Constraining Dimension-Six Nonminimal Lorentz-Violating Electron--Nucleon Interactions with EDM Physics [CPT'19]
Jonas B. Araujo, A. Blin, Marcos Sampaio, Manoel M. Ferreira Jr

TL;DR
This paper investigates how dimension-six Lorentz-violating electron--nucleon interactions can induce electric dipole moments in atoms, and sets experimental bounds on these violations using EDM measurements.
Contribution
It classifies possible Lorentz-violating couplings in electron--nucleon interactions and constrains their magnitudes through EDM experimental data.
Findings
Constraints on Lorentz-violating coefficients at levels of 3.2×10⁻³¹ (eV)⁻² and 1.6×10⁻³³ (eV)⁻².
Identification of couplings compatible with electric dipole moment physics.
Analysis of the behavior of Lorentz-violating tensors under C, P, and T transformations.
Abstract
Electric dipole moments of atoms can arise from P-odd and T-odd electron--nucleon couplings. This work studies a general class of dimension-six electron--nucleon interactions mediated by Lorentz-violating tensors of ranks ranging from to . The possible couplings are listed as well as their behavior under C, P, and T, allowing us to select the couplings compatible with electric-dipole-moment physics. The unsuppressed contributions of these couplings to the atom's hamiltonian can be read as equivalent to an electric dipole moment. The Lorentz-violating coefficients' magnitudes are limited using electric-dipole-moment measurements at the levels of or .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Constraining Dimension-Six Nonminimal Lorentz-Violating Electron–Nucleon
Interactions with EDM Physics
Jonas B. Araujo
1 A.H. Blin
2 Marcos Sampaio
3
and Manoel M. Ferreira Jr1
1Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Maranhão,
Campus Universitário do Bacanga, São Luís - MA, 65080-805, Brazil
2CFisUC, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra,
3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
3CCNH, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André - SP, 09210-580, Brazil
Abstract
Electric dipole moments of atoms can arise from P-odd and T-odd electron–nucleon couplings. This work studies a general class of dimension-six electron–nucleon interactions mediated by Lorentz-violating tensors of ranks ranging from to . The possible couplings are listed as well as their behavior under C, P, and T, allowing us to select the couplings compatible with electric-dipole-moment physics. The unsuppressed contributions of these couplings to the atom’s hamiltonian can be read as equivalent to an electric dipole moment. The Lorentz-violating coefficients’ magnitudes are limited using electric-dipole-moment measurements at the levels of or .
\bodymatter
1 Introduction
Electric dipole moments (EDMs) are excellent probes for violations of discrete symmetries and for physics beyond the Standard Model.[1] EDM terms violate both parity (P) and time-reversal (T) symmetry, while preserving charge conjugation (C), assuming the CPT theorem holds. An atom’s EDM could arise from intrinsic properties of the electrons and/or nucleus, or from P- and T-odd electron–nucleon (–) couplings. EDM phenomenology can also arise in a Lorentz-violation (LV) scenario addressed within the framework of the Standard-Model Extension (SME).[2] LV generates CP violation and EDMs via radiative corrections[3] or at tree level via dimension-five nonminimal couplings,[4, 5] and may also yield nuclear-EDM corrections to the Schiff moment.[6] Nonminimal couplings have been of great interest in recent years.[7] In this work, we investigate a class of dimension-six LV – couplings, composed of rank- to rank- background tensors, first proposed in Ref. \refciteLVArbDim, and the possible generation of atomic EDMs.[9]
2 Nonminimal – Lorentz-violating couplings
The simplest couplings involve a rank- LV tensor with an effective lagrangian of the form where the upper belongs either to or . The subscript labels the type of fermion bilinear: scalar (), pseudoscalar (), vector (), axial vector (), and tensor (), accounting for the linearly independent matrices. The operators must be combinations of Dirac matrices, given here as
[TABLE]
and , , with , . As we are interested in EDM behavior, we select the P-odd and T-odd components. The rank- couplings are listed in Table 2, in which “S” and “NS” mean “suppressed” and “not suppressed,” respectively, in the nucleon’s nonrelativistic limit. Couplings of higher ranks are shown in Tables 2 to 2.
The EDM contribution, in the nonrelativistic limit for the nucleons, is calculated via atomic parity nonconservation methods[10] as
[TABLE]
where is the coupling’s hamiltonian contribution for the electron, and —which have opposite parity—correspond to
[TABLE]
where and . While obeys Dirac’s equation for a central potential, obeys Sternheimer’s equation.[10]
By evaluating for each coupling via Eq. (2) and performing a sidereal analysis,[5] one can set upper bounds on the LV coefficients using numerical estimates on the thallium atom and the experimental limit on the electron’s EDM.[11] A list of time-averaged upper bounds is given in Table 2. More information can be found in Ref. \refciteadded.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to CAPES, CNPq, FCT Portugal, and FAPEMA.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Engel, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71 , 21 (2013); T. Chupp and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. C 91 , 035502 (2015); N. Yamanaka et al. , Eur. Phys. J. A 53 , 54 (2017).
- 2[2] D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55 , 6760 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 58 , 116002 (1998); S.R. Coleman and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 59 , 116008 (1999).
- 3[3] M. Haghighat, I. Motie, and Z. Rezaei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 , 1350115 (2013).
- 4[4] P.A. Bolokhov, M. Pospelov, and M. Romalis, Phys. Rev. D 78 , 057702 (2008).
- 5[5] J.B. Araujo, R. Casana, and M.M. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 92 , 025049 (2015); Phys. Lett. B 760 , 302 (2016).
- 6[6] J.B. Araujo, R. Casana, and M.M. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 055032 (2018).
- 7[7] G. Gazzola et al. , J. Phys. G 39 , 035002 (2012); L.C.T. Brito, H.G. Fargnoli, and A.P. Baêta Scarpelli, Phys. Rev. D 87 , no. 12, 125023 (2013); L.H.C. Borges et al. , Phys. Lett. B 756 , 332 (2016); Y.M.P. Gomes and J.T. Guaitolini Junior, Phys. Rev. D 99 , 055006 (2019); V.E. Mouchrek-Santos and M.M. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 95 , no. 7, 071701 (2017); J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 952 , 012019 (2018).
- 8[8] V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D 99 , 056016 (2019).
