# Cosmological test of gravity using weak lensing voids

**Authors:** Christopher T. Davies, Marius Cautun, Baojiu Li

arXiv: 1907.06657 · 2019-11-06

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how weak lensing voids can serve as effective probes for testing modified gravity theories, demonstrating their sensitivity through abundance and profile measurements in simulated LSST-like surveys.

## Contribution

It introduces the use of weak lensing voids as a less biased method to detect signatures of modified gravity, comparing their effectiveness to galaxy voids and peaks.

## Key findings

- Weak lensing voids are sensitive to modified gravity signatures.
- Void abundance and profiles provide high signal-to-noise ratios.
- Weak lensing voids outperform galaxy voids in detecting gravity modifications.

## Abstract

Modifications to General Relativity (GR) often incorporate screening mechanisms in order to remain compatible with existing tests of gravity. The screening is less efficient in underdense regions, which suggests that cosmic voids can be a useful cosmological probe for constraining modified gravity models. In particular, weak lensing by voids has been proposed as a promising test of such theories. Usually, voids are identified from galaxy distributions, making them biased tracers of the underlying matter field. An alternative approach is to study voids identified in weak lensing maps -- weak lensing voids -- which have been shown to better correspond to true underdense regions. In this paper, we study the ability of weak lensing voids to detect the signatures of modified gravity. Focusing on the void abundance and weak lensing profiles, we find that both statistics are sensitive probes of gravity. These are quantified in terms of the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) with which an LSST-like survey will be able to distinguish between different gravity models. We find that the tangential shear profiles of weak lensing voids are considerably better than galaxy voids at this, though voids have somewhat lower SNR than weak lensing peaks. The abundances of voids and peaks have respectively $\rm{SNR} = 50$ and $70$ for a popular class of modified gravity in an LSST-like survey.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.06657/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.06657/full.md

## References

92 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.06657/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.06657