# One String to Rule Them All: Neutrino Masses and Mixing Angles

**Authors:** Jordan Gemmill, Evan Howington, Van E. Mayes

arXiv: 1907.07106 · 2020-01-01

## TL;DR

This paper presents a string-inspired Pati-Salam model that naturally explains quark, lepton, and neutrino masses and mixing angles, predicting neutrino parameters consistent with experimental data through detailed theoretical and RG analysis.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel intersecting D6 brane Pati-Salam model that simultaneously accounts for quark, lepton, and neutrino mixing, fixing the Dirac neutrino mass matrix and making testable predictions.

## Key findings

- Neutrino mixing angles close to observed values
- Predicted neutrino mass-squared differences match experimental data
- Total neutrino mass sum consistent with cosmological constraints

## Abstract

The correct quark and charged lepton mass matrices along with a nearly correct CKM matrix may be naturally accommodated in a Pati-Salam model constructed from intersecting D6 branes on a $T^6/(\Z_2 \times \Z_2)$ orientifold. Furthermore, near-tribimaximal mixing for neutrinos may arise naturally due to the structure of the Yukawa matrices. Consistency with the quark and charged lepton mass matrices in combination with obtaining near-tribimaximal mixing fixes the Dirac neutrino mass matrix completely. Then, applying the seesaw mechanism for different choices of right-handed neutrino masses and running the obtained neutrino parameters down to the electroweak scale via the RGEs, we are able to make predictions for the neutrino masses and mixing angles. We obtain lepton mixing angles which are close to the observed values, $\theta_{12} =33.8^{\circ}\pm1.2^{\circ}$, $\theta_{23}=46.9^{\circ}\pm0.9^{\circ}$, and $\theta_{13}=8.56^{\circ}\pm0.20^{\circ}$. In addition, the neutrino mass-squared differences are found to be $\Delta m^2_{32} = 0.0025\pm0.0001$~eV$^2$ and $\Delta m^2_{21} = 0.000075\pm0.000003$~eV with $m_1=0.0150\pm0.0002$~eV, $m_2=0.0173\pm0.0002$~eV, and $m_3=0.053\pm 0.002$~eV so that $\sum_i m_i = 0.085\pm0.002$~eV, consistent with experimental observations.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07106/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07106/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07106/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.07106