. (The universal property of the exact product, associated with hypergroups over the group.) Any group triple is isomorphic to a group triple, associated with a hypergroup over the group. More exactly, let be an arbitrary group triple, be the hypergroup, obtauned by the standard construction from , be the exact product, associated with . Let the map is defined by , where . This map is a group homomorphism and determines a canonical isomorphism of group triples .
Corollary 5.2.1. Let be an arbitrary morphism of group triples, while and be the canonical isomorphisms, associated with triples , and . Then .
This terminate the proof of the equivalence of categories and .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Mac Lane S., Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
- 2[2] Dalalyan S. H.. On hypergroups, prenormal subgroups and simplest groups, Conf. dedicated to 90-aniversary of M. M. Djrbashyan, Yerevan, (2008), 27-28. (In Russian).
- 3[3] Dalalyan S. H., Structures induced on ttansversals to subgroups of a group and hypergroups over the group,
- 4[4] Dalalyan S. H., Hypergroups over the group and generalizations of Shreier’s theorem on group extensions, ar Xiv: 1403. 6134 v 1 [math. GR], 24 Mar 2014.
- 5[5] Marty F., Sur une generalisation de la notion de group , 8‘eme Course Math. Scandinaves Stockholm, 1934, 45-49.
- 6[6] Wall H. S., Hypergroups , Amer J Math 59, (1937), 77-98.
- 7[7] Litvinov G. L., Hypergroups and hypergroup algebras , results of science and techn. Ser. Lies. probl. mat. Beg. of achievement, 26, VINITI, Moscow, 1985, 57-106. (In Russian).
- 8[8] Rotman J. J., An Introduction to the Theory of Groups , Springer-Verlag, 1994.
