# As easy as 1, 2... 4? Uncertainty in counting tasks for medical imaging

**Authors:** Zach Eaton-Rosen, Thomas Varsavsky, Sebastien Ourselin, M. Jorge, Cardoso

arXiv: 1907.11555 · 2019-07-29

## TL;DR

This paper compares existing methods for counting in medical imaging, proposes a multi-task network approach for uncertainty estimation, and demonstrates its effectiveness in histopathology and white matter hyperintensity counting.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel multi-task network method for calculating predictive intervals that are narrow yet reliably enclose the true count.

## Key findings

- Effective in histopathological cell counting
- Accurate in white matter hyperintensity counting
- Predictive intervals are optimally narrow and reliable

## Abstract

Counting is a fundamental task in biomedical imaging and count is an important biomarker in a number of conditions. Estimating the uncertainty in the measurement is thus vital to making definite, informed conclusions. In this paper, we first compare a range of existing methods to perform counting in medical imaging and suggest ways of deriving predictive intervals from these. We then propose and test a method for calculating intervals as an output of a multi-task network. These predictive intervals are optimised to be as narrow as possible, while also enclosing a desired percentage of the data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this technique on histopathological cell counting and white matter hyperintensity counting. Finally, we offer insight into other areas where this technique may apply.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.11555/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.11555/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.11555/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.11555