# Intrinsic Morphology of Ultra-diffuse Galaxies

**Authors:** Yu Rong, Xiao-Yu Dong, Thomas H. Puzia, Gaspar Galaz, Tianwen Cao,, Remco F. J. Van Der Burg, Cristobal Sifon, Pavel E. Mancera Pina, Mora, Marcelo, Giuseppe D'ago, Hong-Xin Zhang, Evelyn J. Johnston, Paul Eigenthaler

arXiv: 1907.10079 · 2020-08-26

## TL;DR

This study uses a triaxial model and MCMC analysis to reveal that ultra-diffuse galaxies are generally oblate-triaxial, with morphologies influenced by luminosity, environment, and redshift, challenging previous prolate assumptions.

## Contribution

It provides the first detailed intrinsic shape analysis of UDGs across different redshifts, showing they are mainly oblate-triaxial rather than prolate, and links morphology to their environment and evolution.

## Key findings

- UDGs favor oblate-triaxial shapes over prolate models.
- More luminous low-redshift UDGs are thicker than less luminous ones.
- Intermediate-redshift UDGs are more flattened, indicating a possible 'disky' origin.

## Abstract

With the published data of apparent axis ratios for 1109 ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) located in 17 low-redshift (z~ 0.020 - 0.063) galaxy clusters and 84 UDGs in 2 intermediate-redshift (z~ 0.308 - 0.348) clusters, we take advantage of a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach and assume a ubiquitous triaxial model to investigate the intrinsic morphologies of UDGs. In contrast to the conclusion of Burkert (2017), i.e., the underlying shapes of UDGs are purely prolate ($C=B<A$), we find that the data favor the oblate-triaxial models ($C<B\lesssim A$) over the nearly prolate ones. We also find that the intrinsic morphologies of UDGs are relevant to their stellar masses/luminosities, environments, and redshifts. First, for the low-redshift UDGs in the same environment, the more-luminous ones are always thicker than the less-luminous counterparts, possibly due to the more voilent internal supernovae feedback or external tidal interactions for the progenitors of the more-luminous UDGs. The UDG thickness dependence on luminosity is distinct from that of the typical quiescent dwarf ellipticals (dEs) and dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) in the local clusters and groups, but resembles that of massive galaxies; in this sense, UDGs may not be simply treated as an extension of the dE/dSph class with similar evolutionary histories. Second, for the low-redshift UDGs within the same luminosity range, the ones with smaller cluster-centric distances are more puffed-up, probably attributed to tidal interactions. Finally, the intermediate-redshift cluster UDGs are more flattened, which plausibly suggests a `disky' origin for high-redshift, initial UDGs.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.10079/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.10079/full.md

## References

119 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.10079/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.10079