# Magnetic Inflation and Stellar Mass IV. Four Low-mass Kepler Eclipsing   Binaries Consistent with Non-magnetic Stellar Evolutionary Models

**Authors:** Eunkyu Han, Philip S. Muirhead, and Jonathan J. Swift

arXiv: 1907.07180 · 2019-08-21

## TL;DR

This study analyzes four low-mass Kepler eclipsing binaries and finds their stellar masses and radii align with non-magnetic stellar evolution models, challenging the magnetic inflation hypothesis.

## Contribution

It provides new mass and radius measurements for three Kepler EBs and demonstrates that these systems are consistent with standard stellar models without magnetic inhibition.

## Key findings

- Four low-mass Kepler EBs match non-magnetic models
- Two previously published systems confirmed
- Magnetic inflation may not be necessary to explain radii

## Abstract

Low-mass eclipsing binaries show systematically larger radii than model predictions for their mass, metallicity and age. Prominent explanations for the inflation involve enhanced magnetic fields generated by rapid rotation of the star that inhibit convection and/or suppress flux from the star via starspots. However, derived masses and radii for individual eclipsing binary systems often disagree in the literature. In this paper, we continue to investigate low-mass eclipsing binaries (EBs) observed by NASA's {\it Kepler} spacecraft, deriving stellar masses and radii using high-quality space-based light curves and radial velocities from high-resolution infrared spectroscopy. We report masses and radii for three {\it Kepler} EBs, two of which agree with previously published masses and radii (KIC 11922782 and KIC 9821078). For the third EB (KIC 7605600), we report new masses and show the secondary component is likely fully convective ($M_2 = 0.17 \pm 0.01 M_{\sun}$ and $R_2 = 0.199^{+0.001}_{-0.002} R_{\sun}$). Combined with KIC 10935310 from Han et al. (2017), we find that the masses and radii for four low-mass {\it Kepler} EBs are consistent with modern stellar evolutionary models for M dwarf stars and do not require inhibited convection by magnetic fields to account for the stellar radii.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07180/full.md

## Figures

27 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07180/full.md

## References

49 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07180/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07180