# Magnetic reconnection with null and X-points

**Authors:** Allen H. Boozer

arXiv: 1907.08062 · 2020-01-08

## TL;DR

This paper challenges traditional views on magnetic reconnection near null and X-points, emphasizing the role of ideal evolution and the importance of different spatial regions over direct field line approach.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that in 3D systems, magnetic reconnection can occur without dissipation, driven by ideal evolution and flux mixing, altering the understanding of reconnection mechanisms.

## Key findings

- Reconnection can occur without dissipation in 3D systems.
- The importance of the scale $c/\omega_{pe}$ is context-dependent.
- Flux mixing requires significantly less current than flux diffusion in high $R_m$ regimes.

## Abstract

Null and X-points are not themselves directly important to magnetic reconnection because distinguishable field lines do not approach them closely. Even in a collision-free plasma, magnetic field lines that approach each other on a scale $c/\omega_{pe}$ become indistinguishable during an evolution. What is important is the different regions of space that can be explored by magnetic field lines that pass in the vicinity of null and X-points. Traditional reconnection theories made the assumption that the reconnected magnetic flux must be dissipated or diffused by an electric field. This assumption is false in three dimensional systems because an ideal evolution can cause magnetic field lines that cover a large volume to approach each other within the indistinguishability scale $c/\omega_{pe}$. When the electron collision time $\tau_{ei}$ is short compared to the evolution time of the magnetic field $\tau_{ev}$, the importance of $c/\omega_{pe}$ is replaced by the resistive time scale $\tau_\eta=(\eta/\mu_0)L^2$ with $L$ the system scale. The magnetic Reynolds number is $R_m\equiv\tau_\eta/\tau_{ev}$ is enormous in many reconnection problems of interest. Magnetic flux diffusion implies the current density required for reconnection to compete with evolution scales as $R_m$ while flux mixing implies the required current density to compete scales as $\ln R_m$.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.08062/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.08062/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.08062/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.08062