# On standardizing kilonovae and their use as standard candles to measure   the Hubble constant

**Authors:** Michael W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, Jack Heinzel, Nandita Khetan, Sarah, Antier, Mattia Bulla, Nelson Christensen, David A. Coulter, Ryan J. Foley

arXiv: 1908.00889 · 2020-04-15

## TL;DR

This paper explores standardizing kilonovae as independent standard candles to measure the Hubble constant, offering a potential alternative to gravitational-wave methods with comparable accuracy.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel approach applying supernova standardization techniques to kilonovae, independent of gravitational-wave data, to estimate the Hubble constant.

## Key findings

- Hubble constant estimates around 85-109 km/s/Mpc with large uncertainties
- Method shows promise as an independent H0 measurement
- Error bars comparable to gravitational-wave measurements

## Abstract

The detection of GW170817 is revolutionizing many areas of astrophysics with the joint observation of gravitational waves and electromagnetic emissions. These multi-messenger events provide a new approach to determine the Hubble constant, thus, they are a promising candidate for mitigating the tension between measurements of Type Ia supernovae via the local distance ladder and the Cosmic Microwave Background. In addition to the "standard siren" provided by the gravitational-wave measurement, the kilonova itself has characteristics that allow to improve existing measurements or to perform yet another, independent measurement of the Hubble constant without gravitational-wave information. Here, we employ standardization techniques borrowed from the type-Ia community and apply them to kilonovae, not using any information from the gravitational-wave signal. We use two versions of this technique, one derived from direct observables measured from the lightcurve, and the other based on inferred ejecta parameters, e.g., mass, velocity, and composition, for two different models. These lead to Hubble Constant measurements of $H_0 = 109^{+49}_{-35}$\,km $\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ $\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ for the measured analysis, and $H_0 = 85^{+22}_{-17}$\,km $\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ $\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ and $H_0 = 79^{+23}_{-15}$\,km $\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ $\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ for the inferred analyses. This measurement has error bars within ~$\sim$\,2 to the gravitational-wave measurements ($H_0=74^{+16}_{-8}$\,km $\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ $\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$), showing its promise as an independent constraint on $H_0$.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.00889/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.00889/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.00889/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1908.00889