The character graph of a finite group is perfect
Mahdi Ebrahimi

TL;DR
This paper proves that the character graph of any finite group, based on irreducible character degrees, is always perfect and that its complement has a chromatic number at most three, linking group theory and graph theory.
Contribution
The paper establishes that the character graph of a finite group is always perfect and bounds the chromatic number of its complement, providing new insights into the structure of character graphs.
Findings
The character graph of any finite group is perfect.
The chromatic number of the complement of the character graph is at most three.
Links between group theory and perfect graph theory are demonstrated.
Abstract
For a finite group , let denote the character graph built on the set of degrees of the irreducible complex characters of . In graph theory, a perfect graph is a graph in which the chromatic number of every induced subgraph of equals the clique number of . In this paper, we show that the character graph of a finite group is always a perfect graph. We also prove that the chromatic number of the complement of is at most three.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The character graph of a finite group is perfect
Mahdi Ebrahimi111 [email protected]
School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM),
P.O. Box: 19395–5746, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
For a finite group , let denote the character graph built on the set of degrees of the irreducible complex characters of . In graph theory, a perfect graph is a graph in which the chromatic number of every induced subgraph of equals the clique number of . In this paper, we show that the character graph of a finite group is always a perfect graph. We also prove that the chromatic number of the complement of is at most three.
Keywords: Character graph, Character degree, Perfect graph.
AMS Subject Classification Number: 20C15, 05C17, 05C25.
1 Introduction
Let be a finite group . Also let be the set of all character degrees of , that is, , where is the set of all complex irreducible characters of . The set of prime divisors of character degrees of is denoted by . It is well known that the character degree set may be used to provide information on the structure of the group . For example, Ito-Michler’s Theorem [10] states that if a prime divides no character degree of a finite group , then has a normal abelian Sylow -subgroup. Another result due to Thompson [13] says that if a prime divides every non-linear character degree of a group , then has a normal -complement.
A useful way to study the character degree set of a finite group is to associate a graph to . One of these graphs is the character graph of [9]. Its vertex set is and two vertices and are joined by an edge if the product divides some character degree of . We refer the readers to a survey by Lewis [7] for results concerning this graph and related topics.
Let be a finite simple graph with the vertex set and edge set . A clique of is a set of mutually adjacent vertices, and that the maximum size of a clique of , the clique number of , is denoted by . Minimum number of colors needed to color vertices of the graph so that any two adjacent vertices of have different colors, is called the chromatic number of and denoted by . Clearly for any graph . The graph is perfect if , for every induced subgraph of .
The theory of perfect graphs relates the concept of graph colorings to the concept of cliques. Aside from having an interesting structure, perfect graphs are considered important for three reasons. First, several common classes of graphs are known to always be perfect. For instance, bipartite graphs, chordal graphs and comparability graphs are perfect. Second, a number of important algorithms only work on perfect graphs. Finally, perfect graphs can be used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from scheduling to order theory to communication theory.
One of the turning point for the investigation on the character degree graph is the ”Three-Vertex Theorem” by Palfy [12]: the complement of does not contain any triangle whenever is a finite solvable group. In a recent paper [1] this was extended by showing that, under the same solvability assumption, the complement of dose not contain any cycle of odd length, which is equivalent to say that the complement of is a bipartite graph. Thus as the complement of a perfect graph is perfect [8], the character graph of a solvable group is perfect. This argument motivates an interesting problem: is the character graph of an arbitrary finite group perfect?. In this paper, we wish to solve this problem.
Theorem A. *Let be a finite group then is a perfect graph.
Theorem A will be used to determine the chromatic number of the complement of .
Corollary B. * Suppose is a finite group. Then the chromatic number of the complement of is at most three. *
2 Preliminaries
In this paper, all groups are assumed to be finite and all graphs are simple and finite. For a finite group , the set of prime divisors of is denoted by . Also note that for an integer , the set of prime divisors of is denoted by . We begin with Corollary 11.29 of [6].
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let and . Let be a constituent of . Then divides .
Let be a graph with vertex set and edge set . A cycle on vertices , , is a graph whose vertices can be arranged in a cyclic sequence in such a way that two vertices are adjacent if they are consecutive in the sequence, and are non-adjacent otherwise. A cycle with vertices is said to be of length and is denoted by , i.e., . The join of graphs and is the graph together with all edges joining and . An independent set is a set of vertices of a graph such that no two of them are adjacent. A maximum independent set is an independent set of largest possible size. This size is called the independence number of and is denoted by . Finally we should mention that the complement of and the induced subgraph of on are denoted by and , respectively. For more details, we refer the reader to basic textbooks on the subject, for instance [3]. Now we present some properties of perfect graphs.
Lemma 2.2**.**
[8]** A graph is perfect if and only if the complement of is perfect.
Lemma 2.3**.**
[4]** A graph is perfect if and only if it has no induced subgraph isomorphic either to a cycle of odd order at least 5, or to the complement of such a cycle.
We now state some relevant results on character graphs needed in the next section.
Lemma 2.4**.**
*Let be a group and let .
a) (Palfy’s condition) [12] If is solvable and , then there exist two distinct primes in and such that .
b) (Moreto-Tiep’s condition) [11] If , then there exists such that is divisible by two distinct primes in .*
Lemma 2.5**.**
[14*]** Let , where is a power of a prime .
a) If is even, then has three connected components, , and , and each component is a complete graph.
b) If is odd, then has two connected components, and .
i) The connected component is a complete graph if and only if or is a power of .
ii) If neither of or is a power of , then can be partitioned as , where and are both non-empty sets. The subgraph of corresponding to each of the subsets , is complete, all primes are adjacent to , and no prime in is adjacent to any prime in .*
Lemma 2.6**.**
[2]** Let be a finite group, and let be a subset of the vertex set of such that is an odd number larger than 1. Then is the set of vertices of a cycle in if and only if , where is abelian, or for a prime and a positive integer , and the primes in are alternately odd divisors of and .
Lemma 2.7**.**
[5]** If and are two non-abelian groups that satisfy with , then , where is a complete graph with vertex set .
3 Proof of main results
In this section, we wish to prove our main results.
Proof of Theorem A. On the contrary, we assume that is not perfect. Then by Lemma 2.3, there exists a subset such that for some integer , and or is a cycle. Now one of the following cases occurs:
Case 1. is a cycle. Then there exist primes such that is the cycle . Using Lemma 2.6, , where is abelian, or for a prime and a positive integer , and the primes in are alternately odd divisors of and . Without loss of generality, we can assume that . Since is a cycle of length at least , is not adjacent to both vertices and in . Also for some , and . Note that is an element of either or . Without loss of generality, we can assume that . since and are adjacent vertices in , for some , . Now let be a constituent of . Then by Lemma 2.1, divides . Therefore as is a -group, . It is a contradiction as using Lemma 2.5, and are non-adjacent vertices in .
Case 2. is a cycle. If , then which is a contradiction with Case 1. Thus . Hence there exist distinct primes such that the induced subgraphs of on the sets and are cycles of length . Hence by Lemma 2.6, for every , , where is abelian, or for a prime and a positive integer , and the primes in are alternately odd divisors of and . Let . It is easy to see that . Therefore by Lemmas 2.5 and 2.7, is a complete bipartite graph with parts and which is a contradiction as is a cycle of .∎
Proof of Corollary B. Using Theorem A, is a perfect graph. Thus by Lemma 2.2, is too. Hence . It is clear that . By Lemma 2.4, . Hence and the proof is completed.∎
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by a grant from School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Z. Akhlaghi, C. Casolo, S. Dolfi, K. Khedri, E. pacifici, On the character degree graph of solvable groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146 (2018), 1505-1513.
- 2[2] Z. Akhlaghi, C. Casolo, S. Dolfi, E. pacifici, L. Sanus, On the character degree graph of finite groups, Annali di Mat. Pura Appl., (2019) 1923-1942.
- 3[3] J.A. Bondy, U.S.R. Murty, Graph Theory , Graduate texts in mathematics, 244, Springer, New York, 2008.
- 4[4] M. Chudnovsky, N. Robertson, P. Seymour, R. Thomas, The strong perfect graph theorem, Ann. of Math., (2), 164(1)(2006) 51-229.
- 5[5] S. Hosseinzadeh, A. Iranmanesh, M.A. Hosseinzadeh, M.L. Lewis, On graphs associated with character degrees and conjugacy class sizes of direct product of finite groups, Canad. Math. Bull., 58 (2015) 105-109.
- 6[6] I.M. Isaacs, Character Theory of Finite Groups, Academic Press. San Diego, 1976.
- 7[7] M.L. Lewis, An overview of graphs associated with character degrees and conjugacy class sizes in finite group, Rocky Mountain, J. Math., 38 (1) (2008) 175-211.
- 8[8] L. Lovasz. A characterization of perfect graphs. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B, 13 (1972) 95-98.
