# Fast Radio Burst Injection Tests

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the sensitivity and detection efficiency of FRB search pipelines, revealing that missed injections are due to known issues like noise and interference, thus reassuring the reliability of current methods.

## Contribution

It provides an in-depth analysis of missed synthetic FRB injections, identifying specific causes and demonstrating that these do not undermine the pipeline's effectiveness.

## Key findings

- Missed injections are caused by noise, mislabeling, and interference.
- All missed injections can be explained without questioning pipeline validity.
- Current detection pipelines are reliable despite some missed signals.

## Abstract

Searches for fast radio bursts (FRBs) are underway at a growing number of radio telescopes worldwide. The sample size is now sufficient to enable many investigations into the population properties. As such, understanding the true sensitivity thresholds, effective observing time expended, survey completeness and parameter space coverage has become vital for calibrating the observed distributions. Recently the Molonglo FRB search team reported on their, as yet unique, efforts to inject synthetic FRB signals into their telescope data streams. Their results show 10 percent of injections being missed, even at very high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. Their pipeline employs components considered standard across several telescopes so that the result is potentially alarming. In this paper we present a further look at these missed injections. It is shown that all of the missed injections can be explained by combinations of the noise statistics, mis-labelling, overly harsh data analysis cuts, incorrect S/N calculations and radio frequency interference. There is no need to be alarmed.