Evaluating the Effect of Geometry and Control on Freeway Merge Bottleneck Capacity

TL;DR

This study investigates how geometric and operational features like lane number and ramp metering influence freeway merge bottleneck capacity, revealing that more lanes decrease capacity while ramp meters increase it, with specific capacity values identified.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of multiple features affecting merge capacity across diverse U.S. sites, highlighting the significant impact of lane number and ramp metering.

Findings

More lanes decrease pre-breakdown flow rate.

Ramp meters increase pre-breakdown flow rate.

Capacity values vary with lane number and metering presence.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of geometric and operational features on freeway capacity at merge bottleneck locations, by analyzing pre-breakdown flow rates and using parametric and non-parametric techniques. These features include number of lanes, free-flow speed or speed limit, length of acceleration lane, and presence or ramp metering. The analysis was carried out on seventeen freeway merge sites across the United States. The number of lanes showed negative relationship with the per-lane average pre-breakdown flow rate. Sites equipped with ramp meters also showed higher pre-breakdown flow rates than unmetered sites. In survival analysis, the number of lanes and presence of ramp meters were the only features found to have a statistically significant impact on the survival (or breakdown) probability. Capacities, defined at the flow rate that corresponds to 15 percent breakdown probability, were 2,048, 1,959, and 1,745 pc/hr/ln at three-lane, four-lane, and five-lane unmetered sites, respectively. Capacities were 2,248 pc/hr/ln at three-lane and 2,132 pc/hr/ln at four-lane metered sites. The effect of acceleration lane length and Free Flow Speed (FFS) on pre-breakdown flow rate and survival probability was not found to be significant.