Tau functions, Hodge classes and discriminant loci on moduli spaces of Hitchin's spectral covers
Dmitry Korotkin, Peter Zograf

TL;DR
The paper introduces two tau functions on moduli spaces of spectral covers in Hitchin systems, linking them to divisor classes and zeros of canonical forms, advancing the understanding of geometric structures in integrable systems.
Contribution
It defines new tau functions on Hitchin spectral cover moduli spaces and relates them to divisor classes and zeros of canonical forms, providing tools for geometric analysis.
Findings
Expressed the divisor class of the Hitchin discriminant using tau functions.
Computed the divisor of canonical 1-forms with multiple zeros.
Linked tau functions to standard generators of the Picard group.
Abstract
We define two tau functions, and , on moduli spaces of spectral covers of Hitchin's systems. Analyzing the properties of , we express the divisor class of the universal Hitchin's discriminant in terms of standard generators of the rational Picard group of the moduli spaces of spectral covers with variable base. The function is used to compute the divisor of canonical 1-forms with multiple zeros.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Dedicated to the memory of L.D.Faddeev
Tau functions, Hodge classes and discriminant loci on moduli spaces of Hitchin’s spectral covers
Dmitry Korotkin
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve W., Montreal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8
and
Peter Zograf
Steklov Mathematical Institute, Fontanka 27, Saint Petersburg 191023 Russia; Chebyshev Laboratory, Saint Petersburg State University, 14-th Line V.O. 29, Saint Petersburg 199178 Russia
Abstract. We define two tau functions, and , on moduli spaces of spectral covers of Hitchin’s systems. Analyzing the properties of , we express the divisor class of the universal Hitchin’s discriminant in terms of standard generators of the rational Picard group of the moduli spaces of spectral covers with variable base. The function is used to compute the divisor of canonical 1-forms with multiple zeros.
Contents
1. Introduction
Yang-Mills equations have a deep connection to the theory of integrable systems: most of soliton equations are dimensional reductions of the self-dual Yang-Mills equation (SDYM). In the pioneering work [17, 18], N. Hitchin proposed a dimensional reduction of SDYM by splitting 4-dimensional space into the product of a Riemann surface and the real plane , where the gauge fields are assumed to be independent of coordinates on . As a result of such dimensional reduction, one arrives at the class of finite-dimensional completely integrable systems, called Hitchin’s systems; we refer to Atiyah’s book [2] (Sect. 6.3) for an introduction to the topic and to the original papers [17, 18] and reviews [10, 11] for more detailed description of the subject. Hitchin’s systems, as well as their generalizations to the meromorphic case [20], provide the most general class of integrable systems associated to Riemann surfaces of an arbitrary genus.
Let be a Riemann surface (smooth complex curve) of genus . The Hamiltonians of Hitchin’s system are encoded in the so-called spectral cover which is an -sheeted cover of defined by the equation in
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is a holomorphic -differential on , and is considered as a holomorphic 1-form on . In the framework of [17] the equation (1.1) is given by the characteristic polynomial of the so-calles Higgs field on .
For the most general case of Hitchin’s systems all differentials from (1.1) are arbitrary; in the case of systems . In this paper we mainly consider the generic case of systems although most of the formulas are applicable to the case without modification.
The branch points of the cover are the zeros of the discriminant of that coincides with the resultant of and up to a sign:
[TABLE]
It is easy to verify that the discriminant is a holomorphic -differential on . Thus, the number of zeros of , counted with multiplicities, equals
[TABLE]
and the Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives the genus of :
[TABLE]
so that . When all zeros of are simple, all branch points of the cover are also simple. In the simplest case of (1.1) ; in particular, for we have and the equation (1.1) takes the form
[TABLE]
where is a holomorphic quadratic differential. The cover defined by (1.5) is sometimes called a “canonical cover” [1, 12]. The genus of (1.5) equals (assuming that all zeros of are simple) and the dimension of the moduli space of curves (1.5) equals when the base curve is also allowed to vary. Since the space of covers (1.5) forms an open subspace in the cotangent bundle of the moduli space of curves of genus , it possesses a canonical symplectic structure. This symplectic structure, including a natural system of period, or homological, Darboux coordinates was studied in detail in the recent paper [3].
An immediate generalization of (1.5) is given by the family of -invariant covers
[TABLE]
where is a holomorphic -differential and . The genus of the covering (1.6) is also given by (1.4), but this case is far from being generic since all ramification points of (1.6) are of order . The moduli space of -covers (1.6) was studied in [29], see also [4].
The goal of this paper is to extend some of the results about the moduli spaces of -covers to the moduli spaces of Hitchin’s generic covers (1.1).
In particular, we generalize the theory of tau functions (which can be considered as a higher genus generalizations of Dedekind’s eta function) to the moduli spaces of Hitchin’s covers. For moduli of -curves this was done in [28] (for ) and in [29] (for ), using the approach developed earlier in [25, 26, 27].
In particular, the Bergman tau functions (called so due to their close ties to the Bergman projective connection) allowed to find new relations in the Picard groups of these moduli spaces.
We also notice that the tau functions we discuss here can be interpreted as determinants of appropriate -operators in the spirit of [37]; they also have close relations to conformal field theory [31], isomonodromic deformations [21, 35, 22, 33] and Frobenius manifolds [13, 14, 23, 24].
Spaces of coverings with fixed base. Let be a smooth curve of genus and denote by the moduli space of spectral covers of the form (1.1). Then
[TABLE]
where is the canonical line bundle on , and
[TABLE]
(recall that and for ).
There is a natural coordinate system on given by the -periods of :
[TABLE]
where is a canonical symplectic basis in .
We consider the following two codimension 1 loci in – the locus of sets of differentials such that the discriminant of has multiple zeroes, and the locus of sets such that the Abelian differential on has multiple zeroes. The locus is called the Hitchin’s discriminant locus, whereas we call the locus of degenerate spectral covers. For a generic point in , that is a point in the complement , all zeros of the discriminant and all zeros of the Abelian differential on are simple.
Consider also the space of spectral covers with simple branch points and the space of covers with simple zeros of .
Spaces of covers with variable base. Let be the Deligne-Mumford compactification of the moduli space of curves , let be the universal curve, and let be the relative dualizing sheaf. Put
[TABLE]
where is the direct image of the th power of . We have
[TABLE]
There is also a natural forgetful map such that the fiber over coincides with (the fibers over nodal curves are described in detail in [29]). Denote by and respectively the unions of loci and as varies over the entire moduli space .
There is a natural action of on that fiberwise looks like and respects the codimension one loci and . After projectivization both and become divisors in . There is a natural forgetful map
[TABLE]
The main goal of this paper is to express the class of divisor in terms of the standard generators of the rational Picard group . We also express the class via the natural divisorial classes on .
1.1. Components of the universal discriminant locus
Assume that two simple zeros and of coalesce to a double zero on . To describe possible deformations of the cover , choose a system of generators of satisfying the standard relation
[TABLE]
The covering defines the group homomorphism , the permutation group of elements. Let and . When all zeros of (i.e. branch points of the covering ) are simple, both and are simple permutations. As , the covering degenerates to a covering whose structure depends on the type of the product .
Consider a neighborhood of containing both and , and introduce a local coordinate in . Let and . There are three patterns of local behavior of and that correspond to three different components of . We will use the terminology of [34]:
1. The “boundary” .
In this case is a trivial permutation. In the limit the spectral cover acquires a node (double point) while approaching the (Deligne-Mumford) boundary of . Since the order of points and is irrelevant, a transversal local coordinate on near can be chosen as
[TABLE]
2. The “Maxwell stratum” .
In this case is a product of two cycles of length 2, i.e. the ramification points of remain simple, but two of them correspond to the same critical value . Then, since a point in the Maxwell stratum splits into two simple critical values in two ways, a transversal local coordinate on near can be chosen as
[TABLE]
3. The “caustic” .
In this case is a cycle of length 3, i.e. as the cover acquires a ramification point of order 3. It can be decomposed into a product of two transpositions in 3 different ways, a transversal local coordinate on near can be chosen as
[TABLE]
The transversal local coordinates , and can be specified further as follows. Let us choose the coordinate in such a way that the discriminant is given by
[TABLE]
Put ; then, up to a multiplicative constant,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
As one can see from the above considerations, the universal Hitchin’s discriminant locus splits into 3 components:
[TABLE]
This splitting respects the action of on and descends to the projectivizations of these divisors.
2. Tau functions on spaces of Abelian and higher order differentials
Here we summarize previously known results from [25, 27, 28, 29].
2.1. Preliminaries
For a Torelli marked Riemann surface of genus introduce the canonical bidifferential , which has the quadratic pole with biresidue 1 on the diagonal and vanishing -periods. The bidifferential is expressed via the the prime-form as follows: (see [15, 36] for details). Consider a basis of holomorphic differentials on normalized by The period matrix of is given by:
In a local coordinate near the diagonal , the bidifferential has the expansion
[TABLE]
where is a projective connection on called the Bergman projective connection.
If two canonical bases of cycles on , and are related by a matrix
[TABLE]
then the corresponding canonical bidifferentials are related as follows (p. 21 of [15]):
[TABLE]
The Abel map is defined by . Let us also define
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is the Wronskian determinant of the basic holomorphic differentials, is the theta function and is the vector of Riemann constants with base point . The expression (2.4) is a multi-valued -differential on which does not have any zeros or poles [16]. In the case of genus the -dependence in (2.4) drops out and turns into .
2.2. Spaces of holomorphic Abelian differentials
Denote by the moduli space of pairs where is a Riemann surface of genus and is a holomorphic differential on ; clearly . The space can be stratified according to multiplicities of zeros of : for any partition of denote by the moduli space of pairs such that multiplicities of zeros of are given by . Then and a system of period, or homological, coordinates on can be obtained by integrating over a system of generators in the relative homology group , see [32] for details. A natural choice of generators in this homology group is
[TABLE]
where is a canonical basis of cycles on and is a path connecting the with .
Periods of along the cycles (2.6) give a system of local coordinates on the stratum :
[TABLE]
The dual basis of cycles in is defined by
[TABLE]
where is a small positively oriented circle around , so that (the symbol denotes here the intersection pairing of 1-cycles).
The differential gives rise to a natural coordinate on . Pick a fundamental polygon of and put
[TABLE]
The (multivalued) coordinate is defined on everywhere except the zeros ; near the local coordinate, called distinguished, is given by
[TABLE]
Tau functions on strata of moduli spaces of holomorphic abelian differentials were introduced in [25], by generalizing the notion of isomonodromic Jimbo-Miwa tau function for Riemann-Hilbert problems [33, 24]. The tau function is defined on the stratum by the system
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Introduce two vectors and such that
[TABLE]
Put
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is the distinguished local parameter (2.10) on near . Then the solution of the system (2.11) looks as follows (see [25] for the proof):
[TABLE]
Under the change of Torelli marking of given by symplectic matrix (2.2) transforms as follows:
[TABLE]
where is a root of unity of degree depending on the multiplicities .
Another important property of the tau function is its behavior under the action of :
[TABLE]
The tau function can be used for obtaining relations between divisors in the rational Picard group of the strata on the moduli space of Abelian differentials.
For the main stratum these relations were found in [27]. Namely, let be the projectivization of respect to the action of . Let be the tautological line bundle associated to the projection , and denote by its first Chern class. Furthermore, denote by the pullback to of the Hodge class on . Then we have the following relation in the rational Picard group of the compactification of :
[TABLE]
Here is the divisor of Abelian differentials with multiple zeroes, and are the pullbacks of the classes of the Deligne-Mumford boundary divisors on ; see [27] for details. 111This relation has later received pure algebraic proofs by D. Zvonkine (unpublished) and by D.Chen [9]
2.3. Spaces of holomorphic -differentials
The above result was extended further to the spaces of -differentials in [28] (for ) and [29] (for ).
Let be the moduli space of equivalence classes of pairs where is a holomorphic -differential on (both and are allowed to vary here). We refer to [29, 4] for a precise definition of the space and its compactification .
The dimension of is the sum of and , i.e.
[TABLE]
The space has an open subset , that consists of equivalence classes of pairs , where is a smooth curve, and has only simple zeroes.The complement is the union of divisors that we denote by , where is the divisor of degenerate -differentials (i.e. having multiple zeroes), and are the pullbacks of the components of the Deligne-Mumford boundary of .
A natural -action on is given by multiplication . Denote by the tautological line bundle associated with the canonical projection and put .
Denote by the Hodge class on (i.e. the pullback of the Hodge class from the moduli space of curves ), and consider the classes of boundary divisors in . Then the rational Picard group is freely generated by the classes [29].
To each pair one can naturally associate a canonical cyclic branched cover of degree , where
[TABLE]
When all zeros of are simple, the cover is smooth and its genus is . The cover is invariant with respect to the natural -action where . Denote by the automorphism of corresponding to . By definition, the holomorphic 1-form satisfies .
The group can be decomposed into the eigenspaces of the automorphism
[TABLE]
where and the dimensions of are independent of and given by
[TABLE]
The differential has non-vanishing periods only over the cycles in ; these periods can be used as local coordinates on the moduli space [29, 4]:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is a basis of of the eigenspace .
For any two cycles and we have unless . The spaces and are therefore dual to each other with respect to the standard intersection pairing (the space can be identified with , and, therefore, it is dual to itself).
Therefore, one can introduce a set of cycles dual to (2.25) which form a basis in the space :
[TABLE]
Now assume that all zeros of are simple, i.e.
[TABLE]
Then the distinguished local coordinate on in a neighbourhood of the point is given by
[TABLE]
In terms of these coordinates we define
[TABLE]
We choose two vectors that satisfy the condition
[TABLE]
The tau function on the space is defined by
[TABLE]
see [29] for details.
The tau function (2.30) satisfies the following system of equations with respect to the periods of (2.24):
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The tau function (2.30) has properties similar to those of (2.16):
- •
Under the change (2.2) of a Torelli marking of the tau function (2.30) transforms as follows:
[TABLE]
where is a root of unity of order .
- •
is quasi-homogeneous with respect to the action of :
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
These properties, together with the asymptotics of near and the components of the Deligne-Mumford boundary, imply the following expression for the Hodge class on the space (Theorem 3.9 of [29]):
[TABLE]
3. The divisor class of the universal Hitchin’s discriminant
Consider the following vector bundles on the moduli spaces of curves and their pullbacks to :
- •
The Hodge vector bundle . The fiber of over a smooth curve is the -dimensional vector space of holomorphic 1-forms (Abelian differentials) on . This bundle naturally lifts to , and we put .
- •
The Hodge vector bundle .The fiber of over a smooth spectral cover is the -dimensional vector space of holomorphic 1-forms on . This bundle also lifts to , and, similarly, we put .
- •
The tautological line bundle . The line bundle is associated with the natural action of on by
[TABLE]
Denote by the projectivization of with respect to the action (3.1). The fibers of the projection are weighted projective spaces , where , see (1.7). The bundle extends to the compctification , and we put .
Remark 3.1**.**
Rigorously speaking, all these objects should be understood in a proper sense (that is, as sheaves on smooth algebraic stacks). However, abusing the language, we will continue calling them vector bundles.**
If the base curve has nodes, the differentials may have poles up to order at each node. If has poles of the maximal order at the two intersecting branches of with equal or opposite -residues depending on the parity of ; see Section 1.1 of [29] or [4] for details. Therefore, the discriminant can have poles of order up to at the nodes (in case of poles of order the residues must be equal, since is always even).
For a point consider the cyclic -cover of given by (2.21) with , and consider the decomposition (2.22) of the homology group . Choose a set of linearly independent cycles
[TABLE]
in the subspace . As in (2.26), consider the cycles dual to (2.25)
[TABLE]
(they form a basis in the space . Generally speaking, the periods of with respect to the basis (3.2) do not provide a coordinate system on since is smaller than for .
The tau function on the space can be defined by the system of equations
[TABLE]
The solution of (3.4) is given by the formula (2.30), where and , are the zeroes of .
Since under the rescaling , the discriminant transforms as , the tautological line bundles and associated with the -actions on and respectively are related by , and .
Furthermore, according to formulas (3.13), (3.15) of [29], the tau function has the following asymptotics when two zeros of (say, and ) coalesce:
[TABLE]
Using the transformation properties (2.33) and (2.34) of and computing its divisor, we obtain the following relation in
[TABLE]
where is the pullback of the Deligne-Mumford boundary class relative to the projection . Expressing the class of in terms of , and the boundary class we get
Theorem 3.2**.**
The class of the (projectivized) universal Hitchin’s discriminant defined by (1.19) expresses in terms of the standard generators of as follows:
[TABLE]
4. Divisor and the Hodge class
There is a natural map to the moduli space of holomorphic 1-forms that sends the point to the point . Generically, all zeros of the differential are simple, and there are of them that we denote . The number of periods of over the cycles (2.6) in the relative homology group is equal to which is in general greater than .
Consider the set of generators of the relative homology group :
[TABLE]
where is a simple path connecting with .
The dual system of generators in the homology group is
[TABLE]
where is a small positively oriented circle around such that )
The class of the divisor of zeros of the differential can be expressed in terms of the Hodge class and the classes and using the tau function (2.16) on the moduli spaces of holomorphic Abelian differentials with simple zeros on the complex curves of genus . The tau function on the space of spectral covers (1.1) is defined by the explicit formula (2.16).
Formula (2.17) implies that transforms like follows under the change of Torelli marking of given by \left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\hat{C}&\hat{D}\\ \hat{B}&\hat{A}\end{array}\right)\in Sp(2\hat{g},{\mathbb{Z}}):
[TABLE]
where . By (2.18), under the rescaling behaves like
[TABLE]
Notice that when the curve approaches the boundary of , the cover approaches a codimension locus in the component of the Deligne-Mumford boundary of . Then the formulas (4.3) and (4.4) combined with the asymptotics of near in (cf. Lemma 7 of [27]), imply the following
Theorem 4.1**.**
The class of the (projectivized) divisor of non-generic (i.e., for with multiple zeroes) spectral covers in is given by
[TABLE]
Here is the Hodge class of pulled back to , is the tautological class associated with the projection , and is the pullback to of the Deligne-Mumford boundary of .
The proof of the theorem follows almost verbatim the proof of Theorem 2 in [29]
5. Prym class in
Let be a generic point of the projection , i.e. . Denote by a local coordinate on in a small neighborhood of . Then can be used as a local coordinate on each of the connected components of the preimage of .
A holomorphic Abelian differential on is called a Prym differential if
[TABLE]
for any that is not a branch point of ). Then there is the following decomposition of the space of holomorphic differentials on :
[TABLE]
If the cover (1.1) arises from an Hitchin’s system (i.e. if ), then the sum of solutions of the equation (1.1) is zero. In this case is a Prym differential.
The vector bundle on with fiber over is called the Prym vector bundle. The Prym bundle naturally extends to and descends to the projectivization . The first Chern class of the determinant of the Prym vector bundle is called the Prym class and is denoted by .
We define the Prym tau function as
[TABLE]
It may be viewed as a section of a holomorphic line bundle on . Computing its divisor and using Theorems 3.2 and 4.1 we get
Corollary 5.1**.**
The Prym class decomposes in into a linear combination of the classes , , the tautological class and the boundary class as follows:
[TABLE]
6. spectral covers
The equation (1.1) of the spectral cover in the case looks like follows:
[TABLE]
The discriminant is then , and the differential on is
[TABLE]
where the choice of is compatible with the involution . Generically, the differential has simple zeros at the branch points (since both and , being lifted to , have simple zeros at the branch points), and more simple poles elsewhere.
If all zeros of are simple, then the genus of equals to . The formula (3.6) for the class of the divisor (which in this case coincides with ) takes the form
[TABLE]
and for the divisor by (4.5) we have
[TABLE]
7. Open questions
The following questions arise naturally in connection with the subject of this work.
Using (4.5) one can express the class in terms of the class and the class of the divisor of zeros of the product of even theta constants (the “theta-null”) on . This relation follows from (4.5) and the expression of in terms of given in Proposition 3.1 of [38]. Similarly, by Formula (3.7) and Proposition 3.1 of [38] one can express the class of divisor in terms of the class of the theta-null on , the tautological class and the boundary class . What kind of relation one can get between the divisor classes of “theta-nulls” of the cover and of the base?
The holomorphic -differentials which appear as discriminants of Hitchin’s covers are rather special: for a fixed the space of discriminants has dimension , while the space of all holomorphic -differentials has dimension . How to distinguish differentials that are discriminants among all holomorphic -differentials?
- What is the connection, if any, between the divisors appearing in this work and the “critical loci” discussed in the recent paper of N.Hitchin [19]?
Remark 7.1**.**
This paper was originally published in the volume [30] dedicated to the memory of L. D .Faddeev. More recently the paper [6] by M. Basok appeared containing more detailed information about various divisor classes discussed in this paper. More precisely, for and the following formulas were obtained in [6] for the classes of the “caustic”, the “Maxwell stratum” and the boundary components of the universal Hitchin’s discriminant (1.19):
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The expression for the class of the universal Hitchin’ discriminant obtained by means of these formulas coincides with our formula (3.7).
Another formula derived in [6] relates the classes and :
[TABLE]
In particular, this formula yields a relation between the classes and given by the formulas (3.7) and (4.5).
Acknowledgements. The authors thank Mikhail Basok for discussions. D. K. thanks Marco Bertola, Jacques Hurtubise and Chaya Norton for useful comments. We thank Michael Baker for spotting several misprints in the first version of this paper. The work of D.K. was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant RGPIN/3827-2015 and by the FQRNT grant ”Matrices Aléatoires, Processus Stochastiques et Systèmes Intégrables” (2013–PR–166790). The research of Section 3 was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant 14-21-00035.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Abikoff, W., The real analytic theory of Teichmüller space . Lecture Notes in Math., 820 Springer, Berlin, 144 p. (1980)
- 2[2] Atiyah, M., The geometry and physics of knots , Lezioni Lincee, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 78 pp. (1990)
- 3[3] Bertola, M., Korotkin, D., Norton, C., Symplectic geometry of the moduli space of projective structures in homological coordinates , Invent. Math. 210 , 859-914 (2017)
- 4[4] Bainbridge, M., Chen, D., Gendron, Q., Grushevsky, S., Moeller, M., Strata of k 𝑘 k -differentials , ar Xiv:1610.09238, J. Alg. Geometry (to appear)
- 5[5] Balducci,D., Donagi-Markman cubic for Hitchin systems , Math. Res. Lett., 13 923-933 (2006)
- 6[6] Basok, M., Discriminant and Hodge classes on the space of Hitchin’s covers , ar Xiv:1904.00489
- 7[7] Bertola, M., Korotkin, D., Hodge and Prym tau functions, Jenkins-Strebel differentials and combinatorial model of ℳ g , n subscript ℳ 𝑔 𝑛 \mathcal{M}_{g,n} ar Xiv:1804.02495
- 8[8] Bruzzo, U., Dalakov, P., Donagi-Markman cubic for the generalized Hitchin system , Internat. J. Math. 25 , no. 2, 1450016, 20 pp. (2014)
