Unital locally matrix algebras and Steinitz numbers
Oksana Bezushchak, Bogdana Oliynyk

TL;DR
This paper investigates unital locally matrix algebras over a field, introducing Steinitz numbers to classify them and exploring the relationship between these numbers and the algebraic structure.
Contribution
It introduces Steinitz numbers as invariants for unital locally matrix algebras and analyzes their relationship with the algebra's structure.
Findings
Steinitz numbers classify unital locally matrix algebras
A relationship between Steinitz numbers and algebra structure is established
Provides a framework for understanding the structure of locally matrix algebras
Abstract
An -algebra with unit is said to be a locally matrix algebra if an arbitrary finite collection of elements from lies in a subalgebra with of the algebra , that is isomorphic to a matrix algebra To an arbitrary unital locally matrix algebra we assign a Steinitz number and study a relationship between and .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Unital locally matrix algebras and Steinitz numbers
Oksana Bezushchak and Bogdana Oliynyk
Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University Volodymyrska, 64, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine
Department of Mathematics, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Skovorody St. 2, Kyiv, 04070, Ukraine
[email protected], [email protected]
Abstract.
An -algebra with unit is said to be a locally matrix algebra if an arbitrary finite collection of elements from lies in a subalgebra with of the algebra , that is isomorphic to a matrix algebra To an arbitrary unital locally matrix algebra we assign a Steinitz number and study a relationship between and .
Key words and phrases:
Keyword: locally matrix algebra, Steinitz number, diagonal embedding, Clifford algebra
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
2010
The second author was partially supported by the grant 346300 for IMPAN from the Simons Foundation and the matching 2015-2019 Polish MNiSW fund
Mathematics Subject Classification: 03C05, 03C60, 11E88
1. Introduction
Let be a ground field. Throughout the paper we consider associative –algebras with . We say that an algebra is a locally matrix algebra if an arbitrary finite collection of elements lies in a subalgebra , , that is isomorphic to a matrix algebra
J. G. Glimm [5] parametrised countable dimensional locally matrix algebras (under the name uniformly hyperfinite algebras) with Steinitz or supernatural numbers. O. Bezushchak, B. Oliynyk and V. Sushchanskii [3] extended their parametrisation to regular relation structures. The idea of diagonal embeddings was introduced by A. E. Zalesskii in [10]. In a series of papers A. A. Baranov and A. G. Zhilinskii used Steinitz numbers to classify diagonal locally simple Lie algebras of countable dimension [1], [2].
In this paper we introduce a Steinitz number for a unital locally matrix algebra of arbitrary dimension and study the relation between and .
In the section 3 we show that for locally matrix algebras of arbitrary dimensions universal theories of coincide if and only if .
In the section 4 we consider examples of unital locally matrix algebras and find their Steinitz numbers. Finally, in the section 4 we give example of nonisomorphic locally matrix algebras of uncountable dimension such that
2. Preliminaries
Let and let . Let be the centralizer of in . Then (see [6]), , which implies m=nk.
Let be the set of all primes. A *Steinitz * or supernatural number is an infinite formal product of the form
[TABLE]
where . The product of two Steinitz numbers
[TABLE]
is a Steinitz number
[TABLE]
where we assume, that , for all positive integers . Denote by the set of all Steinitz numbers. Obviously, the set of all positive integers is a subset of the set of all Steinitz numbers . The elements of the set are called *infinite Steinitz * numbers.
The Steinitz number divides if there exists , such that . The divisibility relation makes into a partially ordered set with the greatest element
[TABLE]
and the least element . Moreover, the poset is a complete lattice.
Steinitz numbers were introduced by Ernst Steinitz [9] in 1910 to classify algebraic extensions of finite fields.
Definition 1**.**
Let be an infinite dimensional unital locally matrix algebra over a field and let be the set of all positive integers , such that there is a subalgebra , , and , where is the identity of . Then the least common multiple of the set is called the Steinitz or supernatural number of the algebra .
The following proposition is straightforward.
Proposition 1**.**
Let and be unital locally matrix algebras. Then the algebra is a unital locally matrix and
[TABLE]
Theorem 1** (See [2], [3], [5]).**
If and are unital locally matrix algebras of countable dimension then and are isomorphic if and only if .
For the rest of this paper, we will write if there is a subalgebra , , such that .
3. Universally equivalent algebras
Let be an algebraic system (see [7]). The universal elementary theory consists of universal closed formulas (see [7]) that are valid on . The systems and of the same signature are universally equivalent if .
Theorem 2**.**
Let and be unital locally matrix algebras. Then and are universally equivalent if and only if their Steinitz numbers and are equal, i.e.
[TABLE]
For proof of this theorem we need a lemma.
Lemma 1**.**
Let be a unital locally matrix algebra. The property can be written as a universal closed formula.
Proof.
Consider the formula
[TABLE]
where is the Kronecker delta, i.e. \delta_{jp}=\begin{cases}1,&\text{if j=p}\\ 0,&\text{ifj\neq p}\end{cases} and , .
The universal closed formula (1) is true if and only if . ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.
First we recall that if some universal closed formula is true on an algebraic structure, then it is true on any algebraic substructure.
If unital locally matrix algebras and are universally equivalent, then by Lemma 1 if and only if . This implies that is equal to and therefore .
Let‘s now suppose that . From the Malcev Local Theorem (see [7]) it follows, that the algebra is unitally embeddable in an ultraproduct of matrix algebras , . If , then . Since every , , is unitally embeddable in , it follows that the algebra is unitally embeddable in an ultrapower of the algebra .
As the algebra is unitally embeddable in an ultrapower of the algebra , if some universal closed formula is true on , then it is true on .
Similar, the unital locally matrix algebra is unitally embeddable in an ultrapower of , so if some universal closed formula is true on , then it is true on and our theorem is proved. ∎
Remark 1**.**
It is important that identity is added to the signature. Without in the signature any two infinite dimensional locally matrix algebras are elementarily equivalent.
4. Examples
Let be a vector space over a field , . Firstly, we recall a construction of Clifford algebras.
A map is called a quadratic form if the following conditions hold:
- (1)
for every and ; 2. (2)
is a bilinear form.
The quadratic form is nondegenerate if and only if the bilinear form is nondegenerate.
The Clifford algebra is a unital algebra generated by the vector space and and defined by relations for all . Hence,
[TABLE]
holds for any from the vector space in the Clifford algebra .
Let be a basis of the vector space . Assume, that the set of indexes is ordered. Then all possible ordered products , , and (that can be defined as the empty product) is a basis of the Clifford algebra .
Obviously, if , then . If is an infinite dimensional vector space, then .
Onward, we assume that the field is algebraically closed and the quadratic form is nondegenerate.
Theorem 3**.**
[6*]**
Let be the Clifford algebra defined by a nondegenerate quadratic form on and . If the number is even, then the Clifford algebra is isomorphic to the matrix algebra . If the number is odd, then the algebra is isomorphic to the direct sum of matrix algebras .*
Theorem 4**.**
Let be an infinite dimensional vector space. Then the Clifford algebra is locally matrix and .
Proof.
Assume, that is a finite subset of the Clifford algebra . As is finite, there is a finite dimensional subspace of the vector space , such that .
For any finite dimensional subspace of a vector space there is a subspace of , such that the following conditions hold:
- (1)
is even; 2. (2)
; 3. (3)
the restriction of the form to is nondegenerate.
Assume now, that . Then and
[TABLE]
Therefore, by the definition of a locally matrix algebra and the Steinitz number corresponding to it, the Clifford algebra is locally matrix and . ∎
To obtain more examples we consider a generalization of Clifford algebras.
Choose a positive integer that is coprime with characteristic of the ground field Let be an -th primitive root of Consider the generalized Clifford algebra
[TABLE]
Such algebras in a more general form were considered in [8].
Similarly, for an arbitrary ordered set we consider
[TABLE]
Theorem 5**.**
1) For an even we have
[TABLE]
2) for an odd we have
Proof.
Using the Groebner–Shirshov technique [4] we see that ordered monomials form a basis of the algebra In particular,
[TABLE]
For an arbitrary the mapping
[TABLE]
extends to an automorphism of the algebra
Lemma 2**.**
Let be a subspace of that is invariant under Then is spanned by all ordered monomials lying in
Proof.
Let where lies in the subalgebra generated by Then
[TABLE]
Viewing these equalities as a system of equations in with the Vandermonde determinant we represent each as a linear combination of Hence each lies in
Repeating this argument several times we get the assertion of lemma. ∎
Corollary 1**.**
The algebra does not contain proper ideals that are invariant under
Corollary 2**.**
The algebra is semisimple.
Now our aim is to find monomials that lie in the center of By Lemma 2 these monomials span Let We have
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
If is even then the matrix
[TABLE]
over is invertible. Therefore in this case and This proves the part 1) of the theorem.
If is odd then the rank of is and the system (2) has solutions Hence This implies that the algebra is a direct sum of simple summands, Automorphisms of permute the ideals By Corollary 1 of the Lemma 2 they are conjugate under hence isomorphic. Since it follows that This proves the part 2) of the theorem. ∎
Theorem 6**.**
The Steinitz number of a unital locally matrix algebra , where the set is infinite, is .
Proof.
For an arbitrary finite subset of there exists a finite subset , such that Without loss of generality, we can assume that is an even number.Then by Theorem 5 This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎
Theorem 7**.**
If is a Steinitz number, such that for some positive integer , then for any infinite dimension there is a unital locally matrix algebra , such that and .
Proof.
Let . Let . In [3] it is proved that there exists a countable dimensional locally matrix algebra , such that .
Let be an ordered set of cardinality , let . Then and It is easy to see that . ∎
A Steinitz number is called locally finite if for any .
Conjecture 1**.**
If is a locally finite Steinitz number, is a unital locally matrix algebra and , then is countable dimensional.
5. Non isomorphic algebras with equal Steinitz numbers
We will construct two nonisomorphic unital locally matrix algebras of uncountable dimension, such their Steinitz numbers are equal.
Thus we show that Theorem 2 in the case of uncountable dimension is not true. Consider the vector space:
[TABLE]
Let be the quadratic form:
[TABLE]
The vector space has uncountable dimension.
Assume that is a set of indexes, whose cardinality is equal to the dimension of the vector space . Let now be a complex vector space with basis . Assume that is the quadratic form on determined for arbitrary , by the rule:
[TABLE]
Define Clifford algebras and . As follows from their constructions, algebras and are unital locally matrix and
[TABLE]
In addition, from Theorem 4 it follows, that
[TABLE]
Theorem 8**.**
Clifford algebras and are not isomorphic.
To prove this theorem we need some lemmas.
Let be a vector space with a quadratic form . Then there is the natural -gradation of the Clifford algebra :
[TABLE]
where subspaces and are spanned by all even and all odd products respectively.
Lemma 3**.**
Let be a descending chain of subspaces , , and . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let us show that without loss of generality we can assume the space to be countable dimensional. Indeed, let
[TABLE]
For an arbitrary there exists a finite dimensional subspace such that . Let , , and let . Then , and .
Assume therefore that the space is countable dimensional. Let be a basis of .
Without loss of generality we assume that .
For any finite dimensional subspace there clearly exists such that We will construct an ascending chain of finite subsets of the basis and an increasing sequence of integers such that
- (1)
, 2. (2)
is a basis of the space modulo , for any .
Let be a maximal subset of such that is linearly independent modulo and . Let .
Suppose that subsets and integers have been selected; the subset is a basis of modulo ; .
Let be a smallest integer such that ; . There exists an integer such that is linearly independent modulo . Let be a maximal subset of that is linearly independent modulo and . Clearly, is a basis of modulo and . Considering the subspaces instead of , , we can assume that is a basis of modulo , .
Now we will construct a new ordered basis of . Let . Let . For each , , there exists an element , such that . Let
[TABLE]
Clearly, Continuing in this way we construct disjoint finite set such that and , . Hence is a basis of .
Let all elements in be greater than all elements in , . For each elements in are ordered in an arbitrary way.
Strictly ordered products of elements from form a basis of the Clifford algebra . Ordered products , where , form a basis of . This implies the assertion of the Lemma. ∎
Let now be an element of , such that . Define a set
[TABLE]
It is clear, that
[TABLE]
By we denote the centralizer of the element in the Clifford algebra , i.e. .
Lemma 4**.**
- (A)
If , then
[TABLE] 2. (B)
Let be an odd number. Then for the elements , , such that a_{ij}=\begin{cases}1,\text{if j=i}\\ 0,\text{if j\neq i}\end{cases}, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
The equality (3) implies, that any element from is equal to a sum of products of the element and some elements from .
Define the operator , via . As we have
[TABLE]
Hence the operator has two eigenvalues and . For any vector from we have
[TABLE]
So . As we obtain the equality
[TABLE]
Hence any vector from is an eigenvector of the operator with the eigenvalue .
Let now be elements from the set . For the reasons given above it follows that if is even, then is an eigenvector of the operator with the eigenvalue . Therefore the element of is an element of the centralizer . Note, that if is odd, then is an eigenvector of the operator with the eigenvalue , and so is not an element of .
Similarly, if is even, then is an eigenvector of the operator with the eigenvalue and lies in in the centralizer . If is odd, then is not an element of . Therefore
[TABLE]
and the first statement is proved.
As for any we have , the proof of the second statement follows from the first statement by induction. ∎
Let be the set .
Proposition 2**.**
The centralizer of the set in the algebra is
Proof.
Consider a centralizer of the set
[TABLE]
The subspace of the algebra is –graded, i.e.
[TABLE]
Assume, that . Then
[TABLE]
Let be an odd number such, that By Lemma 4, (B) . Let , be an ordered basis of the subspace . Then , is a basis of . The set of ordered products of elements of this basis is a basis of . Elements , , lie in this basis. Hence,
[TABLE]
Therefore, and So, . According to Lemma 4, (B) . Thus Lemma 3 implies ∎
Proposition 3**.**
For an arbitrary countable subset of the algebra the centralizer of in is different from
Proof.
Let be a countable subset of the algebra There exists a countable subset , such that where So, for any indexes the element belongs the centralizer of ∎
Proof of Theorem 8.
By Proposition 2 the centralizer of the set in the Clifford algebra is But by Proposition 3 the centralizer of in the Clifford algebra is different from for an arbitrary countable subset of . Therefore, and are not isomorphic. ∎
6. Acknowledgement
We are grateful to E. Zelmanov for helpful discussions and valuable comments.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. A. Baranov, Classification of the direct limits of involution simple associative algebras and the corresponding dimension groups, Journal of Algebra , 381 (2013) 73–95.
- 2[2] A. A. Baranov, A. G .Zhilinskii, Diagonal direct limits of simple Lie algebras, Commun. in Algebra , 27 (1999), no. 6, 2749–2766.
- 3[3] O. Bezushchak, B. Oliynyk, V. Sushchansky, Representation of Steinitz‘s lattice in lattices of substructures of relational structures, Algebra Discrete Math. , 21 (2016), no. 2, 184–-201.
- 4[4] L. A. Bokut, Yuqun Chen, Gröbner–Shirshov bases and their calculation, Bull. Math. Sci. , 4 (2014), no. 3, 325–-395. DOI 10.1007/s 13373-014-0054-6
- 5[5] J. G. Glimm, On a certain class of operator algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 95 (1960) no. 2, 318–340.
- 6[6] N. Jacobson, Structure and representations of Jordan algebras (American Mathematical Soc., 1968).
- 7[7] A.I. Mal‘cev, Algebraic Systems. B.D. Seckler & A.P. Doohovskoy (trans.). (Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1973).
- 8[8] A. Ramakrishnan, L-matrix theory : or, The grammar of Dirac matrices (Tata Mc Graw-Hill Pub. Co., 1972).
