The cyclicality of loan loss provisions under three different accounting models: the United Kingdom, Spain, and Brazil
A. M. B. Araujo, P. R. B. Lustosa

TL;DR
This study compares how loan loss provisions in the UK, Spain, and Brazil behave across economic cycles, revealing a pro-cyclical pattern despite different accounting standards, influenced by credit risk, earnings, and macroeconomic factors.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of the cyclicality of loan loss provisions under three distinct accounting models across different countries.
Findings
Pro-cyclical behavior of provisions in all three countries.
Earnings management significantly influences provisions.
Macroeconomic variables like GDP and unemployment impact provisions.
Abstract
A controversy involving loan loss provisions in banks concerns their relationship with the business cycle. While international accounting standards for recognizing provisions (incurred loss model) would presumably be pro-cyclical, accentuating the effects of the current economic cycle, an alternative model, the expected loss model, has countercyclical characteristics, acting as a buffer against economic imbalances caused by expansionary or contractionary phases in the economy. In Brazil, a mixed accounting model exists, whose behavior is not known to be pro-cyclical or countercyclical. The aim of this research is to analyze the behavior of these accounting models in relation to the business cycle, using an econometric model consisting of financial and macroeconomic variables. The study allowed us to identify the impact of credit risk behavior, earnings management, capital management,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
