# Toeplitz Inverse Covariance based Robust Speaker Clustering for   Naturalistic Audio Streams

**Authors:** Harishchandra Dubey, Abhijeet Sangwan, John Hansen

arXiv: 1907.05584 · 2019-07-15

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a robust speaker clustering method for diarization in naturalistic audio streams using Toeplitz Inverse Covariance matrices to model sequential i-vector correlations, significantly reducing diarization error rates.

## Contribution

It presents a novel model-based clustering approach leveraging Toeplitz Inverse Covariance matrices and an EM algorithm variant for improved speaker diarization accuracy.

## Key findings

- 43.22% reduction in DER on CRSS-PLTL corpus
- 29.37% reduction in DER on AMI subset IS1000a
- 9.21% reduction in DER on AMI subset IS1003b

## Abstract

Speaker diarization determines who spoke and when? in an audio stream. In this study, we propose a model-based approach for robust speaker clustering using i-vectors. The ivectors extracted from different segments of same speaker are correlated. We model this correlation with a Markov Random Field (MRF) network. Leveraging the advancements in MRF modeling, we used Toeplitz Inverse Covariance (TIC) matrix to represent the MRF correlation network for each speaker. This approaches captures the sequential structure of i-vectors (or equivalent speaker turns) belonging to same speaker in an audio stream. A variant of standard Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm is adopted for deriving closed-form solution using dynamic programming (DP) and the alternating direction method of multiplier (ADMM). Our diarization system has four steps: (1) ground-truth segmentation; (2) i-vector extraction; (3) post-processing (mean subtraction, principal component analysis, and length-normalization) ; and (4) proposed speaker clustering. We employ cosine K-means and movMF speaker clustering as baseline approaches. Our evaluation data is derived from: (i) CRSS-PLTL corpus, and (ii) two meetings subset of the AMI corpus. Relative reduction in diarization error rate (DER) for CRSS-PLTL corpus is 43.22% using the proposed advancements as compared to baseline. For AMI meetings IS1000a and IS1003b, relative DER reduction is 29.37% and 9.21%, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05584/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05584/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05584/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05584