Accretion Disk Parameters determined from the great 2015 flare of OJ 287
Mauri J. Valtonen, Staszek Zola, Pauli Pihajoki, Sissi Enestam, Harry, J. Lehto, Lankeswar Dey, Achamveedu Gopakumar, Marek Drozdz, Waldemar Ogloza,, Michal Zejmo, Alok C. Gupta, Tapio Pursimo, Stefano Ciprini, Mark Kidger,, Kari Nilsson, Andrei Berdyugin, Vilppu Piirola

TL;DR
This paper refines the accretion disk parameters of OJ 287 based on the 2015 flare, predicts a 2019 superflare, and analyzes the emission mechanisms involved.
Contribution
It updates the disk viscosity and accretion rate parameters and provides detailed predictions and analysis of flare emission regions.
Findings
Viscosity parameter α = 0.26 ± 0.1
Mass accretion rate ṁ = 0.08 ± 0.04 in Eddington units
2019 superflare expected to be observed simultaneously in infrared and optical
Abstract
In the binary black hole model of OJ 287 the secondary black hole orbits a much more massive primary, and impacts on the primary accretion disk at predictable times. We update the parameters of the disk, the viscosity and the mass accretion rate . We find and in Eddington units. The former value is consistent with Coroniti (1981) and the latter with Marscher and Jorstad (2011). Predictions are made for the 2019 July 30 superflare in OJ 287. We expect that it will take place simultaneously at the Spitzer infrared channels as well as in the optical and that therefore the timing of the flare in optical can be accurately determined from Spitzer observations. We also discuss in detail the light curve of the 2015 flare and find that the radiating volume has regions where bremsstrahlung dominates as well as regions that radiate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
An example of a Research Note of the American Astronomical Society (RNAAS)
Ethan Vishniac
Editor-in-Chief
Johns Hopkins University
Chris Lintott
RNAAS Editor
Oxford University
American Astronomical Society
2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20009-1231, USA
August Muench
American Astronomical Society
2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20009-1231, USA
editorials, notices — miscellaneous — catalogs — surveys
1
Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society (RNAAS) is a publication in the AAS portfolio (alongside ApJ, AJ, ApJ Supplements, and ApJ Letters) through which authors can promptly and briefly share materials of interest with the astronomical community in a form that will be searchable via ADS and permanently archived.
The astronomical community has long faced a challenge in disseminating information that may not meet the criteria for a traditional journal article. There have generally been few options available for sharing works in progress, comments and clarifications, null results, and timely reports of observations (such as the spectrum of a supernova), as well as results that wouldn’t traditionally merit a full paper (such as the discovery of a single exoplanet or contributions to the monitoring of variable sources).
Launched in 2017, RNAAS was developed as a supported and long-term communication channel for results such as these that would otherwise be difficult to broadly disseminate to the professional community and persistently archive for future reference.
Submissions to RNAAS should be brief communications - 1,000 words or fewer 111An easy way to count the number of words in a Research Note is to use the texcount utility installed with most LaTeX installations. The call texcount -incbib -v3 rnaas.tex) gives 57 words in the front matter and 493 words in the text/references/captions of this template. Another option is by copying the words into MS/Word, and using “Word Count” under the Tool tab., and no more than a single figure (e.g. Figure 1) or table (but not both) - and should be written in a style similar to that of a traditional journal article, including references, where appropriate, but not including an abstract.
Unlike the other journals in the AAS portfolio, RNAAS publications are not peer reviewed; they are, however, reviewed by an editor for appropriateness and format before publication. If accepted, RNAAS submissions are typically published within 72 hours of manuscript receipt. Each RNAAS article is issued a DOI and indexed by ADS (Kurtz et al., 2000) to create a long-term, citable record of work.
Articles can be submitted in LaTeX (preferably with the new ”RNAAS” style option in AASTeX v6.2), MS/Word, or via the direct submission in the Authorea or Overleaf online collaborative editors.
Authors are expected to follow the AAS’s ethics (Kennicutt et al., 2006), including guidance on plagiarism (Vishniac, 2012).
Acknowledge people, facilities, and software here but remember that this counts against your 1000 word limit.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Kennicutt et al. (2006) Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., Vishniac, E., & Sneden, C. 2006, Ap J, 652, 847
- 2Kurtz et al. (2000) Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 41
- 3Vishniac (2012) Vishniac, E. T. 2012, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219, 219, 204.04
