Ultra-broadband nanophotonic phase shifter based on subwavelength metamaterial waveguides
David Gonz\'alez-Andrade, Jos\'e Manuel Luque-Gonz\'alez, J. Gonzalo, Wang\"uemert-P\'erez, Alejandro Ortega-Mo\~nux, Pavel Cheben, \'I\~nigo, Molina-Fern\'andez, and Aitor V. Velasco

TL;DR
This paper introduces an ultra-broadband passive optical phase shifter based on subwavelength metamaterial waveguides, achieving minimal phase error over a wide telecom spectrum with high fabrication robustness.
Contribution
It presents a novel metamaterial waveguide design enabling ultra-broadband, passive 90° phase shifting with unprecedented bandwidth and robustness against fabrication errors.
Findings
Predicts phase shift error below ±1.7° over 1.35-1.75 μm range
Demonstrates fourfold reduction in phase variation experimentally
Achieves flat spectral response with fabrication error tolerance
Abstract
Optical phase shifters are extensively used in integrated optics not only for telecom and datacom applications, but also for sensors and quantum computing. While various active solutions have been demonstrated, progress in passive phase shifters is still lacking. Here, we present a new type of ultra-broadband 90{\deg} phase shifter, which exploits the anisotropy and dispersion engineering in subwavelength metamaterial waveguides. Our Floquet-Bloch calculations predict a phase shift error below 1.7{\deg} over an unprecedented operation range from 1.35 m to 1.75 m, i.e. 400 nm bandwidth covering the E, S, C, L and U telecommunication bands. The flat spectral response of our phase shifter is maintained even in the presence of fabrication errors up to 20 nm, showing greater robustness than conventional structures. Our device was experimentally demonstrated using standard…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
