Performance Comparison of Quasi-Delay-Insensitive Asynchronous Adders
P Balasubramanian

TL;DR
This paper compares various quasi-delay-insensitive asynchronous adders in terms of design metrics, highlighting their suitability for low power and area-constrained VLSI applications.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of different QDI adder architectures, identifying those optimal for low power and area efficiency in 32/28nm CMOS technology.
Findings
Identifies QDI adders suitable for low power applications
Highlights design metrics differences among QDI architectures
Excludes non-QDI adders due to lack of robustness
Abstract
In this technical note, we provide a comparison of the design metrics of various quasi-delay-insensitive (QDI) asynchronous adders, where the adders correspond to diverse architectures. QDI adders are robust, and the objective of this technical note is to point to those QDI adders which are suitable for low power/energy and less area. This information could be valuable for a resource-constrained low power VLSI design scenario. Non-QDI adders are excluded from the comparison since they are not robust although they may have optimized design metrics. All the QDI adders were realized using a 32/28nm CMOS process.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLow-power high-performance VLSI design · Interconnection Networks and Systems · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
