Air tightness of hBN encapsulation and its impact on Raman spectroscopy of van der Waals materials

TL;DR

This study demonstrates that hBN encapsulation effectively prevents oxidation of van der Waals materials during Raman spectroscopy, highlighting the importance of proper encapsulation for non-invasive characterization.

Contribution

It provides new insights into how hBN encapsulation impacts the preservation of van der Waals materials during Raman analysis, emphasizing the need for full encapsulation.

Findings

Oxidation occurs in ambient conditions during Raman spectroscopy.

Full hBN encapsulation prevents oxidation of NbSe2.

Partial encapsulation is insufficient to block oxygen diffusion.

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is a precious tool for the characterization of van der Waals materials, e.g. for the determination of the layer number in thin exfoliated flakes. For sensitive materials, however, this method can be dramatically invasive. In particular, the light intensity required to obtain a significant Raman signal is sufficient to immediately photo-oxidize few-layer thick metallic van der Waals materials. In this work we investigated the impact of the environment on Raman characterization of thin NbSe$_2$ crystals. We show that in ambient conditions the flake is locally oxidized even for very low illumination intensity. On the other hand, we observe no degradation if the Raman measurements are performed either in vacuum or on fully hBN-encapsulated samples. Interestingly, we find that covering samples deposited on the usual SiO$_2$ surface only from the top is not sufficient to prevent diffusion of oxygen underneath the layers.

Equations

$${\omega }_S(N)={\omega }_0\cos (\pi /2N).$$

$$\omega (n,N)={\omega }_0\cos (n\pi /2N),$$

Full text

Raman spectroscopy, sensitive 2D materials, photo-oxidation, hBN encapsulation

2D materials are by definition all-surface crystals, where the environment plays a crucial role compared to bulk systems Novoselov et al. (2016). Interaction with the substrate (typically a polished SiO2 wafer) and absorption of ambient contaminants unavoidably introduce a considerable amount of disorder Geim and Grigorieva (2013); Li et al. (2019). Further contamination is produced by standard exfoliation techniques based on viscoelastic polymers and by nano-lithographic patterning Castellanos-Gomez et al. (2014). The impact of the environment is particularly critical for materials that tend to oxidize Li et al. (2019); Wood et al. (2014); Ye et al. (2016); Sun et al. (2017). In this case, a brief exposure to air might lead to the complete disappearance of the material under study, which is rapidly substituted by its oxide species.

In most cases, oxidation in van der Waals materials is highly stimulated by light Favron et al. (2015). This makes their optical characterization, e.g. by Raman spectroscopy, where relatively high illumination intensities and/or integration times are required, rather difficult. On the other hand, Raman spectroscopy is a fundamental tool for the study of few-layer van der Waals materials. It provides a handy, precise and usually nondestructive means of mapping individual crystals. A plethora of important information, such as the number of layers Ferrari et al. (2006); Lee et al. (2010), doping Yan et al. (2007); Heydrich et al. (2010); Chakraborty et al. (2012) or applied strain Huang et al. (2010); Rice et al. (2013) can be extracted from Raman spectra for many different two-dimensional materials. While most Raman-active modes are specific to the crystal structure of a certain material, the rigid-layer shear and compression modes are generic to the layered van der Waals materials Tan et al. (2012); Plechinger et al. (2012); Zhang et al. (2012); Nagler et al. (2016). Due to the weak interlayer coupling in these materials, however, they have low Raman shifts and are more challenging to observe than higher-frequency modes.

In the present work we investigate the role of the environment in Raman spectroscopy of few-layer NbSe2 crystals, an exemplary van der Waals material that is well known for its reactivity in air El-Bana et al. (2013); Sun et al. (2017); Cao et al. (2015). We show that in ambient conditions NbSe2 quickly oxidizes already under very low illumination intensity. The main goal of our work is to demonstrate convenient methods for preventing oxidation. We show that an encapsulation in hBN from both the bottom and the top side (here indicated as full encapsulation) is totally air-tight and very effective in preventing photo-oxidation on a long term. Instead, the commonly used half encapsulation method (where NbSe2 is covered by hBN only from the top side while adhering on the SiO2 substrate) is not sufficient to protect the sensitive crystal, since it allows for a slow diffusion of oxygen underneath the layers.

Few-layer NbSe2 crystals are exfoliated in a glove-box filled with nitrogen gas. Except for the glove-box, our stamping setup is nearly identical to that described in Ref. Castellanos-Gomez et al. (2014). We use two methods for stamping 2D materials. The former method (hereafter indicated as simple stamping) is the same as the one described in Ref. Castellanos-Gomez et al. (2014): 2D crystals are exfoliated with an adhesive tape and transferred onto a thin polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film which adheres on a glass slide. Suitable flakes are found by inspection in an optical microscope and transferred onto a substrate using a micromanipulator placed under a zoom-lens. Our standard substrates consist of degenerately doped Si wafers capped with 285 nm-thick thermal SiO2. The latter stamping method (hereafter indicated as pick-up) is similar to that described in Ref. Wang et al. (2013); Zomer et al. (2014): 2D crystals are first placed on temporary substrates (e.g. by simple stamping) and then picked-up at 120 *∘*C by a thick, round PDMS film covered by polycarbonate (PC). Several different crystals can be sequentially picked up. Finally, the stack is stamped at 180 *∘*C onto the final substrate. At this temperature PC is dissolved and is released together with the stack onto the substrate surface. The PC residuals are finally dissolved in chloroform.

Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed in a self-built optical setup, experimental details are published elsewhere Plechinger et al. (2015); Nagler et al. (2016). Briefly, we utilize a continuous-wave laser source with wavelength 532 nm filtered with a narrow bandpass. This is coupled into a 100$\times$, NA 0.8 microscope objective, resulting in a spot size of about 1 $\mu$m. The sample, mounted inside a small He-flow cryostat serving as a vacuum chamber, is positioned under the fixed optical beam path with a motorized xy-stage. The backscattered Raman light is collected using the same objective, dispersed using a grating spectrometer equipped with a 1800 grooves per mm holographic grating and detected with a Peltier-cooled CCD camera. To ensure a wavenumber accuracy of 0.5 cm*-1*, the instrument was periodically calibrated using the 520.5 cm*-1* band of the underlying Si substrate as a reference. While the higher-energy Raman modes of NbSe2 could be measured using a single long-pass-filter and parallel polarization geometry, we had to utilize a set of 3 Bragg filters in order to access the low-frequency shear modes. Additionally, crossed-polarization geometry was used to further suppress the elastically backscattered laser.

In our first reference experiment we investigated few-layer NbSe2 crystals transferred by simple exfoliation on a standard Si/SiO2 substrate one day before the measurement. The results of micro-Raman measurements in ambient conditions show a dramatic oxidation within a few seconds even under an illumination power of only 8 $\mu$W. Figure 1(a) shows an optical picture of sample $\mathsf{A}$, an exemplary bilayer NbSe2 flake partially covered by a hBN crystal. This sample has been obtained by the simple stamping procedure described above. Panel (b) shows the same sample after three brief (10 s integration each) attempts to measure the Raman spectrum in different positions, here labelled as A, B and C. The illumination power in this case is 8 $\mu$W, which is much less than the threshold for obtaining a discernible signal in reasonable integration times. After illumination, the spot positions appear as holes, i.e. regions that look more transparent than the surroundings. These are clear signs of photo-induced oxidation. Remarkably, the hBN protection does not help to limit the oxidation process: the spot C, which is covered by hBN, looks similar to those in A and B. This is one of the most surprising results of our work. Figure 1(c) shows a topography map obtained by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on the same sample after the Raman measurement attempts. We notice that the oxidized regions are not visible on the unprotected part. This indicates that the oxidation does not significantly alter the thickness of the crystal (within the limit of vertical resolution of the AFM scan, which is about 0.5 nm). Interestingly, on the hBN-covered part, the oxidation spot appears instead as a bulge in the topography.

The most straightforward way to circumvent the oxidation problem is to perform the Raman measurements in high vacuum. This is the method used in the literature of Raman experiments on few-layer NbSe2 crystals Xi et al. (2015); He et al. (2016). We performed measurements on crystals obtained again by simple exfoliation on a standard Si/SiO2 substrate one day before the measurement. This time, we loaded the samples in the vacuum chamber, which was pumped down to few 10*-5* mbar. The measurements are carried out at room temperature. In such conditions, no oxidation is observed even for long exposures (of at least several tens of minutes) to 5 mW of illumination power, nearly three orders of magnitude more than the power used in the tests in air. The absence of oxidation allows us to use a suitable integration time so that we can also observe weak Raman features such as the interlayer $E^{2}_{2g}$ shear mode Wang and Chen (1974); Pereira and Liang (1982). Our goal is to obtain a layer number mapping of the sample, in order to associate a well defined layer number to a given optical contrast. To this end, we chose a flake with several terraces, each with a different color and contrast. Part of the flake is again covered by hBN. Figure 2(b) shows low-frequency Raman spectra measured on five distinct positions on sample $\mathsf{B}$ plus one spectrum measured on a monolayer portion located on another sample (sample $\mathsf{C}$). Figure 2(c) shows a plot of the Raman shift versus number of layers, together with a fit with the function

[TABLE]

This expression is the result of a very simple model which assumes the layers to be identical objects of mass $m$, each connected by the same spring constant to the nearest neighbors. The eigenmodes of this classical mechanics problem Thornton and Marion (2003) are

[TABLE]

where $n$ is the mode index. For the shear mode $E^{2}_{2g}$, the oscillation measured in Raman spectra corresponds to the highest frequency mode (i.e., $n=1$) Lui et al. (2014); He et al. (2016), which leads to the expression in Eq.1.

Despite the simplicity of the classical model, its agreement with the experiment is remarkable. From the one-parameter fit we obtain the constant $\omega_{0}=28.25\pm 0.10$ cm*-1*. This value agrees well with the results of other measurements reported in the literature He et al. (2016); Xi et al. (2015). We stress that, by definition, monolayers do not support interlayer modes, as observed in the measurement (black curve in Fig. 2(b)).

From the measurements on sample $\mathsf{B}$ we also deduce that hBN encapsulation does not significantly affect the shear mode frequency. In fact, the shear mode Raman shifts measured on position D and E (trilayer and bilayer, respectively, see Fig. 2(a)) are located on the same curve as the other points measured on position A, B, and C, see Fig. 2(c). As discussed in the Supplementary Information, we have performed several control measurements with partially hBN-protected NbSe2 flakes. The difference between the Raman shift on bare and protected NbSe2 portions are always below the experimental uncertainty. This indicates that the differences in interlayer interaction and in layer density mechanically decouples the TMDC from the hBN.

So far, we have shown that performing the experiment in vacuum is the simplest way to perform a Raman measurement on sensitive van der Waals materials. However, this might be not always possible. The main goal of our work is to seek a method to reliably protect a van der Waals flake from oxidation in situations where it is not possible to operate in vacuum. The method we found is the same used to obtain high-mobility graphene devices, namely, a full encapsulation in hBN Wang et al. (2013). In graphene devices, the main role of the bottom layer is to keep the flake spatially separated from the SiO2 substrate surface, whose roughness and charge traps are highly detrimental for the mobility of the electron gas. In the present work, instead, the role of the bottom layer is to tightly seal the flake in between, due to the strong interaction between two adjacent hBN layers in the region outside, see sketch in Fig. 3(b).

From a practical point of view, one could obtain a fully encapsulated NbSe2 crystal using the simple stamping method described above. We empirically found, however, that this method does not work for NbSe2. This latter does not reliably stick on hBN when transferred at room temperature using PDMS only. Fortunately, the pick-up method is instead much more reliable, probably owing to the squeezing of the inter-flake bubbles at the higher temperature required for the pick-up stamping Wang et al. (2013); Zomer et al. (2014).

Figure 3(a) shows an optical picture of a NbSe2 flake fully encapsulated in hBN, fabricated with the pick-up method. The key advantage of this configuration is that on the areas surrounding the NbSe2 the top hBN flake adheres on another hBN flake. It is known from the high mobility graphene technology that such layers are in tight (on the atomic scale) contact and therefore the stack is expected to be air-tight. We started our measurement session in vacuum. We then measured the Raman spectrum in the region around the $A_{1g}$ and $E^{1}_{2g}$ intralayer Raman modes Wang and Chen (1974); Pereira and Liang (1982). This Raman spectrum, measured with an illumination power of 2.6 mW and an integration time of 300 s, is shown in Fig. 3(c), black line. We then vented the system in air. We refocused the laser spot and immediately repeated the same measurement three times. We notice that, apart from a barely discernible decrease between the measurement in vacuum and the first measurement in air (which we attribute to a not perfect refocusing after the venting of the chamber), there is no significant change in the peak amplitude. This indicates that there is no appreciable degradation of the crystal induced by the light beam. To test the tightness of the stack over longer time scales, we left the system exposed to air for two days and then repeated the measurements (with illumination power 2.5 mW), which are shown in Fig. 3(d). Again, no degradation of the Raman signal was observed.

Let us sum up the results of our observations so far: optical measurements on few-layer NbSe2 lead to a quick photo-induced oxidation within seconds even under an illumination of few $\mu$W/$\mu$m2. In vacuum (pressure of the order of 10*-5* mbar) no signs of degradation are observed even for an illumination intensity of several mW/$\mu$m2. A full encapsulation in hBN allows one to operate as if the sample were in vacuum, with no appreciable degradation under the same conditions. Finally, half encapsulation in hBN seems unable to prevent oxidation in samples kept in air for days.

The results on half-encapsulated samples are the most interesting, since this method is the most commonly used in the literature to fabricate few-layer NbSe2-based devices for transport measurements Xi et al. (2015, 2016); Paradiso et al. (2019). In fact, a common way to obtain devices for 4-terminal measurements consists in stamping the exfoliated flakes directly on pre-patterned Au electrodes and then stamping an hBN flake on top as a protection against oxidation. The question is then whether the hBN protection is indeed air-tight: our measurements above seem to indicate that this is not the case. However, it is important to determine whether the photo-induced oxidation observed, e.g., on sample $\mathsf{A}$ is due to the SiO2 substrate or to oxygen molecules diffusing in between the layers from the environment.

A direct way to test this is to compare the Raman spectra measured on the same half encapsulated sample (i) in vacuum, (ii) immediately after venting in air, and (iii) after a given time of exposure to air, in the same way as done for sample $\mathsf{D}$. The results of such test are shown in Fig. 4. Here we study a NbSe2 flake (sample $\mathsf{E}$) exfoliated in N2 atmosphere and half encapsulated in hBN before being removed from the glove box. The sample is mounted in the vacuum chamber and Raman spectra are measured at a pressure of few $10^{-5}$ mbar (panel b), with an illumination power of 2.5 mW and 300 s integration time. The chamber is vented with air and then several spectra are acquired in the next tens of minutes. In this case, no appreciable degradation is observed (panel (c)), except for a small decrease in the peak amplitude observed in the last spectrum, after more than 10 minutes of total illumination. The sample is then left in air for two days. Then, several Raman spectra are measured (panel (d)). Now, every measurement (300 s integration time with a power of 2.3 mW) produces a substantial decrease of the Raman peak amplitude, until only a faint trace is left after ten minutes of exposure. Similar results have been obtained on another half encapsulated sample, as discussed in the Supplementary Information.

These results clearly indicate that half hBN encapsulation is not air tight. The subnanometric roughness of the SiO2 surface allows oxygen molecules to slowly diffuse in between the interface SiO2-hBN. On the other hand, the atomically smooth hBN-hBN interface is perfectly tight and ensures a long term and reliable protection against oxidation.

This behavior seems to be confirmed also by our experience with the contact resistance of Au or graphite contacts on NbSe2 in half encapsulated devices. We systematically observe that the contact resistance monotonically increases with the exposure time to air. Based on the above results, we suggest to use for transport experiments either a full encapsulation in hBN (as in Ref. Tsen et al. (2015)) or, if this is not possible or convenient, we recommend to keep the sample as much as possible in high vacuum and minimize the exposure time to air.

In conclusion, we have investigated how exposure to air affects Raman measurements on NbSe2, a representative van der Waals material which tends to oxidize in the presence of air and intense illumination. We found that samples in high vacuum are not affected by oxidation even under illumination intensities of several mW/$\mu$m2. We demonstrated that full encapsulation in hBN effectively provides a long term protection against oxidation for samples kept in ambient conditions. The same does not hold for half encapsulated devices, where we observed a slow diffusion of oxygen in between the hBN layer and the SiO2 substrate.

Supporting Information Available

(Absence of) influence of hBN encapsulation on the shear mode Raman shift. Measurements on monolayers: sample $\mathsf{C}$. Additional measurements on half hBN encapsulated samples.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Acknowledgements.

The work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within Grants DFG SFB1277 (B04 and B06), GRK1570 and KO3612/3-1. Bulk NbSe2 was purchased from HQ Graphene.