
TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of models and simulations in understanding human morality, highlighting their underappreciated contributions across diverse disciplines.
Contribution
It advocates for recognizing the significant role of modeling in advancing scientific understanding of morality, countering previous dismissals.
Findings
Models have played crucial roles in interdisciplinary morality research.
The use of simulations has contributed to answering complex moral questions.
Models have been undervalued in the scientific study of morality.
Abstract
Unlike any other field, the science of morality has drawn attention from an extraordinarily diverse set of disciplines. An interdisciplinary research program has formed in which economists, biologists, neuroscientists, psychologists, and even philosophers have been eager to provide answers to puzzling questions raised by the existence of human morality. Models and simulations, for a variety of reasons, have played various important roles in this endeavor. Their use, however, has sometimes been deemed as useless, trivial and inadequate. The role of models in the science of morality has been vastly underappreciated. This omission shall be remedied here, offering a much more positive picture on the contributions modelers made to our understanding of morality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Business and Education · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
